Cited by 198Animal Behavior and ReproductionPrimate Behavior and EcologyWildlife Ecology and Conservation

Helpers’in Fox Society

Macdonald, D. W.·1979·Nature

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/282069a0

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Greater sociality in females may increase viral transmission opportunities.

    “Whilst other studies looking at sex differences and immunity suggest that females typically display stronger immune responses and reduced pathogen load compared to males (Klein 2000), greater sociality in females (Macdonald 1979, 1983) may increase viral transmission opportunities.”

    From Red fox viromes in urban and rural landscapes (2020) · cites this paper as Macdonald 1979

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Macdonald, D. W.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Macdonald, D. W.
Venue
Nature
Published
1979-11
Volume
282
Issue
5734
Pages
69-71
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W1999284490
Cited by
198
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
FWCI
7.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Nature (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Keywords
red fox, helping behavior, social organization, women's subordination, kin selection, cub rearing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review