The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Organizing and Leading “Heavyweight” Development Teams
Abstract
Creating a distinctive advantage in the speed, efficiency, and quality of product developments is a major challenge for most firms. Achieving integration across functions lies at the heart of that challenge. While many authors recommend teams as a way to effectively manage development activities, realizing outstanding performance requires much more than simply naming members to a core team and designating a project head. A competitive advantage in product development capability requires fundamental changes in how work gets done; in the skills, capabilities, and tools team members bring to that work; in the support activities required from other groups inside and outside the organization; and in the responsibility and ownership taken by the project leader and core team for creating and executing the concept. This article lays out a framework for organizing and leading heavyweight teams and presents examples of companies that have made heavyweight teams a distinctive advantage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Product development: Past research, present findings and future directions
Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258850 · Cited by 3,777
What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite
Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. (1997) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639702300303 · Cited by 3,526
Chatterjee, D., Grewal, R., & Sambamurthy, V. (2002) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/4132321 · Cited by 945
Collaborative Research Across Disciplinary and Organizational Boundaries
Cummings, J. N., & Kiesler, S. (2005) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/0306312705055535 · Cited by 759
A cross-national comparative study of new product development processes: Japan and the United States
Song, X. M., & Parry, M. E. (1997) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299706100201 · Cited by 709
Hall, J., & Wagner, M. (2012) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.728 · Cited by 227
Framing for Learning: Lessons in Successful Technology Implementation
Edmondson, A. C. (2003) · California Management Review · doi:10.2307/41166164 · Cited by 159
(2003) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Clark, K. B., & Wheelwright, S. C.
- Venue
- California Management Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1992-04
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 9-28
- ISSN
- 0008-1256 (ISSN-L)
- 2162-8564
- OpenAlex
- W2138459499
- Cited by
- 449
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.