Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 936

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Effect of SOX Internal Control Deficiencies and Their Remediation on Accrual Quality

Ashbaugh-Skaife, Hollis, Collins, Daniel W., Kinney, William R., LaFond, Ryan·2008·The Accounting Review

Abstract

This paper investigates the effect of internal control deficiencies and their remediation on accrual quality. We first document that firms reporting internal control deficiencies have lower quality accruals as measured by accrual noise and absolute abnormal accruals relative to firms not reporting internal control problems. Second, we find that firms that report internal control deficiencies have significantly larger positive and larger negative abnormal accruals relative to control firms. This finding suggests internal control weaknesses are more likely to lead to unintentional errors that add noise to accruals than intentional misstatements that bias earnings upward. Third, we document that firms whose auditors confirm remediation of previously reported internal control deficiencies exhibit an increase in accrual quality relative to firms that do not remediate their control problems. Finally, we find firms that receive different internal control audit opinions in successive years exhibit changes in accrual quality consistent with changes in internal control quality. Collectively, our cross-sectional and intertemporal change tests provide strong evidence that the quality of internal control affects the quality of accruals.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2308/accr.2008.83.1.217

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. 10.2307/2978933 · doi:10.2307/2978933 · Paper page
  2. 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2006.00198.x · doi:10.1111/j.1475-679x.2006.00198.x
  3. Dechow P., 1995, The Accounting Review, 70, 193
  4. Francis J., 1988, The Accounting Review, 63, 663
  5. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). 2002. Certification of Disclosure in Companies' Quarterly and Annual Reports. Release Nos. 33-8124, 34-46427. Washington, D.C.: SEC.

Cited by

See all 936

Metadata

Authors
Ashbaugh-Skaife, H., Collins, D. W., Kinney, W. R., & LaFond, R.
Venue
The Accounting Review
Published
2008-01-01
Volume
83
Issue
1
Pages
217-250
ISSN
  • 0001-4826 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-7967
OpenAlex
W3122726372
Cited by
936
References
23
FWCI
128.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Effect of SOX Internal Control Deficiencies and Their Remediation on Accrual Quality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2308/accr.2008.83.1.217
The paper
Ashbaugh-Skaife, H., Collins, D. W., Kinney, W. R., & LaFond, R. (2008). The Effect of SOX Internal Control Deficiencies and Their Remediation on Accrual Quality. The Accounting Review. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2008.83.1.217

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.