Cited by 113Ethics and Social Impacts of AIArtificial Intelligence ApplicationsInnovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems

On the promotion of safe and socially beneficial artificial intelligence

Open access
Baum, Seth D.·2017·AI & SOCIETY

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00146-016-0677-0

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Questions about balancing are inevitably intertwined with wider ethical and political challenges regarding who has the power or 'standing' to participate in this process of evaluation, as well as how multiple preferences are measured and aggregated.

    “Questions such as this are inevitably intertwined with wider ethical and political challenges regarding who has the power or “standing” to participate in this process of evaluation, as well as how multiple preferences are measured and aggregated, as Baum’s trichotomic framework outlines (Baum 2017).”

    From How to Design AI for Social Good: Seven Essential Factors (2020) · cites this paper as Baum 2017

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baum, S. D.
Corresponding author
Baum, Seth D.
Venue
AI & SOCIETY
Published
2016-09-28
Volume
32
Issue
4
Pages
543-551
ISSN
  • 0951-5666 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-5655
OpenAlex
W3123136996
Cited by
113
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1
FWCI
14.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • AI & Society (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems
Keywords
AI safety, AI alignment, intrinsic motivation, societal impact of AI

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review