The Robustness of Authoritarianism in the Middle East: Exceptionalism in Comparative Perspective
Abstract
Why have the Middle East and North Africa remained so singularly resistant to democratization? While the number of electoral democracies has nearly doubled since 1972, the number in this region has registered an absolute decline.1 Today, only two out of twenty-one countries qualify as electoral democracies, down from three observed in 1972.2 Stagnation is also evident in the guarantee of political rights and civil liberties. While the number of countries designated free by Freedom House has doubled in the Americas and in the Asia-Pacific region, increased tenfold in Africa, and risen exponentially in Central and East Europe over the past thirty years, there has been no overall improvement in the Middle East and North Africa.3 Aggregate scores in 2002 differ little from 1972. Fifteen countries are designated not free, five partly free, and only one free (see Table 1). While a few countries, notably Morocco, Jordan, Bahrain, and Yemen, have registered noteworthy progress toward political liberalization in the past decade, overall the vast majority of countries has failed to catch the wave of democratization that has swept nearly every other part of the world.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Do natural resources fuel authoritarianism? A reappraisal of the resource curse
HABER, S., & MENALDO, V. (2011) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055410000584 · Cited by 1,128 · see citing works
After Egypt: The Limits and Promise of Online Challenges to the Authoritarian Arab State
Lynch, M. (2011) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592711000910 · Cited by 388 · see citing works
Jackson, N. J. (2010) · Contemporary Politics · doi:10.1080/13569771003593920 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
“Thugs-for-Hire”: Subcontracting of State Coercion and State Capacity in China
Ong, L. H. (2018) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592718000981 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
State Security, Information, and Repression: A Comparison of Communist Bulgaria and Ba'thist Iraq
Dimitrov, M. K., & Sassoon, J. (2014) · Journal of Cold War Studies · doi:10.1162/jcws_a_00448 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Arab Uprisings and Armed Forces: Between Openness and Resistance
Lutterbeck, D. (2011) · Ubiquity Press eBooks · doi:10.5334/bbm · Cited by 43 · see citing works
The Long Arm and the Iron Fist: Authoritarian Crackdowns and Transnational Repression
Dukalskis, A., Furstenberg, S., Hellmeier, S., & Scales, R. (2024) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/00220027231188896 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Understanding media empowerment: citizen journalism in Palestine
Horoub, I. (2023) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-023-01526-z · Cited by 14 · see citing works
“The aforementioned lack of trust can be seen more vividly among Middle Eastern nations due to the format of governing systems and limitations on the media in this region (Bakis and Karakoç, 2015; Bellin, 2004; Kazemi and Norton, 2006; Kurd, 2022).”
BackgroundInfluential
- Authors
- Bellin, E.
- Corresponding author
- Bellin, Eva
- Venue
- Comparative Politics
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 2004-01
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 139
- ISSN
- 0010-4159 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2334875510
- Cited by
- 1,020
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 91 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 77 · 2020: 73 · 2019: 112 · 2018: 64 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 54 · 2014: 50 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 44
- FWCI
- 50.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Comparative Politics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Middle East Politics and Society
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
- Keywords
- authoritarianism, democratization, Middle East and North Africa, political exceptionalism, electoral democracy, political liberalization, political rights, civil liberties, Freedom House
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review