The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Richness, Abundance and Biomass of the Arthropod Communities on Trees
Abstract
(1) The invertebrate fauna of six tree species in both Britain and South Africa was sampled using pyrethrum knockdown. Two of the tree species in Britain and three in South Africa were introduced; the rest were native. (2) Average faunal diversities were similar in South Africa and in Britain. (3) The South African arthropod community consisted of fewer, heavier individuals than the British ones and tended to have a more uniform, larger biomass overall. (4) Faunal diversity was similar for native and introduced trees for all guilds except the phytophages, which showed a lower diversity on introduced trees. (5) On every native tree, the most abundant species was an hemipteran; on four of the five introduced trees other orders provided the most abundant species. (6) Total species richness was correlated with tree abundance for both native and introduced trees in Britain. (7) Arthropod abundance increased with species richness-as communities became richer in species, they became more tightly packed. (8) The biomass and numbers of individual arthropods, classified by guild, was not clearly related to structural and other features of the individual trees sampled. (9) There was a positive correlation between the biomass of chewing phytophages and a measure of defoliation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Simple mathematical models with very complicated dynamics
May, R. M. (1976) · Nature · doi:10.1038/261459a0 · Cited by 7,001
The statistics and biology of the species-area relationship
Connor, E. F., & McCoy, E. D. (1979) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/283438 · Cited by 2,313
Cited by
Testing the enemy release hypothesis: a review and meta-analysis
Liu, H., & Stiling, P. (2006) · Biological Invasions · doi:10.1007/s10530-005-5845-y · Cited by 623
Insect diversity: facts, fiction and speculation*
STORK, N. E. (1988) · Biological Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.1988.tb00474.x · Cited by 512
How many species of arthropods? Erwin's estimate revised
ØDEGAARD, F. (2000) · Biological Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1006/bijl.2000.0468 · Cited by 409
May, R. M. (1990) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1990.0200 · Cited by 395
The Guild Composition of Arthropod Communities in Trees
Moran, V. C., & Southwood, T. R. E. (1982) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/4325 · Cited by 379
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Southwood, T. R. E., Moran, V. C., & Kennedy, C. E. J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Animal Ecology
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1982-06
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 635
- ISSN
- 0021-8790 (ISSN-L)
- DOI
- 10.2307/3988
- OpenAlex
- W2249384781
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Richness, Abundance and Biomass of the Arthropod Communities on Trees. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3988
- The paper
- Southwood, T. R. E., Moran, V. C., & Kennedy, C. E. J. (1982). The Richness, Abundance and Biomass of the Arthropod Communities on Trees. The Journal of Animal Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2307/3988
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.