The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effects of Sample Size on Kernel Home Range Estimates
Abstract
D. Erran Seaman, Joshua J. Millspaugh, Brian J. Kernohan, Gary C. Brundige, Kenneth J. Raedeke, Robert A. Gitzen, Effects of Sample Size on Kernel Home Range Estimates, The Journal of Wildlife Management, Vol. 63, No. 2 (Apr., 1999), pp. 739-747
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“After applying the above filters, only individuals with ≥50 telemetry points were included, in order to reduce the effects of small sample sizes on home range estimates [15].”
From Landscape Analysis of Adult Florida Panther Habitat (2015) · cites this paper as [15]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 801–900 of 904
Habitat Use by the Rock-Dwelling Karoo Dwarf Tortoise, Chersobius boulengeri
Loehr, V. (2023) · Ichthyology & Herpetology · doi:10.1643/h2022059 · Cited by 3
“MCPs were selected as measure for home ranges due to relatively small sample sizes (Seaman et al., 1999; Boyle et al., 2009) and to facilitate comparison with previous work on congeneric Nama and Speckled Dwarf Tortoises ( C. solus and C. signatus , respectively; Cunningham and Simang, 2007; Loehr,…”
ResultYang, C.-C., Chen, X.-Y., Zhang, Z.-W., & Liang, W. (2023) · Ornithological science · doi:10.2326/osj.22.87 · Cited by 3
“The minimum convex polygon method is the oldest and most common method for estimating home ranges (White & Garrott 1990; Seaman et al. 1999).”
BackgroundMethodTerekhina, A., Filippova, V., Volkovitskiy, A., Shklyar, K., Orekhov, P., Sokolova, N. A., Abdulmanova, S., & Sokolov, A. (2022) · Human Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10745-022-00384-8 · Cited by 3
Bayrakcı, Y., Ayaz, D., & Luiselli, L. (2021) · Aquatic conservation · doi:10.1002/aqc.3698 · Cited by 3
Divergent movement patterns of adult and juvenile ‘Akohekohe, an endangered Hawaiian Honeycreeper
Wang, A. X., Paxton, E., Mounce, H. L., & Hart, P. (2020) · Journal of field ornithology · doi:10.1111/jofo.12348 · Cited by 3
Martins, G. D. M., Ferreira, D. D. F., Pacheco, S., Ribon, R., & Lopes, L. (2020) · doi:10.1080/00222933.2020.1830193 · Cited by 3
Rosoni, J. R. R., Krügel, M. M., Fontana, C. S., & Behr, E. R. (2019) · Ornitologia Neotropical · doi:10.58843/ornneo.v30i0.377 · Cited by 3
“…o menor polígono convexo incluindo todos os registros de localização dos indivíduos (Calenge 2015); (2) Estimação de Densidade de Kernel com 95% de confiança (EDK 95%), com a utilização do parâmetro de suavização de mínimos quadrados com validação cruzada (Seaman et al. 1999, Barg et al. 2005).”
Kouba, M., & Tomášek, V. (2018) · Slovak Raptor Journal · doi:10.2478/srj-2018-0004 · Cited by 3
Watkins, G. E., Willers, N., Raudino, H., Kinloch, J., & van Dongen, R. (2018) · Wildlife research (East Melbourne) · doi:10.1071/wr17102 · Cited by 3
“The fixed kernel with smoothing selected by LSCV is less biased than are adaptive kernels in estimating home–range area, has the smallest variance, and is one of the most commonly used and accurate estimators of home-range (Seaman and Powell 1996; Seaman et al. 1999; Powell 2000).”
