Cited by 296Philosophy and Theoretical ScienceEpistemology, Ethics, and MetaphysicsPhilosophy and History of Science

The harder problem of consciousness

Open access
Block, Ned·2002·The Journal of Philosophy

Abstract

The Harder Problem of Consciousness I The Hard Problem T. H. Huxley famously said ''How it is that anything so remarkable as a state of consciousness comes about as a result of irritating nervous tissue, is just as unaccountable as the appearance of Djin when Aladdin rubbed his lamp.'' 1 We do not see how to explain a state of consciousness in terms of its neurological basis.This is the Hard Problem of Consciousness. 2 The aim of this paper is to present another problem of consciousness.The Harder Problem, as I will call it, is more epistemological than the Hard Problem.A second difference: the Hard Problem could arise for someone who has no conception of another person, whereas the Harder Problem is tied closely to the problem of other minds.Finally, the Harder Problem reveals an epistemic tension or at least discomfort in our ordinary conception of consciousness that is not suggested by the Hard Problem, and so in one respect it is harder.Perhaps the Harder Problem includes the Hard Problem and is best thought of as an epistemic add-on to it.Or perhaps they are in some other way facets of a single problem.Then my point is that this single problem breaks into two parts, one of which is more epistemic, involves other minds, and involves an epistemic discomfort. II PreliminariesI believe that the major ontological disputes about the nature of consciousness rest on an opposition between two perspectives: n Deflationism about consciousness, in which a priori or at least armchair analyses of consciousness (or at least armchair-sufficient conditions) are given in nonphenomenal terms, most prominently in terms of representation, thought, or function.n Phenomenal realism, which consists in the denial of deflationism plus the claim that consciousness is something real.Phenomenal realism is metaphysical realism about (AutoPDF V7 9/1/07 10:38) MIT (Stone 7Â9") StoneSerif&Sans J-1567 Block AC1: WSL 03/01/2007 pp.397-434 1567_20 (p.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3655621

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. also see Gu ¨ven Gu ¨zeldere, ''The Many Faces of Consciousness: A Field Guide,'' in Ned Block, Owen Flanagan, and Gu ¨ven Gu ¨zeldere, eds., The Nature of Consciousness: Philosophical Debates, 1-67, (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997), note 6.
  2. See Thomas Nagel, ''What is it like to be a bat?'', Philosophical Review 83 (1974): 435-450.
  3. Joe Levine introduced the ''explanatory-gap'' terminology to be used later; see his ''Materialism and qualia: The explanatory gap,'' Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 64 (1983): 354-361.
  4. Galen Strawson, Mental Reality (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1994), 93-96.
  5. We can reasonably wonder how it is that Mark Twain and Samuel Clemens married women with the same name, lived in the same city, and so on. But we cannot reasonably wonder how it is that Mark Twain is Samuel Clemens. Imagine two groups of historians in the distant future find- ing a correlation between events in the life of Clemens and Twain. The identity explains such cor- relations, but it cannot itself be questioned. This point is made in Ned Block, ''Reductionism,'' Encyclopedia of Bioethics, 1419-1424 (New York: Macmillan, 1978). See also Ned Block and Robert Stalnaker, ''Conceptual Analysis and the Explanatory Gap,'' Philosophical Review 108 (1999): 1-46;
  6. David Papineau, ''Consciousness, Physicalism and the Antipathetic Fallacy,'' Australasian Journal of Philosophy 71 (1993): 169-183. For a statement of a contrary view, see Chalmers, op. cit.
  7. Purple Haze (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).
  8. The articles by Paul Churchland, Brian Loar, William Lycan, and Robert van Gulick in Block, Flanagan, and Gu ¨zeldere, op. cit., all take something like this line. So also do Scott Sturgeon, ''The Epistemic View of Subjectivity,'' The Journal of Philosophy 91/5 (1994): 221-235, as well as Perry, op. cit.
  9. Ned Block, ''Troubles with Functionalism,'' in C. W. Savage, ed., Minnesota Studies in the Phi- losophy of Science, vol. 9, 261-325 (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1978).
  10. Capitan and D. Merrill, eds., Art, Mind, and Religion (Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press, 1967);
  11. David Lewis, ''Mad Pain and Martian Pain,'' in N. Block, ed., Readings in Philosophy of Psychol- ogy, vol. 1 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980). Actually, Lewis's view is even weirder than I mention in the text. In Lewis's view, a creature that is both physically (and therefore func- tionally) just like us and that is now undergoing a state physically and functionally like one of our pains does not have pain if it is determinately a member of an appropriately different population. See Sydney Shoemaker's convincing refutation of Lewis, ''Some Varieties of Functionalism,'' Philo- sophical Topics 12/1 (1981): 357-381.
  12. The Journal of Philosophy 97/7 (2000): 365-386.
  13. Stephen White, ''Curse of the Qualia,'' Synthese 68 (1983): 333-368. Reprinted in Block, Flana- gan, and Gu ¨zeldere, op. cit. The DNA issue is also mentioned in the version of Shoemaker's ''The Inverted Spectrum,'' in Block, Flanagan, and Gu ¨zeldere, op. cit., 653-654.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Block, N.
Corresponding author
Block, Ned
Venue
The Journal of Philosophy
Published
2002-08
Volume
99
Issue
8
Pages
391
ISSN
0022-362X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2008992674
Cited by
296
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 9
FWCI
12.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Philosophy (publishedVersion)
  • PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
Keywords
hard problem of consciousness, other minds, epistemology of consciousness, phenomenal consciousness, nature of consciousness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review