The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Hyperspace Effect: Phonetic Targets Are Hyperarticulated
Abstract
A commonly made, but rarely defended, assumption is that phonetic reduction processes apply to hyperarticulated phonetic targets. Results from experiments reported in this paper support this assumption. In various experimental conditions, listeners adjusted the input parameters of a speech synthesizer until the vowels it produced sounded like the vowels found in a set of example words. A preliminary study indicated that the method of adjustment is a feasible tool for studying vowel systems. Interestingly, listeners in the study chose vowels that were systematically different from those measured in productions of the set of example words: high vowels were higher, low vowels were lower, front vowels were farther front, and back vowels were farther back. We hypothesized that this extreme vowel space corresponds to phonetic targets that are hyperarticulated: HYPERSPACE. This hypothesis was tested in the two main experiments. The first experiment controlled for possible effects of instructions and phonetic training on the listeners' choices. In the second experiment, we improved the naturalness and distinctiveness of the synthetic vowels. The results indicate that the extreme vowels chosen by the listeners were consistent with those produced in hyperarticulated speech; moreover, the hyperspace effect is robust across experimental conditions. These results validate the hypothesis that phonetic targets are hyperarticulated, and are consistent with a two-stage model of phonetic implementation: at the first stage distinctive features are mapped to hyperarticulated phonetic targets, and at the second stage these phonetic targets are reduced.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Control Methods Used in a Study of the Vowels
Peterson, G. E., & Barney, H. L. (1952) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1906875 · Cited by 2,837
Kuhl, P. K. (1991) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03212211 · Cited by 1,331
Samuel, A. G. (1982) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03202653 · Cited by 157
Cited by
Cross-language analysis of phonetic units in language addressed to infants
Kuhl, P. K., Andruski, J. E., Chistovich, I. A., Chistovich, L. A., Kozhevnikova, E. V., Ryskina, V. L., Stolyarova, E. I., Sundberg, U., & Lacerda, F. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.277.5326.684 · Cited by 1,041
BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEEN L2 SPEECH PERCEPTION RESEARCH AND PHONOLOGICAL THEORY
Escudero, P., & Boersma, P. (2004) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263104040021 · Cited by 459
The Revised Speech Learning Model (SLM-r)
Flege, J. E., & Bohn, O.-S. (2021) · Second Language Speech Learning · doi:10.1017/9781108886901.002 · Cited by 429
Speaking Clearly for Children With Learning Disabilities: Sentence Perception in Noise
Bradlow, A. R., Kraus, N., & Hayes, E. (2003) · Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2003/007 · Cited by 358
Exemplar models, evolution and language change
Wedel, A. B. (2006) · The Linguistic Review · doi:10.1515/tlr.2006.010 · Cited by 351
Metadata
- Authors
- Johnson, K., Flemming, E., & Wright, R.
- Venue
- Language
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1993-09
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 505
- ISSN
- 0097-8507 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2012113655
- Cited by
- 348
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 2.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Hyperspace Effect: Phonetic Targets Are Hyperarticulated. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/416697
- The paper
- Johnson, K., Flemming, E., & Wright, R. (1993). The Hyperspace Effect: Phonetic Targets Are Hyperarticulated. Language. https://doi.org/10.2307/416697
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.