The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effects of Sample Size on Kernel Home Range Estimates
Abstract
D. Erran Seaman, Joshua J. Millspaugh, Brian J. Kernohan, Gary C. Brundige, Kenneth J. Raedeke, Robert A. Gitzen, Effects of Sample Size on Kernel Home Range Estimates, The Journal of Wildlife Management, Vol. 63, No. 2 (Apr., 1999), pp. 739-747
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“After applying the above filters, only individuals with ≥50 telemetry points were included, in order to reduce the effects of small sample sizes on home range estimates [15].”
From Landscape Analysis of Adult Florida Panther Habitat (2015) · cites this paper as [15]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 701–800 of 904
Dynamics of animal joint space use: a novel application of a time series approach
French, J. T., Wang, H., Grant, W. E., & Tomeček, J. M. (2019) · Movement Ecology · doi:10.1186/s40462-019-0183-3 · Cited by 9
Non‐native grasses reduce scaled quail habitat
Fulbright, T., Kline, H. N., Wester, D., Grahmann, E. D., Herna'ndez, F., Brennan, L., & Hehman, M. W. (2019) · Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.1002/jwmg.21731 · Cited by 7
Wilmet, L., Beudels‐Jamar, R., Schwitzer, C., Rakotondrainibe, H. H., Devillers, P., & Vermeulen, C. (2019) · American Journal of Primatology · doi:10.1002/ajp.23017 · Cited by 7
Rouco, C., Barrio, I., Cirilli, F., Tortosa, F. S., & Villafuerte, R. (2019) · Mammalian Biology · doi:10.1016/j.mambio.2019.01.006 · Cited by 7
Chang, A., & Wiebe, K. (2018) · doi:10.1111/jofo.12244 · Cited by 7
Chang, A. M., & Wiebe, K. L. (2018) · Canadian Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1139/cjz-2017-0280 · Cited by 7
“This amount of time provided at least 40 spatial locations which is generally regarded as a sufficient sample size for calculating home range size (e.g. Seaman et al. 1999).”
Movements of dingoes on K’gari-Fraser Island: implications for management
Baxter, G., & Davies, N. (2018) · doi:10.1080/14486563.2017.1397062 · Cited by 7
Diggins, C. A., Silvis, A., Kelly, C., & Ford, W. (2017) · Wildlife research (East Melbourne) · doi:10.1071/wr16203 · Cited by 7
Home Range Analysis of Three Midium-Sized Mammals in Sobaeksan National Park
Lee, H., Cha, J., Chung, C., Kim, Y.-C., Kim, S.-C., Kwon, G.-H., & Kim, J.-J. (2014) · doi:10.13087/kosert.2014.17.6.51 · Cited by 7
“Seaman et al. (1999)은 야생동물의 행동권 분석을 위해서는 최소 30개 이상의 위치자료를 이용해야 하며, 행동권의 오차를 최소화하기 위해서는 50개 이 상의 위치정보를 분석에 이용하는 것을 제안한 바 있다.”
Eads, D., Biggins, D., Livieri, T., & Millspaugh, J. (2014) · doi:10.2981/wlb.13070 · Cited by 7
Self-citationRasiulis, A. L. V., Schmelzer, I., & Wright, C. (2012) · Rangifer · doi:10.7557/2.32.2.2272 · Cited by 7
“Correspondingly, numerous efforts have been directed at determining the minimum number of fixes (e.g., Seaman et al., 1999) and the methods used to accurately describe a home range (Burgman & Fox, 2003; Laver & Kelley, 2008).”
