The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Habitat Connectivity, Habitat Continuity, and Metapopulations in Dynamic Landscapes
Abstract
Landscape ecology and metapopulation ecology share a common interest in developing measures that describe the structure of heterogeneous landscapes, but the specific aim in metapopulation ecology is to construct measures that help predict the dynamics of species with information about the structure of fragmented landscapes. The amount of habitat that individuals in a metapopulation have access to can be divided into four components, the amount of habitat in the present habitat patch (A i ), the amount of connected habitat in other patches available via migration (Γ i ), the amount of preserved habitat in the present patch after time period Δt(A' i ), and the amount of linked habitat in other patches after time period Δt(Γ' i ). Deterministic threshold conditions for metapopulation persistence in patch networks can be approximated with these quantities. For instance, in a version of the Levins model with extinction risk proportional to the inverse of patch area and colonization probability proportional to patch connectivity, the threshold condition for metapopulation persistence is given by ΓA + Var(Γ A)/ΓA >e/c, where e and c are the species-specific extinction and colonization parameters. I conjecture that with measures A' and Γ' the threshold condition for metapopulation persistence can be extended to dynamic landscapes, in which all or part of population turnover is caused by turnover in the habitat patches themselves. The measures of habitat availability described in this paper can be used to rank dissimilar fragmented landscapes in terms of their capacity to support a viable metapopulation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The application of ‘least-cost’ modelling as a functional landscape model
Adriaensen, F., Chardon, J. P., De Blust, G., Swinnen, E., Villalba, S., Gulinck, H., & Matthysen, E. (2003) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/s0169-2046(02)00242-6 · Cited by 1,342
Individual dispersal, landscape connectivity and ecological networks
Baguette, M., Blanchet, S., Legrand, D., Stevens, V. M., & Turlure, C. (2013) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12000 · Cited by 714
Rapid transcriptome characterization for a nonmodel organism using 454 pyrosequencing
VERA, J. C., WHEAT, C. W., FESCEMYER, H. W., FRILANDER, M. J., CRAWFORD, D. L., HANSKI, I., & MARDEN, J. H. (2008) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2008.03666.x · Cited by 714
Self-citationSIMPLE CONNECTIVITY MEASURES IN SPATIAL ECOLOGY
Moilanen, A., & Nieminen, M. (2002) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[1131:scmise]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 709
Landscape connectivity and animal behavior: functional grain as a key determinant for dispersal
Baguette, M., & Van Dyck, H. (2007) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10980-007-9108-4 · Cited by 608
Metadata
- Authors
- Hanski, I.
- Venue
- Oikos
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1999-11
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 209
- ISSN
- 0030-1299 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2318691603
- Cited by
- 626
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Habitat Connectivity, Habitat Continuity, and Metapopulations in Dynamic Landscapes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3546736
- The paper
- Hanski, I. (1999). Habitat Connectivity, Habitat Continuity, and Metapopulations in Dynamic Landscapes. Oikos. https://doi.org/10.2307/3546736
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.