Cited by 204Public Policy and Administration ResearchPublic Administration and GovernancePublic Administration and Political Analysis

The listening bureaucrat: Responsiveness in public administration

Stivers, Camilla·1994·Public Administration Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/977384

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stivers, C.
Corresponding author
Stivers, Camilla
Venue
Public Administration Review
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1994-07
Volume
54
Issue
4
Pages
364
ISSN
0033-3352 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4253485933
Cited by
204
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 8
FWCI
6.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Public Administration Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration and Political Analysis
Keywords
bureaucratic responsiveness, public administration, citizen participation, government responsiveness, citizen-government relations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review