MethodCoyote Capture Vulnerability Relative to Space use and Trap Density
Wilson, R. R., Young, J., & Shivik, J. (2011) · Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.1002/jwmg.95 · Cited by 7
Roberts, S. B., Jordan, J. D., Bettinger, P., & Warren, R. (2010) · doi:10.2193/2008-431 · Cited by 7
Awa, T., Burgess, M., & Norris, K. (2009) · doi:10.2989/ostrich.2009.80.3.4.967 · Cited by 7
“Kernel home ranges were computed with the Animal Movement extension to ArcView 3.2 (Hooge and Eichenlaub 1997) using the 95% fixed kernel estimator and least squares cross validation (LSCV) to determine the optimal smoothing parameter value (Worton 1989, Seaman et al. 1999).”
MethodInfluentialOptimal radio-tracking strategy — The best results with the least effort?
Kauhala, K., & Holmala, K. (2008) · Mammal Research · doi:10.1007/bf03195194 · Cited by 7
Spatial grouping in behaviourally solitary striped hyaenas, Hyaena hyaena
Wagner, A. P., Frank, L. G., & Creel, S. (2008) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.08.025 · Cited by 81
Wang, X.-X., Li, M., Fang, L., Chen, T., & Liu, W. (2024) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani14233381 · Cited by 6
“The bandwidth value was determined by performing the least-squares cross-validation procedure [39].”
Axel, A. C., Harshbarger, B. M., Lewis, R., & Tecot, S. R. (2024) · American Journal of Primatology · doi:10.1002/ajp.23617 · Cited by 6
“…season (as defined above), as well over each year to ensure sample size was sufficient to reach a home range size asymptote; the asymptote is the point on the curve at which additional locations result in a minimal increase in home range size (Harris et al., 1990; Hawes, 1977; Seaman et al., 1999).”
BackgroundAnderson, D., Latham, C., McClelland, P., & Latham, D. (2022) · New Zealand journal of ecology · doi:10.20417/nzjecol.47.3489 · Cited by 6
“Small sample sizes tend to overestimate kernel home range sizes (Seaman et al. 1999; Borger et al. 2006), so we discarded two pigs for which we had less than c. 40 locations (75 202 and 75 210; Fig.”
BackgroundLeaping and differential habitat use in sympatric tamarins in Amazonian Peru
Berles, P., Heymann, E., Golcher, F., & Nyakatura, J. (2021) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.1093/jmammal/gyab121 · Cited by 6
Territorial behavior of the migratory Lined Seedeater during the breeding season
Martins, G. D. M., Cunha, F. C. R., & Lopes, L. (2021) · Ornithology Research · doi:10.1007/s43388-021-00065-y · Cited by 6
Habitat and space use of wintering Sprague's Pipits (Anthus spragueii) in northern Mexico
Strasser, E. H., Ruvalcaba-Ortega, I., Peña-Peniche, A., Panjabi, A., Martínez-Guerrero, J. H., Canales-Del-Castillo, R., & Correll, M. D. (2019) · The Wilson Journal of Ornithology · doi:10.1676/18-17 · Cited by 6
Messinger, L. N., Stuber, E. F., Chizinski, C. J., & Fontaine, J. J. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0222272 · Cited by 8
“Recognizing kernel home range estimations are subject to error, especially with small sample sizes as those presented here [71], our goal was not to estimate and report the ‘true’ size of home ranges, but to measure relative changes in home range size or location between risk groups and seasons.”
BackgroundMapping bald eagle activity shadows around communal roosts
Watts, B., & Turrin, C. L. (2017) · doi:10.1002/jwmg.21263 · Cited by 6
“Weused90%kernels to estimate the extent of activity shadows around each roost becauseoutliershavebeen suggested tohave agreater influence on density isopleths for >90% KDE home range analyses (Seaman et al. 1999, Borger et al. 2006).”
BackgroundSpatial behaviour and food choice of the Garden Warbler Sylvia borin during the non-breeding season
Iwajomo, S., Ottosson, U., & Thorup, K. (2017) · doi:10.2989/00306525.2016.1221477 · Cited by 6
“Estimates derived based on the LSCV have been shown to have less bias compared with those for which the smoothing parameter was set at the ad hoc value href (e.g. Seaman and Powell 1996; Seaman et al. 1999).”