MethodCarpenter, J. P., & Wang, Y. (2018) · doi:10.1111/jofo.12245 · Cited by 3
Home Range Size and Nocturnal Roost Locations of Western Chat-Tanagers (Calyptophilus tertius)
Rimmer, C., Johnson, P. L., & Lloyd, J. (2017) · The Wilson Journal of Ornithology · doi:10.1676/16-097.1 · Cited by 3
“Because of the dense habitat and challenging terrain at PUVI and PALO and the short period of time available for our field study, we were able to collect the recommended minimum of 30 diurnal location fixes for kernel home-range analysis from only five individuals (Seaman et al. 1999).”
MethodSpring and Winter Home Ranges of the Haida Gwaii Northern Saw-Whet Owl (Aegolius acadicus brooksi)
Waterhouse, F., Doyle, F., Turney, L., Wijdeven, B., Todd, M., Bergman, C., & Vennesland, R. G. (2017) · The Journal of raptor research · doi:10.3356/jrr-16-48.1 · Cited by 3
“…locations of the spring radio-tagged owls from 22 May 23 June 2011 (starting 9 11 d after tagging) and for the winter radio-tagged owls from 9 February 8 March 2012 (starting 1 2 d after tagging) with the goal of obtaining at least 30 locations per owl (Kenward 1987, Seaman et al. 1999).”
BackgroundCunningham, C. X., Prowse, T. A. A., Masters, P., & Cassey, P. (2016) · Australian Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1071/zo15045 · Cited by 5
“Kernel-based methods for home-range calculation are more accurate than alternative methods such as minimum convex polygons or harmonic means (Worton 1995; Swihart and Slade 1997; Seaman et al. 1999; Huck et al. 2008).”
BackgroundMethodKanda, L., & Hatzel, J. S. (2015) · Ethology Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1080/03949370.2014.928653 · Cited by 3
“We separately checked for any effect of number of locations used to generate a home range, as this can bias the size estimates (SEAMAN et al. 1999).”
MethodMarques-Santos, F., Wischhoff, U., & Rodrigues, M. (2014) · Brazilian journal of biology = Revista brasleira de biologia · doi:10.1590/1519-6984.02813 · Cited by 3
“The estimators were: (1) Kernel Density Estimator (KDE) by volume contouring of 95% (Worton, 1989) with fixed smoothing factor obtained by the least squares cross validation method (Seaman and Powell, 1996; Seaman et al., 1999); (2) Minimum Convex Polygon (MCP) with 100% of locations.”
MethodGreater Roadrunner (Geococcyx californianus) Home Range and Habitat Selection in West Texas
Montalvo, A. E., Ransom, D., & Lopez, R. R. (2014) · doi:10.3398/064.074.0205 · Cited by 3
Olson, E., Salomon, A., Wirsing, A., & Heithaus, M. (2012) · doi:10.1071/mf12030 · Cited by 3
“While 95 pvc areas are frequently used in animal space use studies (Seaman et al. 1999), I also chose to calculate 85 pvc activity spaces based on findings by Seaman et al. (1999) that estimates in the outer contours are less reliable than the inner contours and because of the trade-off between…”
MethodInfluentialAutomated Productivity Measurement Model of Two-dimensional Earthmoving-equipment Operations
Navon, R., Khoury, S., & Doytsher, Y. (2012) · doi:10.7492/ijaec.2012.018 · Cited by 3
“The first algorithm is called Minimum Convex Polygon (MCP) - this algorithm calculates the smallest convex polygon, which includes all the points (Seaman et al. 1999).”
MethodSpacing Pattern of the Crested Serpent-Eagle (Spilornis Cheela Hoya) in Southern Taiwan
Chou, T.-C., Walther, B., & Lee, P.-F. (2012) · doi:10.6165/tai.2012.57(1).1 · Cited by 3
“Since the fixed kernel method requires a minimum sample size of 30 sites to estimate an individual’s home range (Kenward, 1992; Seaman et al., 1999), we only selected data from individuals which had been tracked at least three months of the dry season and three months of the wet season during one…”
MethodMeasures of Space use and Association of Two Unrelated Male Red Wolves in a Shared Area
Karlin, M., & Chadwick, J. (2011) · doi:10.3106/041.036.0305 · Cited by 3
“The unit of measurement for each variable was set at 10 days because this window of time identified short-term spatial and temporal variation, but still maintained the >30 observations required for accurate fixed kernel home range estimates (Seaman et al. 1999).”
