The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Movement Patterns and Egg Distribution in Cabbage Butterflies
Abstract
(1) The movement patterns of Canadian (Vancouver) and Australian (Canberra) cabbage butterfly females searching for hosts are described, and the descriptions incorporated in stochastic simulation models. Some of the parameters of the model (those dealing with probabilities of landing and laying) depend on host plant quality and particularly on the age and species of host plant. Other parameters, and particularly the degree of attraction toward hosts, depend on the current fecundity of the butterfly. (2) The models correctly predict observed behaviour patterns, characteristics of Pieris rapae egg distributions described in the literature, and egg distributions produced in field trials during the study. (3) Vancouver females are quite different from Canberra females. The behavioural differences result in less dispersal, a more aggregated distribution of eggs and more efficient search at low plant densities. (4) The two are nonetheless affected in qualitatively similar ways by changes in resource distribution. At any given host density, fewer eggs are laid on more contagiously distributed hosts and egg distributions are more aggregated at low host densities than at high. The effect of contagious host distribution means that more eggs are laid on isolated plants than on plants in small groups, and more on plants in small groups than on plants in large groups. (5) Thus butterfly density tends to vary inversely with host density, despite aggregative behaviour identical to that which, in predator-prey systems, leads to a direct correlation between the densities of searcher and resource. The difference occurs because the butterfly can find the same host repeatedly, and indicates that such a direct correlation (with its stabilizing properties) is much more difficult for a truly non-discriminating parasite to achieve than it is for a predator. (P. rapae can be regarded as a non-discriminating parasite whose prey happens to be a plant.)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Predation and Population Stability
Murdoch, W. W., & Oaten, A. (1975) · Advances in Ecological Research · doi:10.1016/s0065-2504(08)60288-3 · Cited by 1,551
The Functional Response of Invertebrate Predators to Prey Density
Holling, C. S. (1966) · Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada · doi:10.4039/entm9848fv · Cited by 1,349
Stability in Insect Host-Parasite Models
Hassell, M. P., & May, R. M. (1973) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/3133 · Cited by 885
Watson, G. S., & Batschelet, E. (1966) · Biometrika · doi:10.2307/2334091 · Cited by 786
Dispersal: Population Consequences and Evolution
Gadgil, M. (1971) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1934583 · Cited by 418
Dixon, A. F. G. (1959) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/2082 · Cited by 373
The Food Searching Behaviour of Two European Thrushes. Ii: the Adaptiveness of the Search Patterns
Smith, J. N. M. (1974) · Behaviour · doi:10.1163/156853974x00390 · Cited by 335
Jr., W. J. C. (1975) · The Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.2307/2402172 · Cited by 223
The behaviour of individual coccinellid larvae on plants
Banks, C. J. (1957) · The British Journal of Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/s0950-5601(57)80039-2 · Cited by 217
The Food Searching Behaviour of Two European Thrushes
Smith, J. N. M. (1974) · Behaviour · doi:10.1163/156853974x00363 · Cited by 168
Studies on searching capacity of the larvae of three predators of the citrus red mite
Fleschner, C. A. (1950) · Hilgardia · doi:10.3733/hilg.v20n13p233 · Cited by 153
The Role of Sexual Behavior in Density-Related Dispersal of Pierid Butterflies
Shapiro, A. M. (1970) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282670 · Cited by 129
Cited by
Specialization: Species Property or Local Phenomenon?
Fox, L. R., & Morrow, P. A. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.211.4485.887 · Cited by 850
Analyzing insect movement as a correlated random walk
Kareiva, P. M., & Shigesada, N. (1983) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00379695 · Cited by 681
Adaptive Patterns of Host-Plant Selection by Phytophagous Insects
Mayhew, P. J. (1997) · Oikos · doi:10.2307/3546884 · Cited by 507
L�vy walk patterns in the foraging movements of spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi)
Ayala-Orozco, B., Cocho, G., Larralde, H., Ramos-Fern�ndez, G., Mateos, J. L., & Miramontes, O. (2004) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/s00265-003-0700-6 · Cited by 502
The Ecological and Genetic Consequences of Density-Dependent Regulation in Plants
Antonovics, J., & Levin, D. A. (1980) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.11.110180.002211 · Cited by 492
Metadata
- Authors
- Jones, R. E.
- Venue
- The Journal of Animal Ecology
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1977-02
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 195
- ISSN
- 0021-8790 (ISSN-L)
- DOI
- 10.2307/3956
- OpenAlex
- W1989770291
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 12.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.