MethodInfluentialHe, X., Chen, M., & Zhang, E. (2016) · doi:10.1071/an14858 · Cited by 6
Spatial organization of the pale fox in the Termit Massif of east Niger
Sillero-Zubiri, C., Rostro-García, S., & Burruss, D. (2016) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.1093/jmammal/gyv198 · Cited by 6
“Home ranges were calculated for individuals that had a minimum of 30 independent locations (Seaman et al. 1999), these included telemetry locations and direct observations.”
BackgroundHome Ranges of Ishasha Lions: Size and Location in Relation to Habitat and Prey Availability
Mudumba, T., Omoya, E. O., Ziwa, J., & Plumptre, A. J. (2015) · Journal of East African Natural History · doi:10.2982/028.104.0115 · Cited by 5
Diurnal space use and seasonal movement patterns of greater sage‐grouse in Northeastern California
Davis, D., Reese, K., & Gardner, S. (2014) · doi:10.1002/wsb.467 · Cited by 6
Home-Range Size and Subadult Dispersal of Black Bears in the Cascade Range of Western Oregon
Immell, D., Jackson, D. H., & Boulay, M. C. (2014) · doi:10.3398/064.074.0308 · Cited by 6
“We calculated home ranges only for bears that were monitored for ≥ 1 year and had ≥ 30 total locations (Seaman et al. 1999).”
Davis, R., David, J., Meÿer, M., Sekiguchi, K., Best, P. B., Dassis, M., & Rodríguez, D. (2014) · doi:10.2989/1814232x.2014.973903 · Cited by 6
“For kernel-based methods such as LoCoH, a minimum of 30 (or preferably >50) observations per individual has been suggested (Seaman et al. 1999), so one dolphin (H2) was excluded from this analysis.”
MethodFall movements of Red-headed Woodpeckers in South Carolina
Vukovich, M., & Kilgo, J. (2013) · doi:10.1111/jofo.12018 · Cited by 6
“We acknowledge that the kernel estimator is sensitive to small sample sizes of relocations (Seaman et al. 1999), but our sample was limited by the duration of the period between migration and transmitter battery failure, combined with the need to maintain temporal independence between observations.”
BackgroundMethodYang, N., Zhang, K., Lloyd, H., Ran, J., Xu, Y., Du, B.-B., Yue, B., Wang, Y., & Klaus, S. (2011) · doi:10.5253/078.099.0210 · Cited by 6
“Only groups with >30 fixes were used for the analysis (Seaman et al. 1999).”
Methodde Barros, F. D., Granzinolli, M., Pereira, R. J., & Motta-Junior, J. (2010) · doi:10.1080/00222933.2010.520756 · Cited by 6
“Only individuals with more than 50 radio-locations were included in the analyses (Seaman et al. 1999).”
MethodColeman, J. C., & Downs, C. (2010) · doi:10.1080/15627020.2010.11657268 · Cited by 6
SPATIAL ORGANISATION OF BADGERS (MELES MELES) IN A MEDIUM-DENSITY POPULATION IN LUXEMBOURG
Frantz, A. C., Schley, L., Schaul, M., Balestrieri, A., & Roper, T. J. (2010) · Bollettino del CILEA (CILEA) · doi:10.4404/hystrix-21.1-4482 · Cited by 5
“As suggested by Seaman and Powell (1996), Powell et al. (1997), Seaman et al. (1998, 1999) and Powell (2000), optimal bandwidths were determined using the LSCV technique.”