BackgroundHome range size of kakapo (Strigops habroptilus) on Codfish Island
Farrimond, M., Clout, M. N., & Elliott, G. P. (2006) · Notornis · doi:10.63172/914209noopit · Cited by 3
Al-Razi, H., Maria, M., Rabbi, R. A., Shimu, M., Rahman, S., Sultana, R., Akbar, A., Hasan, M., Kabir, J., Chowdhury, M. R. K., et al. (2026) · Global Ecology and Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.gecco.2026.e04072 · Cited by 2
Spatial Ecology of North American Pitvipers (Viperidae: Crotalinae): A Review and Meta-Analysis
Maag, D. W., Hanscom, R. J., Fischer, C. G., Marcantonio, V. P., McAndrews, E. C., Kabat, K. L., Hill, J. L., & Clark, R. W. (2025) · Herpetological Monographs · doi:10.1655/0733-1347-39.1.3 · Cited by 2
Wang, X.-X., Fang, L., Zhang, K., Chen, T., & Liu, W. (2025) · Marine Pollution Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2025.118817 · Cited by 2
Decoding Owl Calls: Refining Occupancy Inference From Passive Acoustic Monitoring
Rugg, N. M., Appel, C., Jenkins, J. M. A., McCafferty, C., Levi, T., & Lesmeister, D. B. (2025) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.72255 · Cited by 2
Ranging patterns and mortality of an at-risk marine mammal resident in a highly urbanized estuary
Newman, M., Bossley, M. I., Baring, R. J., Möller, L. M., Steiner, A., & Parra, G. J. (2025) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2025.123218 · Cited by 3
“…that numerical comparisons of ranging patterns in animals should focus on the core part of the range due to a lack of ability to accurately estimate ranges at the periphery of the data or study area (Seaman et al., 1999), and the suggested greater ecological importance of core areas of use.”
Breeding Season Survival and Habitat Use of Scaled Quail in Southeastern New Mexico
Kauffman, K. L., Londe, D. W., Davis, C. A., Fuhlendorf, S., Goodman, L. E., Hagen, C. A., & Elmore, R. D. (2025) · Rangeland Ecology & Management · doi:10.1016/j.rama.2025.02.001 · Cited by 2
“We only included quail with at least 20 telemetry locations during the breeding season (April 15–August 31) in the analysis ( n = 75) to ensure an adequate sample size for home range estimation ( Seaman et al., 1999 ).”
Powell, R. A., Facka, A., Clifford, D. L., Smith, K. P., Matthews, S. M., Murphy, E., Yaeger, J., Figura, P. J., & Callas, R. L. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0320594 · Cited by 2
Jackson, J. R., Jacobs, G. R., Latzka, A., Landsman, T., Young, B. P., & McCune, A. R. (2024) · Environmental Biology of Fishes · doi:10.1007/s10641-024-01585-4 · Cited by 2
Bakaloudis, D., Thoma, C. T., Makridou, K. N., Kotsonas, E. G., Arsenos, G., Theodoridis, A., & Kontsiotis, V. J. (2024) · Land · doi:10.3390/land13081165 · Cited by 2
Oyewole, T. A., Sarker, N., Dhaliwal, G. S., Biggane, E., & Monono, E. (2024) · Journal of the American Oil Chemists Society · doi:10.1002/aocs.12866 · Cited by 2
Tsuyuki, A., & Umino, T. (2024) · Fisheries Science · doi:10.1007/s12562-024-01748-3 · Cited by 2
“The kernel utilization distribution (KUD) areas of home range were determined using the positions of three tagged fish (#1, #5, and #6), which yielded adequate representative samples for KUD estimation (Seaman et al. 1999).”
