The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Effect of Type of Written Exercise on L2 Vocabulary Retention
Abstract
The present study used a within-subjects design to examine the effect of the type of written exercise on L2 vocabulary retention. Using input for the meaning and usage of the new words from a specially prepared minidictionary, university intensive English program students (n = 154) practiced target vocabulary in three types of written exercises conditions: one fill-in-the-blank exercise, three fill-in-the-blank exercises, and one original-sentence-writing exercise. An unannounced posttest using a modified version of the vocabulary knowledge scale tested the meaning of the word (L1 translation or L2 synonym) and usage of the word in a student-written sentence. A repeated measures ANOVA revealed that mean scores for the three exercise types were significantly different from each other, with words practiced under the three fill-in-the-blank exercises condition retained much better than those practiced under either of the other two exercise conditions. The findings suggest the important feature of a given L2 vocabulary exercise is not depth of word processing but number of word retrievals required. This result has implications for language teachers, curriculum designers, and, in particular, materials writers of traditional workbooks and CALL materials.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous studies have often found results deviating from involvement load predictions, and there is a need to examine task involvement levels applicable to Korean students.
“관여 부담 가설의 이론적 측면에서 논의하는 과업의 수준이 실제에 있어서는 예측에서 벗어나는 사례들이 많았고(e.g., Choi, 2015;Folse, 2006;Keating, 2008;Kim, 2015;Marmol & Sanchez-Lafuente, 2013;Park, 2011;Soleimani & Rahmanian, 2014;Yang et al., 2017;Zou, 2017)”
From Effects of Task-Induced Involvement Load and Working Memory on Korean High School Students’ Second Language Vocabulary Learning (2021) · cites this paper as Folse, 2006
Citations
Cites
Learning Vocabulary in Another Language
Nation, I. S. P. (2001) · Cambridge University Press · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139524759 · Cited by 6,608
The Role of Consciousness in Second Language Learning1
SCHMIDT, R. W. (1990) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/11.2.129 · Cited by 5,435 · cited 3×
“Two overlapping, important factors in exercise design are attention and noticing, both of which have been extensively debated in L2 acquisition studies (Schmidt, 1990; Truscott, 1998). The design of a certain type of exercise might serve to make a particular L2 word more salient by drawing attention to the word, poten…”
BackgroundIncidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: The construct of task-induced involvement
Laufer, B. (2001) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/22.1.1 · Cited by 1,334 · cited 1×
“Laufer and Hulstijn (2001), however, point out two problems with this model.”
BackgroundSome empirical evidence for the involvement load hypothesis in vocabulary acquisition
Hulstijn, J. H., & Laufer, B. (2001) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/0023-8333.00164 · Cited by 819 · cited 2×
“Hulstijn and Laufer (2001) would say that fill-in-the-blank exercises induce less involvement than writing original sentences as measured table 4 analysis of Variance for effect of exercise type on retention (lenient Scoring) Contrast df Type III SS Mean Square F Value Effect Size Conditions 1 and…”
BackgroundAt what rate do learners learn and retain new vocabulary from reading a graded reader?
Waring, R., & Takaki, M. (2003) · Reading in a Foreign Language · doi:10.64152/10125/66776 · Cited by 547 · cited 1×
“Future research could use multiple 290 TESOL QUARTERLY instruments to ascertain vocabulary learning over time (e.g., short-term vs. long-term retention), as done by Waring and Takaki (2003).”
MethodMaintenance of Foreign Language Vocabulary and the Spacing Effect
Bahrick, H. P., Bahrick, L. E., Bahrick, A. S., & Bahrick, P. E. (1993) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00571.x · Cited by 334
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Task effectiveness and word learning in a second language: the involvement load hypothesis on trial
Keating, G. D. (2008) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168808089922 · Cited by 223
Eckerth, J., & Tavakoli, P. (2012) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168811431377 · Cited by 149
Vocabulary Learning in Virtual Environments: Learner Autonomy and Collaboration
Tseng, W.-T., Liou, H.-J., & Chu, H.-C. (2020) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2019.102190 · Cited by 101
Lexical Input Processing and Vocabulary Learning
Barcroft, J. (2015) · Language Learning & Language Teaching · doi:10.1075/lllt.43 · Cited by 95
van den Broek, G. S. E., Takashima, A., Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2018) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12285 · Cited by 67
“Both of these processes—context inferences and memory retrieval—are potentially beneficial for the long-term retention of words (e.g., Folse, 2006; Hulstijn, 1992; Nation, 2001).”
BackgroundA Review on Studies into Incidental Vocabulary Acquisition through Different Input
Tang, Z. (2020) · English Language Teaching · doi:10.5539/elt.v13n6p89 · Cited by 8
Lee, O.-H., & Lee, S.-K. (2021) · Lanaguage Research · doi:10.30961/lr.2021.57.1.143 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Folse, K. S.
- Venue
- TESOL Quarterly
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-06-01
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 273
- ISSN
- 0039-8322
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 6
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review