Seki, Y., & Koganezawa, M. (2010) · doi:10.20652/abm.46.2_69 · Cited by 6
Using Subpopulation Structure for Barren-Ground Grizzly Bear Management
Edwards, M., Nagy, J., & Derocher, A. (2008) · doi:10.2192/1537-6176-19.2.91 · Cited by 6
“Seaman et al. (1999) found that the least-square cross-validation value was approximately 50% of the reference value; therefore, we used this as our starting h value and increased or decreased h until we achieved a utilization distribution where the 95% fixed kernel was one complete isopleth.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe Viggers & Hearn conundrum: a kangaroo home range study with no implications for land management
Martin, J. K., Coulson, G., Stefano, J. D., Ritchie, E., Greenfield, A., Catanchin, H., & Evans, L. (2007) · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01309.x · Cited by 6
Verheijen, B. H. F., Webb, E. B., Brasher, M., & Hagy, H. (2024) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.11331 · Cited by 5
“…an unbiased estimate of space use, while 50% and 95% isopleths provide unbiased estimates of the core area and overall space use, respectively, with the latter excluding only locations from rarely used areas (Fletcher Jr. & Koford, 2003; Seaman et al., 1999; Seaman & Powell, 1996; Worton, 1989).”
MethodStalker, J. B., Jones, J. L., Hromada, S. J., Nussear, K. E., Vandergast, A. G., Wood, D. A., Tracy, C. R., & Gienger, C. M. (2023) · Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1111/jzo.13118 · Cited by 6
Heit, D. R., Wilmers, C., Ortiz-Calo, W., & Montgomery, R. (2023) · Oikos · doi:10.1111/oik.09820 · Cited by 5
Winter space use and sex ratios of Chestnut-collared Longspurs (Calcarius ornatus) in Oklahoma
Muller, J. A., Perera, N., & Ross, J. (2022) · The Wilson Journal of Ornithology · doi:10.1676/20-00119 · Cited by 5
“Yet MCP typically overestimates home range size because of sample bias; that is, home range increases with the number of locations plotted (Turner et al. 1969) and through the outsized impact of outliers (Seaman et al. 1999).”
BackgroundHaverland, A. A., Green, M., Weckerly, F., & Wilson, J. K. (2021) · Waterbirds (De Leon Springs, Fla.) · doi:10.1675/063.044.0209 · Cited by 5
“The number of geographic locations required for a robust estimate of home range has long been an important question in spatial ecology (Odum and Kuenzler 1955; Seaman et al. 1999; Börger et al. 2006).”
BackgroundLamamy, C., Delgado, M. D. M., Kojola, I., Heikkinen, S., & Penteriani, V. (2021) · Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1111/jzo.12938 · Cited by 5
Kachamakova, M., & Koshev, Y. (2021) · doi:10.1016/j.jnc.2021.126048 · Cited by 5
Breeding-Season Survival, Home-Range Size, and Habitat Selection of Female Bachman's Sparrows
Choi, D. Y., Fish, A. C., Moorman, C., DePerno, C., & Schillaci, J. M. (2021) · Southeastern naturalist (Steuben, Me.) · doi:10.1656/058.020.0112 · Cited by 5
Survival of Sharp‐Tailed Grouse Under Variable Livestock Grazing Management
Milligan, M., Berkeley, L. I., & McNew, L. (2020) · Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.1002/jwmg.21909 · Cited by 5
Survival of white-tailed deer fawns in central Iowa
McGovern, P., Dinsmore, S., & Blanchong, J. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0229242 · Cited by 5
Space Use by Prairie Warblers in Regenerating Mixed-oak Forests of Central Pennsylvania
Can, M., Fiss, C. J., Mcneil, D. J., & Larkin, J. L. (2019) · Northeastern Naturalist · doi:10.1656/045.026.0413 · Cited by 5
Marçal, B. D. F., & Lopes, L. (2019) · Journal of Natural History · doi:10.1080/00222933.2019.1704899 · Cited by 5
“Only those individuals with at least ~30 locations were considered for further analysis because a small number of locations often produces biased estimates (Seaman et al. 1999; Fieberg and Börger 2012).”