Teoh, Z. Y., Then, A. Y., Ng, J. E., Kuit, S. H., Hisne, F. I. J., & Ponnampalam, L. S. (2023) · Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems · doi:10.1002/aqc.4002 · Cited by 3
Southern Red-backed Vole (Myodes gapperi) habitat associations in northern New England forests
Tisell, H. B., Degrassi, A., Stephens, R., & Rowe, R. J. (2023) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.1093/jmammal/gyad068 · Cited by 2
“…kernel density model (Van Winkle 1975; Worton 1989) using a fixed kernel smoothing bandwidth selected by reference that accommodates our relatively small number of locations and decreases home range estimation bias (Worton 1989; Seaman et al. 1999; Kie 2013) as described in Tisell et al. (2019).”
MethodLu, Y., Xu, X.-R., Chen, B.-Y., & Yang, G. (2023) · Mammalian Biology · doi:10.1007/s42991-023-00350-x · Cited by 2
Palarski, J., Kubečka, B. W., Rollins, D., Ruzicka, R. E., & Mathewson, H. (2023) · Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.1002/jwmg.22367 · Cited by 2
Satellite tracking resident songbirds in tropical forests
Reeve, A. H., Willemoes, M., Paul, L., Nagombi, E., Bodawatta, K. H., Ortvad, T., Maiah, G., & Jønsson, K. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0278641 · Cited by 2
Fülöp, A., Lukács, D., & Barta, Z. (2022) · Ornis Hungarica · doi:10.2478/orhu-2022-0024 · Cited by 2
D’Cruz, A., Salgado-Kent, C., Waples, K., Brown, A. M., Marley, S., Thiele, D., & Raudino, H. (2022) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2021.758435 · Cited by 2
“The MCP is widely recognized and commonly used in the estimation of ranging patterns due to its validity for comparison to previous studies and simple calculation methods (Seaman et al., 1999; Flores and Bazzalo, 2004).”
BackgroundMovement ecology and habitat use differences in Black Scoters wintering along the Atlantic coast
Plumpton, H. M., Gilliland, S., & Ross, B. (2020) · Avian Conservation and Ecology · doi:10.5751/ace-01654-150206 · Cited by 2
“…and quantity of habitats and resources during the nonbreeding season may be important limiting factors for waterfowl (Lack 1966, Fretwell 1972, Sedinger and Alisauskas 2014, Alisauskas and Devink 2015), and can have detrimental effects on population dynamics (Alisauskas and Ankney 1992, Scott…”
BackgroundA survey and a new selection criterion for statistical home range estimation
Baíllo, A., & Chacón, J. E. (2018) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1804.05129 · Cited by 2
Wolf-Moose Spatial Dynamics in Alberta’s Athabasca Oil Sands Region
Neilson, E. (2017) · ERA: Education and Research Archive (University of Alberta) · doi:10.7939/r3cn6zc9z · Cited by 2
Spatial Ecology of Invasive Black Rats (Rattus rattus) On San Clemente Island, California
Higgins, T. W., Bridges, A., & Sanchez, J. N. (2015) · doi:10.1894/swnat-d-14-00020.1 · Cited by 2
“Fixed-kernel home ranges account for differential area use within a home range, but require a larger number of locations to estimate areas of core use (Seaman et al., 1999).”
BackgroundRamos-Lara, N., & Koprowski, J. (2015) · doi:10.1111/eth.12328 · Cited by 2
“…used the home range analysis extension (Rodgers & Carr 1998) for ArcView 3.2a (ESRI, Inc., Redlands, CA, USA) to estimate home-range sizes per individual using 95% and 50% core fixed kernels (FK) with smoothing parameters chosen via least squares cross-validation (Seaman et al. 1999; Powell 2000).”
