The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Impact of the Disclosure of the Environmental Effects of Organizational Behavior on the Market
Abstract
Corporations interact with their environment. Guiding their behavior is the goal of maximizing shareholder wealth, an objective which is not obviously affected by social costs associated with pollution and other externalities [2]. These social costs should be identified, measured and reported if corporations are to fulfill their social as well as their shareholder responsibilities [1]. The accounting profession has taken few positive steps to report social costs and the expenditures made by corporations to reduce them. However, the 1970-71 annual reports of companies in industries as diverse as chemical, food, petroleum, and pulp and paper do include information on pollution control either in the president's letter or in the review of operations. This disclosure suggests that the managers of some corporations see an advantage in making these expenditures and see some reason for disclosing that information to investors. The pollution abatement expenditures are not trivial. For some large firms they may reach to 4% of sales and 10% of capital investment [10]. In the steel industry, the abatement costs are reported to be as high as 25% of capital investment [4]. Their size supports the conclusion that these expenditures provide material information to investors. The information is essential if investors are
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis
Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840603024003910 · Cited by 7,641
Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business
Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3556659 · Cited by 5,130
STAKEHOLDER MISMATCHING: A THEORETICAL PROBLEM IN EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON CORPORATE SOCIAL PERFORMANCE
Wood, D. J., & Jones, R. E. (1995) · The International Journal of Organizational Analysis · doi:10.1108/eb028831 · Cited by 1,069
The Link Between Corporate Social and Financial Performance: Evidence from the Banking Industry
Simpson, W. G., & Kohers, T. (2002) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1023/a:1013082525900 · Cited by 917
Pava, M. L., & Krausz, J. (1996) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/bf00382958 · Cited by 883
CSR disclosure: the more things change…?
Cho, C. H., Michelon, G., Patten, D. M., & Roberts, R. W. (2015) · Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal · doi:10.1108/aaaj-12-2013-1549 · Cited by 413
An investigation of corporate social responsibility reputation and economic performance
Herremans, I. M., Akathaporn, P., & McInnes, M. (1993) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/0361-3682(93)90044-7 · Cited by 391
Impact of CSR disclosure on profitability and firm performance of Malaysian halal food companies
Ahmad, Z., Hidthiir, M. H. B., & Rahman, M. M. (2024) · Discover Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s43621-024-00189-3 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Belkaoui, A.
- Venue
- Financial Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1976
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 26
- ISSN
- 0046-3892 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2034097946
- Cited by
- 358
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.