BackgroundFreitas, G. H. S., Costa, L. M., & Rodrigues, M. (2019) · Journal of field ornithology · doi:10.1111/jofo.12308 · Cited by 5
Ryberg, W., Garrett, T. B., Adams, C. S., Campbell, T., Walkup, D., Johnson, T. E., & Hibbitts, T. J. (2019) · Journal of Natural History · doi:10.1080/00222933.2019.1668491 · Cited by 5
“The least-squares cross validation (LSCV) method of selecting the smoothing parameter, recommended by Seaman et al. (1999) failed to minimise the Mean Integrated Squared Error (MISE) for most lizards; therefore we used the reference bandwidth instead.”
MethodIsland fox spatial ecology and implications for management of disease
Resnik, J., Andelt, W. F., Stanley, T., & Snow, N. P. (2018) · Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.1002/jwmg.21464 · Cited by 5
“We estimated seasonal home ranges and seasonal core areas for foxes with 30 observations in a given season (Seaman et al. 1999, Kernohan et al. 2001) and located >66% of the season.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialJuvenile Steller sea lion (Eumetopias jubatus) utilization distributions in the Gulf of Alaska
Bishop, A. M., Brown, C. L., Rehberg, M. J., Torres, L. G., & Horning, M. (2018) · Movement Ecology · doi:10.1186/s40462-018-0124-6 · Cited by 7
“Therefore, in order to meet the minimum sample size requirements of kernel density analysis and ensure a reasonable representation of space use without bias from interpolation [55], only bi-monthly samples with > 50 pseudolocations, and where the pseudolocation to raw location ratio was < 3 were included in analysis o…”
Fitterer, J. L., Nelson, T., & Stockwell, T. (2017) · Applied Geography · doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2017.08.002 · Cited by 5
Habitat Use and Foraging Behavior of Eastern Bluebirds (Sialia sialis) in Relation to Winter Weather
Weinkam, T. J., Janos, G. A., & Brown, D. R. (2017) · Northeastern Naturalist · doi:10.1656/045.024.s704 · Cited by 5
“We depicted a home-range boundary as the 95% isopleth of the kernel probability density function (Seaman et al. 1999).”
Gyrfalcon Home Ranges and Movements on the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta, Alaska
Eisaguirre, J., Booms, T. L., and, P. F. S., & Lewis, S. B. (2016) · doi:10.3356/rapt-50-01-109-114.1 · Cited by 5
“…kernel) methods for discussing space use because they yield homerange estimates with less bias than other methods and are relatively robust to small sample sizes (i.e., number of locations used to generate kernel density estimates; Seaman and Powell 1996, Seaman et al. 1999, Powell 2000).”
MethodPetersen, M., Byrd, G. V., Sonsthagen, S., & Sexson, M. (2015) · doi:10.1111/jav.00626 · Cited by 5
Responses of Female White-Tailed Deer Home-Ranges to Increased Resource Availability
Crimmins, S., Edwards, J., Campbell, T., Ford, W., Keyser, P., Miller, B. F., & Miller, K. (2015) · doi:10.1656/045.022.0215 · Cited by 5
“We calculated seasonal home ranges and core areas for animals with ≥30 locations in a season (Seaman et al. 1999).”
MethodA time geographic approach for delineating areas of sustained wildlife use
Nelson, T., Long, J., Laberee, K., & Stewart, B. (2015) · Ann. GIS · doi:10.1080/19475683.2014.992366 · Cited by 5
Eads, D., Jachowski, D., Biggins, D., Livieri, T., Matchett, M., & Millspaugh, J. (2012) · Western North American Naturalist · doi:10.3398/064.072.0210 · Cited by 5
Self-citationSpatial Ecology of Breeding Least Bitterns in Northwest Missouri
Griffin, A., Durbian, F., Easterla, D. A., & Bell, R. L. (2009) · doi:10.1676/07-164.1 · Cited by 5
“The smoothing parameter for all FKHRUD calculations was selected using least squares cross validation (Silverman 1986, Seaman and Powell 1996, Seaman et al. 1999).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialJohnson, M., Conklin, J., Johnson, B., Mccaffery, B., Haig, S., & Walters, J. (2009) · doi:10.1676/08-010.1 · Cited by 5
“Small sample sizes prohibited use of the most accurate home range estimation methods currently available (e.g., kernel methods, Seaman et al. 1999).”
