Cited by 173Quality and Supply ManagementInnovation and Knowledge ManagementBusiness Strategy and Innovation

Organizational Learning and Purchase-Supply Relations in Japan: Hitachi, Matsushita, and Toyota Compared

Lincoln, James R., Ahmadjian, Christina L., Mason, Eliot·1998·California Management Review

Abstract

This article deals with the role of purchase-supply relations in organizational learning and knowledge-creation in Japan and how such relations are currently undergoing change. Drawing on interviews with managers, it presents case studies of the customer-supplier partnerships of three prominent Japanese manufacturing firms: Hitachi, Matsushita, and Toyota. The Hitachi case illustrates in a somewhat novel way the prevailing paradigm of how long-term, high-trust supply relations in Japan enhance organizational knowledge creation, learning, and innovation. The Toyota and Matsushita cases demonstrate that the dynamics of learning are behind two very different kinds of change in keiretsu supply networks. Toyota's evolving relationship with long-term partner, Denso Corporation, appears to fit the popular view that globalization and technological change are eroding Japanese keiretsu ties. The Matsushita case, by contrast, demonstrates that these same forces of change in other industrial settings may in fact be strengthening keiretsu-style partnerships.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/41165953

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Open and direct communication between companies is the critical success factor during supplier interactions in new product development processes.

    “The degree of involvement of suppliers tends to depend on the nature of projects; however, open and direct communication between companies has been identified as the critical success factor during supplier interactions in new product development processes (Harryson, 1997;Ragatz et al. 1997;Lincoln et al. 1998;Perez and Sanchez, 2002).”

    From Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence (2004) · cites this paper as Lincoln et al. 1998

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lincoln, J. R., Ahmadjian, C. L., & Mason, E.
Venue
California Management Review
Published
1998-04
Volume
40
Issue
3
Pages
241-264
ISSN
  • 0008-1256 (ISSN-L)
  • 2162-8564
OpenAlex
W2323659019
Cited by
173
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
FWCI
18.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
California Management Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Quality and Supply Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategy and Innovation
Keywords
organizational learning, knowledge production, keiretsu, customer-supplier partnerships, trust, Hitachi, Matsushita, Toyota, Denso, globalization, technological change, Japanese manufacturing firms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review