The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cross-Cultural Software Production and Use: A Structurational Analysis1
Abstract
This paper focuses on cross-cultural software production and use, which is increasingly common in today’s more globalized world. A theoretical basis for analysis is developed, using concepts drawn from structuration theory. The theory is illustrated using two cross-cultural case studies. It is argued that structurational analysis provides a deeper examination of cross-cultural working and IS than is found in the current literature, which is dominated by Hofstede-type studies. In particular, the theoretical approach can be used to analyze cross-cultural conflict and contradiction, cultural heterogeneity, detailed work patterns, and the dynamic nature of culture. The paper contributes to the growing body of literature that emphasizes the essential role of cross-cultural understanding in contemporary society.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind.
Triandis, H. C., & Hofstede, G. (1993) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393257 · Cited by 17,696
The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations
Orlikowski, W. J. (1992) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.3.3.398 · Cited by 4,957
The Rise of the Network Society
Castells, M. (2009) · doi:10.1002/9781444319514 · Cited by 4,664
Partnering Across Borders: Negotiating Organizational Culture in a German-Japanese Joint Venture
Brannen, M. Y., & Salk, J. E. (2000) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726700534001 · Cited by 421
Cited by
Leonardi, P. M. (2011) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/23043493 · Cited by 1,889
Service innovation in the digital age: Key contributions and future directions
Barrett, M., Davidson, E., Prabhu, J., & Vargo, S. L. (2015) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2015/39:1.03 · Cited by 956
Urquhart, C., Lehmann, H., & Myers, M. D. (2010) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2575.2009.00328.x · Cited by 841
Leonardi, P. M., & Barley, S. R. (2010) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416521003654160 · Cited by 733
Baird, A., & Maruping, L. M. (2021) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2021/15882 · Cited by 512
Rai, A., Maruping, L. M., & Venkatesh, V. (2009) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/20650313 · Cited by 311
Lowry, P. B., Zhang, D., Zhou, L., & Fu, X. (2010) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2575.2009.00334.x · Cited by 206
Boundary object use in cross-cultural software development teams
Barrett, M., & Oborn, E. (2010) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726709355657 · Cited by 194
Udo, G. J., Bagchi, K. K., & Kirs, P. J. (2012) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.04.017 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Walsham, G.
- Venue
- MIS Quarterly
- Publisher
- MIS Quarterly
- Published
- 2002-12-01
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 359-380
- ISSN
- 0276-7783 (ISSN-L)
- 2162-9730
- OpenAlex
- W2134943880
- Cited by
- 556
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 100.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