MethodAdaptive behavioural strategies to seasonal challenges by a semiurban feral ungulate
Bhattacharjee, D., Flay, K., Mumby, H., & McElligott, A. (2026) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2025.123414 · Cited by 4
“A minimum sample size of 30 is recommended for the LSCV method (Seaman et al., 1999), whereas the HREF method can be applied based on at least a sample size of 10 (Webb et al., 2011).”
Lee, S., Oh, C., Cho, B., & Han, Y. (2024) · BMC Zoology · doi:10.1186/s40850-024-00220-0 · Cited by 4
“…of the classification criteria can be found in the research methods KDE uses the kernel function, one of the nonparametric methods of density estimation, which uses the density distribution graph obtained based on the location coordinates of wildlife and represents it as a line-like curve [29, 30].”
Betancourth-Cundar, M., Amézquita, A., & Cadena, C. D. (2024) · Evolutionary Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10682-024-10309-0 · Cited by 4
“…to the area of the territory and can be affected by sample size (Boulanger and White 1990 ; Seaman et al. 1999; Downs and Horner 2008), we set h ref as the smoothing parameter to define the width of each isopleth (Calenge 2006), as recommended when having < 50 observations (Seaman et al. 1999).”
InfluentialDensity and Home Range of Cats in a Small Inhabited Mediterranean Island
Molina-Bernabeu, S., & López-Iborra, G. (2024) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani14162288 · Cited by 4
“To estimate home ranges, the minimum convex polygon (MCP) method [44,62,63] was used both in the urban and scrubland areas.”
MethodIverson, A. R., Humple, D. L., Cormier, R. L., Hahn, T. P., Block, T. A., Shizuka, D., Lyon, B. E., Chaine, A., Hudson, E. J., & Hull, E. M. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0305369 · Cited by 4
Determinants of macaques' space use: A test for the ecological constraints model using GPS collars
Xie, P., Fan, Y., Chapman, C. A., Ma, C., Wu, C., Hu, P., Hu, L., & Fan, P. (2024) · American Journal of Primatology · doi:10.1002/ajp.23636 · Cited by 4
“Home ranges and core areas were calculated using kernel estimates with ad hoc for smoothing method, and each estimate obtained a minimum of 50 fixes (Seaman et al., 1999).”
Lu, Y., Xu, X.-R., Chen, B.-Y., Jefferson, T. A., Fearnbach, H., & Yang, G. (2024) · Zoological Research · doi:10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2023.255 · Cited by 4
“For the fixed kernel method, smoothing parameters were estimated using least-squares cross-validation, providing the least-biased estimates for the 95% and 50% habitat range areas (Seaman et al., 1999).”
Harris, S. N., Doonan, T., Ragheb, E. L. H., & Jachowski, D. (2023) · Mammalian Biology · doi:10.1007/s42991-023-00380-5 · Cited by 4
“We calculated 95% fixed-kernel density estimates (KDE) of home range size using a plug-in smoothing factor (Lesmeister et al. 2009) in the R package ‘adehabitatHR’ (Calenge 2021) for each skunk with ≥ 30 locations (Seaman et al. 1999).”
MethodSpatial acclimation of elk during population restoration to the Missouri Ozarks, USA
Pero, E. M., Palm, E. C., Chitwood, M., Hildreth, A., Keller, B. J., Sumners, J., Hansen, L., Isabelle, J., & Millspaugh, J. (2023) · Animal Conservation · doi:10.1111/acv.12866 · Cited by 4
“We estimated monthly range areas as the 95% isopleth of the estimated ODs for every individual for each monthly period containing more than 30 locations following release (Seaman et al ., 1999).”
