Deliberative Discourse Idealized and Realized: Accountable Talk in the Classroom and in Civic Life
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
KCs with rationales imply instruction that includes classroom argumentation and instructional dialogues.
“KCs with rationales (i.e., are not conventions, but reflect discoverable principles) imply instruction that includes classroom argumentation and instructional dialogues (Michaels, O'Connor, & Resnick, 2008).”
From The Knowledge‐Learning‐Instruction Framework: Bridging the Science‐Practice Chasm to Enhance Robust Student Learning (2012) · cites this paper as Michaels, O'Connor, & Resnick, 2008
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Koedinger, K. R., Corbett, A. T., & Perfetti, C. (2012) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01245.x · Cited by 772 · see citing works
“Michaels et al. (2008) Optimizing scheduling is a more specific version of the spacing principle and builds on Pavlik's (2007) observation that much past research has not controlled for time on task and thus has underestimated the benefit of shorter practice intervals early in KC acquisition.”
BackgroundTeacher–Student Dialogue During Classroom Teaching: Does It Really Impact on Student Outcomes?
Howe, C., Hennessy, S., Mercer, N., Vrikki, M., & Wheatley, L. (2019) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1080/10508406.2019.1573730 · Cited by 425 · see citing works
Developing dialogic teaching: genesis, process, trial
Alexander, R. (2018) · Research Papers in Education · doi:10.1080/02671522.2018.1481140 · Cited by 397 · see citing works
Dialogic Argumentation as a Vehicle for Developing Young Adolescents’ Thinking
Kuhn, D., & Crowell, A. (2011) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797611402512 · Cited by 363 · see citing works
Argumentation for Learning: Well-Trodden Paths and Unexplored Territories
Asterhan, C. S. C., & Schwarz, B. B. (2016) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2016.1155458 · Cited by 338 · see citing works
Developing Dialogic Argumentation Skills: A 3-year Intervention Study
Crowell, A., & Kuhn, D. (2014) · Journal of Cognition and Development · doi:10.1080/15248372.2012.725187 · Cited by 179 · see citing works
Towards an Agile Approach to Adapting Dynamic Collaboration Support to Student Needs
Adamson, D., Dyke, G., Jang, H., & Rosé, C. P. (2014) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-013-0012-6 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Online moderation of synchronous e-argumentation
Asterhan, C. S. C., & Schwarz, B. B. (2010) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-010-9088-2 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Characterizing the formative assessment enactment of experienced science teachers
Dini, V., Sevian, H., Caushi, K., & Orduña Picón, R. (2020) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.21559 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Engaging Girls’ Sociohistorical Identities in Science
Thompson, J. (2014) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1080/10508406.2014.888351 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Felton, M., Crowell, A., Garcia-Mila, M., & Villarroel, C. (2022) · Learning, Culture and Social Interaction · doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.100350 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Towards Academically Productive Talk Supported by Conversational Agents
Dyke, G., Howley, I., Adamson, D., Kumar, R., & Rosé, C. P. (2013) · Productive Multivocality in the Analysis of Group Interactions · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-8960-3_25 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Tao, Y., Wang, D., & Chen, G. (2026) · British Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1002/berj.70031 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Chen, E., Guan, C., Elshafiey, A., Zhao, Z., Zekeri, J., Shaibu, A. E., Prince, E. O., & Wu, C. J. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.18832
“…broadcasting: (1) structured dialogue protocols requiring agents to reference prior contributions before posting, similar to Accountable Talk [23]; (2) question scaffolding to counteract the broadcasting bias [1]; (3) collaborative task structures (joint debugging, peer review of skills)…”
- Authors
- Michaels, S., O’Connor, C., & Resnick, L. B.
- Affiliations
- Clark University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Michaels, Sarah
- ORCID
- Michaels, Sarah
- Venue
- Studies in Philosophy and Education
- Published
- 2007-11-15
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 283-297
- ISSN
- 0039-3746 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-191X
- OpenAlex
- W2019566340
- Cited by
- 853
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 70 · 2025: 71 · 2024: 69 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 82 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 65 · 2019: 59 · 2018: 56 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 54 · 2015: 58 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 43.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Studies in Philosophy and Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Education, Philosophy, and Society
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy
- Keywords
- accountable talk, deliberative discourse, classroom discussion, citizen participation, discourse norms, diverse students, academic performance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