MethodA Data-Based Conservation Planning Tool for Florida Panthers
Mullinax, J. M., Thatcher, C. A., van Manen, F. T., & Clark, J. D. (2012) · Environmental Modeling & Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10666-012-9336-0 · Cited by 1
“The frequency of radiolocation data collection per week varied over the period studied, so we standardized the data to include no more than three locations per week for each animal and excluded panthers with <50 locations because of possible bias in home range estimation when using the fixed-kernel method [39, 40].”
MethodStabach, J. A., Dabek, L., Jensen, R., Porolak, G., & Wang, Y.-Q. (2011) · doi:10.1201/b11453-12 · Cited by 2
季節, 時刻および植生が大阪のニホンジカ (Cervus nippon) の行動圏に及ぼす影響
石塚, 譲., 川井, 裕., 大谷, 新., 石井, 亘., 山本, 隆., 八丈, 幸., 片山, 敦., & 松下, 美. (2007) · doi:10.11238/mammalianscience.47.1 · Cited by 2
Chollett, I., O'Farrell, S., Perruso, L., & McPherson, M. (2026) · Ocean & Coastal Management · doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2025.107965 · Cited by 1
Daily and monthly movement patterns shape bobcat home range size in two different landscapes
Audia, E., Buckman, K. M., Gorman, N., Weber, A. M., Pease, B. S., Nielsen, C. K., & Bastille-Rousseau, G. (2025) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10980-025-02280-0 · Cited by 1
“We did not calculate a monthly home range with < 30 locations (Seaman et al. 1999), < 15 days of data, and excluded individuals from stability calculations with < 5 monthly home ranges.”
Is wild turkey habitat selection spatially consistent? A three‐decade meta‐analysis in Mississippi
Ogawa, R., Butler, A. B., Wang, G.-M., Rush, S. A., Miller, D. A., Godwin, K. D., McConnell, M. D., Marable, M. K., Priest, S. R., Holder, B. D., et al. (2025) · Wildlife Society bulletin · doi:10.1002/wsb.70000 · Cited by 1
Eye, D. M., Skurikhina, A., Spruyt, J. A., Atkins, M. C., Bishop, C. A., & Larsen, K. W. (2025) · Journal of Herpetology · doi:10.1670/22-064 · Cited by 1
Adaptive behavioural strategies to seasonal challenges by a semi-urban feral ungulatePreprint
Bhattacharjee, D., Flay, K., Mumby, H., & McElligott, A. (2025) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2025.03.12.642745 · Cited by 1
“A minimum sample size of 30 is recommended for the LSCV method (Seaman et al., 1999), whereas the HREF method can be applied based on at least a sample size of 10 (Webb et al., 2011).”
Polar bears in western Hudson Bay show limited on-ice site fidelity
Jodouin, C., Derocher, A. E., Lunn, N. J., McGeachy, D., & Pilfold, N. W. (2025) · Polar Biology · doi:10.1007/s00300-025-03366-w · Cited by 1
“We further standardized the number of telemetry fixes by randomly selecting 30 locations per seasonal range, which is the minimum recommended for home range estimation (Seaman et al. 1999).”
Coady, M., Obbard, M., & Burrows, F. G. (2024) · Ursus · doi:10.2192/ursus-d-23-00017r1 · Cited by 1
Flammulated Owls Exhibit Diel Variation in Space Use
McGinn, K. A., Eisaguirre, J., & Linkhart, B. D. (2024) · The Journal of raptor research · doi:10.3356/jrr2388 · Cited by 1
“For each tracking period (early-night and late-night during the incubation and nestling stages) of each bird, we used a subset of the final locations after filtering (between 48 – 94 locations per tracking period) to estimate use areas (Seaman et al. 1999).”
