Cited by 164

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Effect of Type of Written Exercise on L2 Vocabulary Retention

Folse, Keith S.·2006·TESOL Quarterly

Abstract

The present study used a within-subjects design to examine the effect of the type of written exercise on L2 vocabulary retention. Using input for the meaning and usage of the new words from a specially prepared minidictionary, university intensive English program students (n = 154) practiced target vocabulary in three types of written exercises conditions: one fill-in-the-blank exercise, three fill-in-the-blank exercises, and one original-sentence-writing exercise. An unannounced posttest using a modified version of the vocabulary knowledge scale tested the meaning of the word (L1 translation or L2 synonym) and usage of the word in a student-written sentence. A repeated measures ANOVA revealed that mean scores for the three exercise types were significantly different from each other, with words practiced under the three fill-in-the-blank exercises condition retained much better than those practiced under either of the other two exercise conditions. The findings suggest the important feature of a given L2 vocabulary exercise is not depth of word processing but number of word retrievals required. This result has implications for language teachers, curriculum designers, and, in particular, materials writers of traditional workbooks and CALL materials.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/40264523

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous studies have often found results deviating from involvement load predictions, and there is a need to examine task involvement levels applicable to Korean students.

    “관여 부담 가설의 이론적 측면에서 논의하는 과업의 수준이 실제에 있어서는 예측에서 벗어나는 사례들이 많았고(e.g., Choi, 2015;Folse, 2006;Keating, 2008;Kim, 2015;Marmol & Sanchez-Lafuente, 2013;Park, 2011;Soleimani & Rahmanian, 2014;Yang et al., 2017;Zou, 2017)”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Folse, K. S.
Venue
TESOL Quarterly
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-06-01
Volume
40
Issue
2
Pages
273
ISSN
0039-8322
Cited by
164
References
6
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review