Cited by 737Legal processes and jurisprudenceLegal principles and applicationsLegal and Constitutional Studies

A Theory of Procedure

Open access
Thibaut, John, Walker, Laurens·1978·California Law Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3480099

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Feeling that one's voice has been heard and taken seriously is integral to procedural justice and police legitimacy.

    “Feeling that one's voice has been heard and taken seriously is, as discussed earlier, integral to procedural justice and police legitimacy (Paternoster et al., 1997; see also Thibaut & Walker, 1978).”
  • Citizens value police professionalism and tend to feel better about brushes with the criminal justice system when they believe they were treated fairly.

    “Citizens value police professionalism (Cheurprakobkit & Bartsch, 2001) and tend to feel better about brushes with the criminal justice system, in general, when they believe that they were treated fairly (Thibaut & Walker, 1978; see also Casper, Tyler, & Fisher, 1988;McEwen & Maiman, 1984;Tyler, 1984).”

Authors
Thibaut, J., & Walker, L.
Venue
California Law Review
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1978-05
Volume
66
Issue
3
Pages
541
ISSN
0008-1221 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4250200506
Cited by
737
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 28
FWCI
81.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • California Law Review (publishedVersion)
  • bepress Legal Repository (submittedVersion)
  • California Law Review
  • UC Berkeley
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Legal processes and jurisprudence
  • Social Sciences › Law › Legal principles and applications
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Legal and Constitutional Studies
Keywords
procedures, legal theory, court proceedings

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review