Bachran, K., Ransom, T. S., & Liebgold, E. B. (2024) · Northeastern Naturalist · doi:10.1656/045.031.s1222 · Cited by 1
Gagorik, C. N., Theimer, T., Crooks, K. R., & Boser, C. (2024) · The Southwestern naturalist · doi:10.1894/0038-4909-68.1.35 · Cited by 1
Gorecki, V., Rhodes, M., & Parsons, S. (2024) · Urban Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s11252-024-01543-z · Cited by 1
“We used a one-way PERMANOVA to test for the effect of including individuals with fewer than 30 fixes on home range (95% KDE) and core use area (50% KDE) between seasons because a minimum sample size of 30 is recommended for kernel density estimation (Seaman et al. 1999).”
Methods for Studying Songbird Territories
Matantseva, M. (2023) · Biology Bulletin · doi:10.1134/s1062359024700651 · Cited by 1
“It is known that to assess a site using kernel analysis methods, it is recommended to obtain at least 30 locations to form an isopleth (Seaman et al., 1999).”
Gao, M.-Q., Erdenechimeg, B., Purev-Ochir, G., Gungaa, A., & Guo, Y.-M. (2023) · Journal of Ornithology · doi:10.1007/s10336-023-02053-z · Cited by 1
“For each stage, individuals with data less than three days or 30 locations were excluded from analyses to obtain a clearer signal from the data (Seaman et al. 1999).”
MethodLatt, T., Chaiyarat, R., Choowaew, S., Thongtip, N., & Stewart, T. (2022) · Diversity · doi:10.3390/d14121076 · Cited by 1
Atickem, A., Klapproth, M., Fischer, M. T., Zinner, D. P., & Loe, L. E. (2022) · Mammalian Biology · doi:10.1007/s42991-021-00216-0 · Cited by 1
“, the area with the 50% isopleth level (Bingham et al. 1997; Seaman et al. 1999).”
BackgroundKertson, B. N., & Keren, I. (2021) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.1093/jmammal/gyab145 · Cited by 1
Habitat selection in the lesser cuckoo, an avian brood parasite breeding on Jeju Island, Korea
Yun, S., Lee, J.-W., & Yoo, J.-C. (2020) · Journal of Ecology and Environment · doi:10.1186/s41610-020-00159-6 · Cited by 1
“Home ranges were estimated for individuals which were monitored for at least 4 days and had more than 30 recorded locations (Seaman et al. 1999).”
Atickem, A., Klapproth, M., Fischer, M., Zinner, D., & Loe, L. (2020) · Mammalian Biology · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-21274/v1 · Cited by 1
“areas where individuals are found with greater probability within the home ranges, and was determined at the 50% isopleth level [26, 27].”
BackgroundFujikawa, A., & Tubelis, D. (2019) · Journal of Natural History · doi:10.1080/00222933.2019.1704461 · Cited by 1
“Following recommendations by Seaman et al. (1999) and Laver and Kelly (2008), Kernel 95% and Kernel 50% were calculated, referring respectively to the whole home range and the nuclear areas (portions of home ranges more intensively used by the individuals).”
MethodRegression based circular error probable: An application to ballistic systems
Zimmer, Z., & Turner, C. (2017) · doi:10.1080/23737484.2017.1406317 · Cited by 1
Habitat use by Abert's squirrels (Sciurus aberti) in managed forests
Yarborough, R., Gist, J. A., Loberger, C. D., & Rosenstock, S. (2015) · doi:10.1894/jkf-49.1 · Cited by 1
“…Home Range Tool adapted from ArcView 3.3 Home Range Extension (Rogers and Carr, 1998) with a least-squares cross-validation smoothing parameter (Worton, 1995; Seaman and Powell, 1996; Seaman et al., 1999) for six squirrels that were tracked in 2005, 2006, and 2007 at the Mountainaire study site.”
MethodInfluentialBao, W., Zhou, X.-W., Zhang, S.-L., & Shi, K. (2014) · Advanced materials research · doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.955-959.2600 · Cited by 1
PRESENT STATUS AND FUTURE PROSPECTS OF AUTOMATED PROJECT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS' MEASUREMENT
Navon, R. (2006) · doi:10.22260/isarc2006/0077 · Cited by 1
“The problem with it, on the other hand, is that the calculated area includes the entire area encompassing all the measured locations [9], which means that even areas where work was not performed, are included.”
