Cited by 157Phonetics and Phonology ResearchCategorization, perception, and languageNeuroscience and Music Perception

Phonetic prototypes

Open access
Samuel, Arthur G.·1982·Perception & Psychophysics

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/bf03202653

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Native-language phonetic prototypes evoke special responses compared with nonprototypes.

    “Many behavioral (63–69) and brain (70–73) studies indicate that native-language phonetic prototypes evoke special responses when compared with nonprototypes.”

    From A new view of language acquisition (2000) · cites this paper as [67]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. REPP, B. Identification of dichotic fusions. Journal of the Acous- tical Society ofAmerica, 1976,60,456-469.
  2. ROSCH, E. The nature of mental color codes for color categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1975,1,303-322.
  3. SAMUEL, A. The effect of discrimination training on speech per- ception: Noncategorical perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 1977,22,321-330.
  4. SAMUEL, A., & NEWPORT, E. Adaptation of speech by nonspeech: Evidence for complex acoustic cue detectors. Journal ofExperi- mental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1979, 5,563-578.
  5. SAWUSCH, J. R. Peripheral and central processing in speech per- ception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1977, 62, 738-750.
  6. SIMON, H. J., & STUDDERT-KENNEDY, M. Selective anchoring and adaptation of phonetic and nonphonetic continua. Journal ofthe Acoustical Society ofAmerica, 1978,64,1338-1357.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Samuel, A. G.
Corresponding author
Samuel, Arthur G.
Venue
Perception & Psychophysics
Published
1982-07
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
307-314
ISSN
  • 0031-5117 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5962
OpenAlex
W3187739125
Cited by
157
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Perception & Psychophysics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
Keywords
phonetic classification, prototype model, speech perception, phoneme boundaries, voice onset time, selective adaptation, category boundaries
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Adult, Discrimination, Psychological, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Phonetics, Speech Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review