Cited by 280History and Developments in AstronomyHistorical and Architectural StudiesGlobal History, Politics, and Ideology

The Great Alignment: Race, Party Transformation, and the Rise of Donald Trump

Abramowitz, Alan I.·2018·Yale University Press eBooks

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/j.ctvhrczh3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is a strong consensus among scholars of politics in the USA that liberal and conservative political elites have grown increasingly polarized over the past few decades.

    “For example, there is a strong consensus among scholars of politics in the USA that liberal and conservative political elites (including members of Congress, party activists, donors and judicial appointees) have grown increasingly polarized over the past few decades27–34.”

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abramowitz, A. I.
Corresponding author
Abramowitz, Alan I.
Venue
Yale University Press eBooks
Published
2018-06-19
OpenAlex
W4248644933
Cited by
280
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 49 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 7
FWCI
27.87
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Yale University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › History and Developments in Astronomy
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Historical and Architectural Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Global History, Politics, and Ideology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review