BackgroundSelf-citationPetitet, R., Castilhos, J. C., & Bugoni, L. (2023) · Marine Biology · doi:10.1007/s00227-022-04169-x · Cited by 4
“Furthermore, this analysis performed well with multimodal data and can provide estimates based on specified contours (Börger et al. 2006; Seaman et al. 1999).”
MethodPostfledging survival and movements of juvenile Gray-backed Thrushes (Turdus hortulorum)
Zhou, B., Ye, H., Shi, J., Xia, C.-W., & Deng, W. (2022) · The Wilson Journal of Ornithology · doi:10.1676/20-00046 · Cited by 4
“We chose the MCP method over kernel estimators because the kernel method requires a minimum of 30 locations to produce reliable results and tended to overestimate the home range sizes when we used small sample sizes (Seaman et al. 1999, Boyle et al. 2009).”
MethodBooms, T. L., Paprocki, N., Eisaguirre, J., Barger, C. P., Lewis, S. B., & Breed, G. (2021) · The Journal of raptor research · doi:10.3356/jrr-20-81 · Cited by 4
Kvarnemo, C., Andersson, S., Elisson, J., Moore, G., & Jones, A. (2021) · Journal of ethology · doi:10.1007/s10164-021-00698-y · Cited by 4
Home Range Estimates and Habitat Use of Siberian Flying Squirrels in South Korea
Kim, J.-U., Kim, J.-S., Jeon, J.-H., & Lee, W.-S. (2020) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani10081378 · Cited by 4
Kenow, K., Fara, L. J., Houdek, S. C., Gray, B. R., Heard, D., Meyer, M., Fox, T. J., Kratt, R., Ford, S., Gendron‐Fitzpatrick, A., et al. (2020) · Journal of Avian Biology · doi:10.1111/jav.02609 · Cited by 4
Mwangi, J., Klaassen, R., Muchai, M., & Tieleman, B. (2020) · Ibis · doi:10.1111/ibi.12716 · Cited by 4
“Home-range size of individual birds and effect of sex on individual home-range We calculated individual home-range for 56 Redcapped Larks (31 males, 21 females, 4 not sexed) with more than 30 fixes (Seaman et al. 1999).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSilva, I., Crane, M., Marshall, B. M., & Strine, C. (2020) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2020.02.10.941278 · Cited by 4
“Hemson et al., (2015) suggest ignoring site fidelity in simulation studies leads to inappropriate conclusions advocating KDE LSCV ( e.g. Worton, 1995; Seaman & Powell, 1996; Seaman et al. , 1999).”
MethodBishop, A. M., Dubel, A. K., Sattler, R. L., Brown, C., & Horning, M. (2019) · Endangered Species Research · doi:10.3354/esr00999 · Cited by 4
Smith, K. J., Fleming, P. A., Kreplins, T., & Wilson, B. (2019) · Australian Mammalogy · doi:10.1071/am17061 · Cited by 4
Mosnier, A., Gosselin, J., Lawson, J. W., Plourde, S., & Lesage, V. S. (2018) · Canadian Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1139/cjz-2018-0167 · Cited by 6
Effects of patch-burn grazing on breeding density and territory size of Dickcissels
Verheijen, B. H. F., Clipp, H., Bartolo, A. J., Jensen, W. E., & Sandercock, B. (2019) · Avian Conservation and Ecology · doi:10.5751/ace-01343-140107 · Cited by 4
“Previous studies have shown that 20 unique locations and 95% surface areas can provide an unbiased estimate of territory size, while excluding outlying locations that are rarely used (Worton 1989, Seaman and Powell 1996, Seaman et al. 1999, Fletcher and Koford 2003).”
