The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Group Foraging, Public Information, and Patch Estimation
Abstract
L'information publique est l'information sur la qualite d'une parcelle qui peut etre obtenue par l'observation du succes d'approvisionnement des autres individus de cette parcelle.L'auteur etudie l'influence de l'utilisation de cette information publique sur les decisions d'abandon de parcelle et sur l'efficacite alimentaire des membres d'un groupe.Quand un groupe abandonne un site lorsqu'un premier individu le quitte,l'information publique peut prevenir la sous-utilisation des ressources
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Patch use as an indicator of habitat preference, predation risk, and competition
Brown, J. S. (1988) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/bf00395696 · Cited by 1,401
Pulliam, H. R. (1973) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(73)90184-7 · Cited by 1,322
THE IMPORTANCE OF CERTAIN ASSEMBLAGES OF BIRDS AS “INFORMATION‐CENTRES” FOR FOOD‐FINDING
Ward, P., & Zahavi, A. (1973) · Ibis · doi:10.1111/j.1474-919x.1973.tb01990.x · Cited by 1,086
Producers and scroungers: A general model and its application to captive flocks of house sparrows
Barnard, C. J., & Sibly, R. M. (1981) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/s0003-3472(81)80117-0 · Cited by 766
The evolutionary advantages of group foraging
Clark, C. W., & Mangel, M. (1986) · Theoretical Population Biology · doi:10.1016/0040-5809(86)90024-9 · Cited by 636
Prey Distribution as a Factor Determining the Choice of Optimal Foraging Strategy
Iwasa, Y., Higashi, M., & Yamamura, N. (1981) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/283754 · Cited by 538
Fish in larger shoals find food faster
Pitcher, T. J., Magurran, A. E., & Winfield, I. J. (1982) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/bf00300175 · Cited by 537
Powell, G. V. N. (1974) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/s0003-3472(74)80049-7 · Cited by 491
Krebs, J. R. (1974) · Behaviour · doi:10.1163/156853974x00165 · Cited by 445
Foraging and Flocking Strategies: Information in an Uncertain Environment
Clark, C. W., & Mangel, M. (1984) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284228 · Cited by 444
Cited by
Laland, K. N. (2004) · Learning & Behavior · doi:10.3758/bf03196002 · Cited by 1,551
Information and its use by animals in evolutionary ecology
DALL, S., GIRALDEAU, L., OLSSON, O., MCNAMARA, J., & STEPHENS, D. (2005) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.01.010 · Cited by 1,374
Clobert, J., Le Galliard, J., Cote, J., Meylan, S., & Massot, M. (2009) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01267.x · Cited by 1,232
Potential disadvantages of using socially acquired information
Giraldeau, L., Valone, T. J., & Templeton, J. J. (2002) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2002.1065 · Cited by 560
Self-citationBuilding on the Ideal Free Distribution
Tregenza, T. (1995) · Advances in Ecological Research · doi:10.1016/s0065-2504(08)60067-7 · Cited by 332
Metadata
- Authors
- Valone, T. J.
- Venue
- Oikos
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1989-11
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 357
- ISSN
- 0030-1299 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2317515800
- Cited by
- 339
- References
- 33
- FWCI
- 1.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Group Foraging, Public Information, and Patch Estimation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3565621
- The paper
- Valone, T. J. (1989). Group Foraging, Public Information, and Patch Estimation. Oikos. https://doi.org/10.2307/3565621
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