BackgroundHome range and movement patterns of the Redlip Parrotfish (Scarus rubroviolaceus) in Hawaii
Howard, K., Claisse, J., Clark, T., Boyle, K. S., & Parrish, J. (2013) · Marine Biology · doi:10.1007/s00227-013-2211-y
“This is consistent with the recommendation of[50 location points per home range by Seaman et al. (1999). Twenty-one (13 TP and 8 IP) individuals were consistently tracked and had met the minimum sample size determined in the study.”
ResultSafety or satiety? Spatiotemporal behaviour of a threatened herbivore
Mori, E., Lovari, S., Cozzi, F., Gabbrielli, C., Giari, C., Torniai, L., Romeo, G., Ferretti, F., & Fattorini, N. (2020) · Mammalian Biology · doi:10.1007/s42991-020-00013-1
The influence of reproductive status on home range size and spatial dynamics of female Amur tigers
Klevtcova, A. V., Miquelle, D., Seryodkin, I., Bragina, E. V., Soutyrina, S. V., & Goodrich, J. (2021) · Mammal Research · doi:10.1007/s13364-020-00547-2
Movement Patterns and Home Range Size of Cape Cobras (Naja nivea) in the Kalahari, South Africa
Scholtz, K. J., Alexander, G. J., Beck, T., Maritz, R., Briner, J., & Maritz, B. (2026) · Journal of Herpetology · doi:10.1670/3119568
Preiszner, B., Szinai, P., & Kovács, G. (2026) · Movement Ecology · doi:10.1186/s40462-026-00682-6
“This conservative threshold accounts for temporal autocorrelation in GPS data and ensures stable utilization distribution estimates [27].”
Effects of density and kinship on the spatial organization of an asocial ground squirrel
Aliperti, J. R., Wells, C., & Vuren, D. V. (2026) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.1093/jmammal/gyag057
Identifying Shark and Ray Bycatch Hotspots in Sabah, Malaysia
Ho, K., Manjaji-Matsumoto, B. M., Khalid, L., Phu, J. L., Chang, B. A., & Pilcher, N. (2026) · Ecologies · doi:10.3390/ecologies7030065
“…on ETP species, with specific hotspot maps developed for Carcharhinus tjutjot and Rhizoprionodon acutus , as well as for the genus Sphyrna (Section 3.3.1), as the number of capture events for these species or genera exceeded 30 (deemed the minimum required for a robust kernel density analysis [31].”
InfluentialHough, K., Sclafani, M., & Burke, R. (2026) · BMC Zoology · doi:10.1186/s40850-026-00273-3
“Increasing the number of fixes used to estimate home range can increase home range accuracy [46, 47, 86–88].”
Sørås, R., & Sonerud, G. (2026) · Zeitschrift f\ ur Jagdwissenschaft · doi:10.1007/s10344-026-02097-5
“Sample size was > 50 for each owl, and therefore considered sufficient to estimate kernel home ranges (Seaman et al. 1999).”
