Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 268

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Movement Patterns and Egg Distribution in Cabbage Butterflies

Jones, R. E.·1977·The Journal of Animal Ecology

Abstract

(1) The movement patterns of Canadian (Vancouver) and Australian (Canberra) cabbage butterfly females searching for hosts are described, and the descriptions incorporated in stochastic simulation models. Some of the parameters of the model (those dealing with probabilities of landing and laying) depend on host plant quality and particularly on the age and species of host plant. Other parameters, and particularly the degree of attraction toward hosts, depend on the current fecundity of the butterfly. (2) The models correctly predict observed behaviour patterns, characteristics of Pieris rapae egg distributions described in the literature, and egg distributions produced in field trials during the study. (3) Vancouver females are quite different from Canberra females. The behavioural differences result in less dispersal, a more aggregated distribution of eggs and more efficient search at low plant densities. (4) The two are nonetheless affected in qualitatively similar ways by changes in resource distribution. At any given host density, fewer eggs are laid on more contagiously distributed hosts and egg distributions are more aggregated at low host densities than at high. The effect of contagious host distribution means that more eggs are laid on isolated plants than on plants in small groups, and more on plants in small groups than on plants in large groups. (5) Thus butterfly density tends to vary inversely with host density, despite aggregative behaviour identical to that which, in predator-prey systems, leads to a direct correlation between the densities of searcher and resource. The difference occurs because the butterfly can find the same host repeatedly, and indicates that such a direct correlation (with its stabilizing properties) is much more difficult for a truly non-discriminating parasite to achieve than it is for a predator. (P. rapae can be regarded as a non-discriminating parasite whose prey happens to be a plant.)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3956

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 268

Metadata

Authors
Jones, R. E.
Venue
The Journal of Animal Ecology
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1977-02
Volume
46
Issue
1
Pages
195
ISSN
0021-8790 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1989770291
Cited by
268
References
12
FWCI
12.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.