Cited by 297Psychometric Methodologies and TestingAttachment and Relationship DynamicsFamily Dynamics and Relationships

A psychometric evaluation of the Spanier dyadic adjustment scale

Sharpley, C. F., Cross, D. G.·1982·Journal of Marriage and the Family

Abstract

ence to the similarity (101 vs., 108) between(he mean score originally obtained by Spanierand that of the present sample. (The limita¬tions of this aspect of the data analysis areobvious; but as an exploratory measure, thisprocedure was utilized. As will be seen below,the principal use of this data was to extractthose items which could be most powerfullyused to form a separate instrument.)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/351594

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sharpley, C. F., & Cross, D. G.
Affiliations
University of New England (AU)
Venue
Journal of Marriage and the Family
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1982-08
Volume
44
Issue
3
Pages
739
ISSN
0022-2445 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2044188601
Cited by
297
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 9
FWCI
5.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Marriage and the Family (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
Keywords
dyadic adjustment, marital adjustment, psychometric assessment, scale validation, item selection, marital satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review