Cited by 143Philosophy and Theoretical ScienceTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchMental Health and Psychiatry

The vegetative state and the science of consciousness

Open access
Shea, Nicholas, Bayne, Tim·2010·The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science

Abstract

Consciousness in experimental subjects is typically inferred from reports and other forms of voluntary behaviour. A wealth of everyday experience confirms that healthy subjects do not ordinarily behave in these ways unless they are conscious. Investigation of consciousness in vegetative state patients has been based on the search for neural evidence that such broad functional capacities are preserved in some vegetative state patients. We call this the standard approach. To date, the results of the standard approach have suggested that some vegetative state patients might indeed be conscious, although they fall short of being demonstrative. The fact that some vegetative state patients show evidence of consciousness according to the standard approach is remarkable, for the standard approach to consciousness is rather conservative, and leaves open the pressing question of how to ascertain whether patients who fail such tests are conscious or not. We argue for a cluster-based 'natural kind' methodology that is adequate to that task, both as a replacement for the approach that currently informs research into the presence or absence of consciousness in vegetative state patients and as a methodology for the science of consciousness more generally.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bjps/axp046

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A third strategy for validating a putative C-test is to treat consciousness as a natural kind.

    “A third strategy for validating a putative C-test involves treating consciousness as a natural kind [67,68].”

    From Tests for consciousness in humans and beyond (2024) · cites this paper as [68]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 89 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Owen AM Coleman MR Boly M Davis MH Laureys S Pickard JD Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Detect Covert Awareness in the Vegetative State Archives of Neurology 2007b 64 1098 102 17698699

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shea, N., & Bayne, T.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
Published
2010-09-01
Volume
61
Issue
3
Pages
459-484
ISSN
  • 0007-0882 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3537
OpenAlex
W2106826983
Cited by
143
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
FWCI
7.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (086041)
  • University of Oxford
  • Australian Research Council (DP0984572)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
vegetative state, consciousness, consciousness studies, natural kinds, clustering, consciousness assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review