The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Taking Rights Seriously
Abstract
Introduction 1. Jurisprudence 2. The Model of Rules I 3. The Model of Rules II 4. Hard Cases 5. Constitutional Cases 6. Justice and Rights 7. Taking Rights Seriously 8. Civil Disobedience 9. Reverse Discrimination 10. Liberty and Moralism 11. Liberty and Liberalism 12. What Rights Do We Have? 13. Can Rights be Controversial? Appendix: A Reply to Critics Index
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
‘Hypernudge’: big Data as a mode of regulation by design
Yeung, K. (2017) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2016.1186713 · Cited by 868
Making and Breaking Social Capital: The Impact of Welfare-State Institutions
Kumlin, S., & Rothstein, B. (2005) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414004273203 · Cited by 599
Transparency in Algorithmic and Human Decision-Making: Is There a Double Standard?
Zerilli, J., Knott, A., Maclaurin, J., & Gavaghan, C. (2019) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-018-0330-6 · Cited by 420
Disability in a Human Rights Context
Degener, T. (2016) · Laws · doi:10.3390/laws5030035 · Cited by 367
Formal and substantive conceptions of the rule of law: an analytical framework
Craig, P. (2017) · The Rule of Law and the Separation of Powers · doi:10.4324/9781315085302-4 · Cited by 312
Algorithmic regulation and the rule of law
Hildebrandt, M. (2018) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2017.0355 · Cited by 222
Loyens, K., & Maesschalck, J. (2010) · Administration & Society · doi:10.1177/0095399710362524 · Cited by 142
Ranerup, A., & Henriksen, H. Z. (2022) · Social Science Computer Review · doi:10.1177/0894439320980434 · Cited by 139
Dimensions of Discretion: Specifying the Object of Street-Level Bureaucracy Research
Hupe, P. (2013) · dms – der moderne staat – Zeitschrift für Public Policy, Recht und Management · doi:10.3224/dms.v6i2.10 · Cited by 127
Questioning the New Liberal Dilemma: Immigrants, Social Networks, and Institutional Fairness
Kumlin, S., & Rothstein, B. (2010) · Comparative Politics · doi:10.5129/001041510x12911363510394 · Cited by 78
Towards a Sociological Theory of Discretion
CAMPBELL, E. (1999) · International Journal of the Sociology of Law · doi:10.1006/ijsl.1999.0082 · Cited by 70
A glossary of policy frameworks: the many forms of ‘universalism’ and policy ‘targeting’
Carey, G., & Crammond, B. (2017) · Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech-2014-204311 · Cited by 66
Computer Ethics and Moral Methodology
Van Den Hoven, J. (1997) · Metaphilosophy · doi:10.1111/1467-9973.00053 · Cited by 62
Equity, Equal Opportunity, and Education
Burbules, N. C., Lord, B. T., & Sherman, A. L. (1982) · Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis · doi:10.3102/01623737004002169 · Cited by 33
Algorithms and the individual in criminal law
Jorgensen, R. (2022) · Canadian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1017/can.2021.28 · Cited by 18
Ethics of AI and Health Care: Towards a Substantive Human Rights Framework
Liao, S. M. (2023) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-023-09911-8 · Cited by 17
Reflections on comparative law methodology – getting inside contract law
Valcke, C. (2012) · Practice and Theory in Comparative Law · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511863301.002 · Cited by 11
Beyond ‘police discretion’: The need for a new conceptual vocabulary
Turner, E. R., & Rowe, M. (2026) · Theoretical Criminology · doi:10.1177/13624806241297311 · Cited by 5
The Potential of the Legal Capacity Law Reform in Peru to Transform Mental Health Provision
Encalada, A. V. (2021) · Mental Health, Legal Capacity, and Human Rights · doi:10.1017/9781108979016.011 · Cited by 2
Yamin, A. E. (2021) · Mental Health, Legal Capacity, and Human Rights · doi:10.1017/9781108979016.004 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Coleman, J. L., & Dworkin, R. M.
- Venue
- California Law Review
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1978-07
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 885
- ISSN
- 0008-1221 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2122165510
- Cited by
- 5,460
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 427.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
