Cited by 945Technology Adoption and User BehaviourInformation Technology Governance and StrategyInformation Systems Theories and Implementation

Shaping Up for E-Commerce: Institutional Enablers of the Organizational Assimilation of Web Technologies1

Chatterjee, Debabroto, Grewal, Rajdeep, Sambamurthy, V.·2002·MIS Quarterly

Abstract

The global reach of the Web technological platform, along with the range of services that it supports, makes it a powerful business resource. However, realization of operational and strategic benefits is contingent on effective assimilation of this type III IS innovation. This paper draws upon institutional theory and the conceptual lens of structuring and metastructuring actions to explain the importance of three factors—top management championship, strategic investment rationale, and extent of coordination—in achieving higher levels of Web assimilation within an organization. Survey data are utilized to test a nomological network of relationships among these factors and the extent of organizational assimilation of Web technologies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/4132321

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The migration from initial adoption to the diffusion of technological innovation is complex and involves additional steps of diffusion, routinization and extension of assimilation.

    “The migration from initial adoption to the diffusion of technological innovation is complex and involves additional steps of diffusion, routinization and extension of assimilation”

    From AI-augmented HRM: Antecedents, assimilation and multilevel consequences (2023) · cites this paper as Chatterjee, Grewal & Sambamurthy, 2002

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chatterjee, D., Grewal, R., & Sambamurthy, V.
Affiliations
  • University of Georgia (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • Michigan State University (US)
Venue
MIS Quarterly
Publisher
MIS Quarterly
Published
2002-06-01
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
65-89
ISSN
  • 0276-7783 (ISSN-L)
  • 2162-9730
OpenAlex
W2129332601
Cited by
945
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 65 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 50 · 2013: 47 · 2012: 49
FWCI
72.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • MIS Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • Journal of the Association for Information Systems (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Cisco Systems
  • Florida State University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Technology Governance and Strategy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
Keywords
e-commerce, organizational assimilation, institutional theory, top management support, strategic investment, coordination, information systems innovation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review