The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sociomathematical Norms, Argumentation, and Autonomy in Mathematics
Abstract
This paper sets forth a way of interpreting mathematics classrooms that aims to account for how students develop mathematical beliefs and values and, consequently, how they become intellectually autonomous in mathematics. To do so, we advance the notion of sociomathematical norms, that is, normative aspects of mathematical discussions that are specific to students' mathematical activity. The explication of sociomathematical norms extends our previous work on general classroom social norms that sustain inquiry-based discussion and argumentation. Episodes from a second-grade classroom where mathematics instruction generally followed an inquiry tradition are used to clarify the processes by which sociomathematical norms are interactively constituted and to illustrate how these norms regulate mathematical argumentation and influence learning opportunities for both the students and the teacher. In doing so, we both clarify how students develop a mathematical disposition and account for students' development of increasing intellectual autonomy in mathematics. In the process, the teacher's role as a representative of the mathematical community is elaborated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sfard, A. (1991) · Educational Studies in Mathematics · doi:10.1007/bf00302715 · Cited by 1,852
Cited by
Deliberative Discourse Idealized and Realized: Accountable Talk in the Classroom and in Civic Life
Michaels, S., O’Connor, C., & Resnick, L. B. (2008) · Studies in Philosophy and Education · doi:10.1007/s11217-007-9071-1 · Cited by 853
A research framework for creative and imitative reasoning
Lithner, J. (2008) · Educational Studies in Mathematics · doi:10.1007/s10649-007-9104-2 · Cited by 508
Stylianides, A. J. (2007) · Journal for Research in Mathematics Education · doi:10.2307/30034869 · Cited by 342
Argumentation for Learning: Well-Trodden Paths and Unexplored Territories
Asterhan, C. S. C., & Schwarz, B. B. (2016) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2016.1155458 · Cited by 338
Rethinking Characterizations of Beliefs
Furinghetti, F., & Pehkonen, E. (2002) · Beliefs: A Hidden Variable in Mathematics Education? · doi:10.1007/0-306-47958-3_3 · Cited by 283
Metadata
- Authors
- Yackel, E., & Cobb, P.
- Venue
- Journal for Research in Mathematics Education
- Published
- 1996-07
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 458
- ISSN
- 0021-8251 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2046790558
- Cited by
- 1,868
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 53.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sociomathematical Norms, Argumentation, and Autonomy in Mathematics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/749877
- The paper
- Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical Norms, Argumentation, and Autonomy in Mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.2307/749877
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.