Williams-Kelly, K. S., Anderson, B., Ross, R., Rayner, K., Cowen, S., & Robert, K. A. (2026) · Ecological Solutions and Evidence · doi:10.1002/2688-8319.70240
Guerra, D. A., Esque, T. C., Davis, D. R., & Veech, J. A. (2025) · Herpetologica · doi:10.1655/herpetologica-d-24-00045
Sovadinová, S., Hertl, I., Körber, A., Peške, L., Obuch, J., & Kouba, M. (2025) · Raptor Journal · doi:10.2478/srj-2025-0003
Jing, W., Yan, H., Ma, X.-J., & Xu, F. (2025) · Acta Herpetologica · doi:10.36253/a_h-16715
Home Range Analysis of the Black-Wood Pigeon (Columba janthina) Inhabiting Ulleung Island1a
Lim, E.-H., Kim, D., & Bae, Y. (2025) · Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology · doi:10.13047/kjee.2025.39.1.46
Analysis of the Home Range of Black-tailed Gulls (Larus crassirostris) Inhabiting the East Sea1a
Lim, E.-H., Kim, D., & Bae, Y. (2025) · Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology · doi:10.13047/kjee.2025.39.1.64
Kissell, R., Tercek, M. T., Thoma, D., & Legg, K. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0317146
Hines, C., Duval, L., Watts, B. D., Smith, F., Hulslander, B., Jardine, R. J., & Whitear, A. K. (2025) · Northeastern Naturalist · doi:10.1656/045.031.0410
Lombardi, V., de Meireles, R. C., & Lopes, L. E. (2025) · Ornithology Research · doi:10.1007/s43388-024-00222-z
“Despite studies commonly reporting the use of the 95% isopleth with Kernel to infer territory size (Barg et al. 2005; Laver and Kelly 2008), there is often limited support for adopting such an isopleth (Seaman et al. 1999; Börger et al. 2006).”
Gidron, O., Shochat, E., Gur, E., & Ovadia, O. (2025) · Global Ecology and Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.gecco.2025.e03449
Wilson, C., Gentle, M., & Fancourt, B. (2024) · Pacific Conservation Biology · doi:10.1071/pc24031
Han, J.-R., Kim, T. H., Choi, H.-W., & Han, H.-G. (2024) · Journal of Coastal Research · doi:10.2112/jcr-si116-051.1
“KDE is used to estimate spatial density distribution based on location data (Seaman, et al ., 1999).”
MethodPost-release ecology of rehabilitated Hoffmann’s two-toed sloths in Panamá
Morton, C., Nielsen, C., Carver, A., Correa, N., & Yanguez, Y. S. (2023) · Tropical Zoology · doi:10.4081/tz.2023.118
Socias-Martínez, L., Peckre, L. R., & Noonan, M. (2022) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2022.03.15.484432
Modelling Place Visit Probability Sequences during Trajectory Data Gaps Based on Movement History
Ren, C., Tang, L.-L., Long, J., Kan, Z.-H., & Yang, X. (2021) · ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf. · doi:10.3390/ijgi10070456
Designing Timber Harvesting to Enhance New Zealand Falcon Populations
Horikoshi, C., Battley, P., & Minot, E. (2021) · doi:10.1002/jwmg.22013
A simple graph theoretic method provides accurate range area estimates
Alroy, J. (2020) · doi:10.22541/au.160166537.70758975
“5B) is still a very low figure because it has long been recommended that at least 50 data points should be used to fix home ranges (Seaman et al. 1999).”
Connelly, J., Knick, S., Braun, C., Baker, W. L., Beever, E., Christiansen, T., Doherty, K., Garton, E. O., Hanser, S., Johnson, D. H., et al. (2019) · University of California Press eBooks · doi:10.1525/9780520948686-028
Winter activity patterns of the North American badger (Taxidea taxus) at its northwestern periphery
Symes, S., Klafki, R., Packham, R., & Larsen, K. (2019) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.1093/jmammal/gyz171
Metadata
- Authors
- Seaman, D. E., Millspaugh, J. J., Kernohan, B. J., Brundige, G. C., Raedeke, K. J., & Gitzen, R. A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Wildlife Management
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1999-04
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 739
- ISSN
- 0022-541X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2094014445
- Cited by
- 1,390
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 65 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 74 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 66 · 2016: 60 · 2015: 74 · 2014: 81 · 2013: 98 · 2012: 80
- FWCI
- 13.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Wildlife Management (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
- Keywords
- sample size, home range estimation, animal movement, home range size, GPS tracking, spatial autocorrelation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review