Psychological predicates
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Knowing whether a particular kind of entity falls within the distribution of consciousness may have an important bearing on accounts of the nature of consciousness, such as whether it is necessarily unified, comes in degrees, or is multiply realized.
“The scienti fi c importance of developing C-tests is clear, for knowing whether a particular kind of entity falls within the distribution of consciousness may have an important bearing on accounts of the nature of consciousness, such as whether it is necessarily uni fi ed [41], comes in degrees [42], or is multiply realized [43,44].”
From Tests for consciousness in humans and beyond (2024) · cites this paper as [43]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Multiple Realizability Revisited: Linking Cognitive and Neural States
Bechtel, W., & Mundale, J. (1999) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/392683 · Cited by 483 · see citing works
Hard criteria for empirical theories of consciousness
Doerig, A., Schurger, A., & Herzog, M. H. (2021) · Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17588928.2020.1772214 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Tests for consciousness in humans and beyond
Bayne, T., Seth, A. K., Massimini, M., Shepherd, J., Cleeremans, A., Fleming, S. M., Malach, R., Mattingley, J. B., Menon, D. K., Owen, A. M., et al. (2024) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2024.01.010 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Phenomenal Consciousness and Emergence: Eliminating the Explanatory Gap
Feinberg, T. E., & Mallatt, J. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01041 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
The Nature of Physical Computation
Shagrir, O. (2022) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197552384.001.0001 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Can a machine think (anything new)? Automation beyond simulation
Fazi, M. B. (2019) · AI & SOCIETY · doi:10.1007/s00146-018-0821-0 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Multiple realizability and the spirit of functionalism
Cao, R. (2022) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-022-03524-1 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Causal reductionism and causal structures
Grasso, M., Albantakis, L., Lang, J. P., & Tononi, G. (2021) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-021-00911-8 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Consensus-building conversation leads to neural alignment
Sievers, B., Welker, C., Hasson, U., Kleinbaum, A. M., & Wheatley, T. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/562z7 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Uploading and Branching Identity
Cerullo, M. A. (2015) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-014-9352-8 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
- Authors
- PUTNAM, H.
- Corresponding author
- PUTNAM, HILARY
- Venue
- Art, Mind, and Religion
- Publisher
- University of Pittsburgh Press
- Published
- 1967-03-15
- Pages
- 37-68
- OpenAlex
- W4386456244
- Cited by
- 778
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 54 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 91 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 98 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 94 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- University of Pittsburgh Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Social Sciences › Psychology › General Psychology › Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
- Keywords
- psychological predicates, mental states
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
