Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 178

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Writing in A Bilingual Program: The Relation of L1 and L2 Texts

Edelsky, Carole·1982·TESOL Quarterly

Abstract

This is a report on the relationship between first language and second language writing. Nine first, nine second, and eight third graders in a unique bilingual program (emphasizing writing, a whole-language approach to literacy, and literacy in the first language before second language literacy instruction is begun) provided the writing data. The L1/L2 writing relationship might be viewed as either interference of L1 with L2 writing or as application of L1 to L2 writing. Taking the second view, but given that texts written by the same child in Spanish and in English demonstrate both similarities and differences, the question remains: what is it that is applied? The answer: everything—from particular local hypotheses regarding spelling, to more global hypotheses regarding differential constraints on oral vs. written texts, to abstract processes for producing texts. Some factors that might influence the level of knowledge and hypotheses that are used in L2 writing are: the nature of the written systems of the two languages, the writer's proficiency in the L2, the nature of the literacy experience, sociolinguistic constraints, and the nature of the writing process itself.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3586793

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 178

Metadata

Authors
Edelsky, C.
Venue
TESOL Quarterly
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1982-06
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
211
ISSN
0039-8322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2088528212
Cited by
178
References
0
FWCI
28.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Writing in A Bilingual Program: The Relation of L1 and L2 Texts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3586793
The paper
Edelsky, C. (1982). Writing in A Bilingual Program: The Relation of L1 and L2 Texts. TESOL Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586793

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.