BackgroundSimulating detection-censored movement records for home range analysis planning
Wszola, L., Simonsen, V., Corral, L., Chizinski, C., & Fontaine, J. (2019) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.10.017 · Cited by 4
“imposed bias than other methods also corresponds with previous work (e.g., Börger et al., 2006; Seaman et al., 1999; Seaman and Powell, 1996).”
MethodResultResource selection and space use of Myotis evotis in a western juniper woodland in oregon
Anthony, C. R., & Sanchez, D. (2018) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.1093/jmammal/gyy150 · Cited by 4
Martin, T., & Buchholz, R. (2018) · The Condor · doi:10.1650/condor-18-100.1 · Cited by 4
Fluctuating food resources and home ranges in brown hyaenas living in a semi-arid environment
Maude, G., Reading, R., & Harris, S. (2018) · Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1111/jzo.12618 · Cited by 4
Kearns, L. J., & Rodewald, A. (2017) · The Condor · doi:10.1650/condor-17-23.1 · Cited by 4
Flint, P., & Meixell, B. W. (2017) · Waterbirds (De Leon Springs, Fla.) · doi:10.1675/063.040.0308 · Cited by 4
Shape complexity of space used by American black bears influenced by sex and intensity of use
Hiller, T. L., Beringer, J., & Belant, J. (2017) · doi:10.1016/j.baae.2016.08.002 · Cited by 4
Mate, I., Barrull, J., Ruiz-Olmo, J., Gosálbez, J., & Salicrú, M. (2016) · Mammal Research · doi:10.1007/s13364-016-0271-3 · Cited by 4
“For each situation studied (home range/sociability per individual and period), more than 50 locations were used and exceptionally (in tracking week to week) only between 30 and 50 locations were considered, which is the minimum number admissible (Seaman et al. 1999; Millspaugh et al. 2004).”
MethodRollinson, D., Coleman, J. C., & Downs, C. (2013) · doi:10.1080/15627020.2013.11407601 · Cited by 4
“One of the eight bats could not be used in this study, as a minimum of 30 GPS fixes were not obtained, resulting in an inaccurate prediction of home range size (Seaman et al. 1999).”
MethodCottone, A. M., & Bauer, A. (2013) · Copeia · doi:10.1643/ce-12-067 · Cited by 4
“However, this type of sampling is considered an appropriate trade-off in spatial ecology studies of shorter duration (see Seaman et al., 1999).”
BackgroundQuantifying Wildlife Home Range Changes
Nelson, T. (2011) · doi:10.5772/23978 · Cited by 4
“For home range delineation, the bandwidth size is typically selected via least-square cross-validation (LSCV) and a 95% threshold used to demarcate the home range boundary (Seaman & Powell, 1996; Seaman et al., 1999).”
Long‐distance post‐release movements challenge the metapopulation restoration of Bearded Vultures
Tréhin, C., Duriez, O., Sarrazin, F., Betton, B., Fonderflick, J., Loercher, F., Marlé, E., Seguin, J., Traversier, J., Ziletti, N., et al. (2024) · Ecosphere · doi:10.1002/ecs2.4856 · Cited by 3
Severe Disturbance of Chinese Pangolins Caused by Free-Ranging Domestic Dogs in Unprotected Areas
Zhang, Y.-L., Gao, H.-C., Dou, H., Yang, J., Wang, J., Xiang, Z.-F., & Hua, Y. (2024) · Diversity · doi:10.3390/d16070386 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Seaman, D. E., Millspaugh, J. J., Kernohan, B. J., Brundige, G. C., Raedeke, K. J., & Gitzen, R. A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Wildlife Management
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1999-04
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 739
- ISSN
- 0022-541X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2094014445
- Cited by
- 1,390
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 65 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 74 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 66 · 2016: 60 · 2015: 74 · 2014: 81 · 2013: 98 · 2012: 80
- FWCI
- 13.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Wildlife Management (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
- Keywords
- sample size, home range estimation, animal movement, home range size, GPS tracking, spatial autocorrelation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review