The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128, With a New Preface by the Author
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems
Wenger, E. (2000) · Organization · doi:10.1177/135050840072002 · Cited by 4,274
van Kersbergen, K., & van Waarden, F. (2004) · European Journal of Political Research · doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2004.00149.x · Cited by 971
Looking inside the spiky bits: a critical review and conceptualisation of entrepreneurial ecosystems
Brown, R., & Mason, C. (2017) · Small Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11187-017-9865-7 · Cited by 852
Kaufmann, A., & Tödtling, F. (2001) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(00)00118-9 · Cited by 526
Kreiss, D., & MCGREGOR, S. C. (2018) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2017.1364814 · Cited by 398
Panacea or diagnosis? Imaginaries of innovation and the ‘MIT model’ in three political cultures
Pfotenhauer, S., & Jasanoff, S. (2017) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/0306312717706110 · Cited by 211
DiVito, L., & Ingen-Housz, Z. (2021) · Small Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11187-019-00254-6 · Cited by 89
Computational parasites and hydropower: A political ecology of Bitcoin mining on the Columbia River
Lally, N., Kay, K., & Thatcher, J. (2022) · Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space · doi:10.1177/2514848619867608 · Cited by 43
Barnes, T. J. (2018) · Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space · doi:10.1177/0308518x17707524 · Cited by 26
Brock, D. C. (2012) · History and Technology · doi:10.1080/07341512.2012.756236 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Saxenian, A.
- Venue
- Harvard University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Harvard University Press
- Published
- 1996-03-01
- OpenAlex
- W4249543445
- Cited by
- 538
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.20
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.