The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Development of a Scale to Measure Professional Skepticism
Abstract
SUMMARY: Professional skepticism is an important concept in audit practice, as evidenced by its prominence throughout the auditing standards. In this paper I propose that professional skepticism is a multi-dimensional individual characteristic. As an individual characteristic, professional skepticism can be both a trait (a relatively stable, enduring aspect of an individual) and also a state (a temporary condition aroused by situational variables). I develop a scale designed to ex ante measure an individual’s level of trait professional skepticism based on characteristics derived from audit standards, psychology, philosophy, and consumer behavior research. I conduct a rigorous and iterative scale validation process using students and professional auditors. The final 30-item professional skepticism scale with instructions for use is included, as well as suggestions for future research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.
Rotter, J. B. (1966) · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied · doi:10.1037/h0092976 · Cited by 21,937
A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs
Churchill, G. A. (1979) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377901600110 · Cited by 16,549
Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development.
Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309 · Cited by 6,567
Messick, S. (1995) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.50.9.741 · Cited by 4,198
Individual differences in need for cognitive closure.
Webster, D. M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1994) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1049 · Cited by 2,494
Interpersonal trust, trustworthiness, and gullibility.
Rotter, J. B. (1980) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.35.1.1 · Cited by 1,694
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA)
(2018) · The Grants Register 2018 · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-94186-5_84 · Cited by 1,504
How to Measure Survey Reliability and Validity
Litwin, M. (1995) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781483348957 · Cited by 1,459
Survey Methods in Social Investigation.
T., C. G., & Moser, C. A. (1958) · The Incorporated Statistician · doi:10.2307/2986383 · Cited by 1,434
Development of a Scale to Measure Consumer Skepticism Toward Advertising
Obermiller, C., & Spangenberg, E. R. (1998) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15327663jcp0702_03 · Cited by 1,037
Cited by
Auditor Mindsets and Audits of Complex Estimates
GRIFFITH, E. E., HAMMERSLEY, J. S., KADOUS, K., & YOUNG, D. (2015) · Journal of Accounting Research · doi:10.1111/1475-679x.12066 · Cited by 294
Metadata
- Authors
- Hurtt, R. K.
- Venue
- AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory
- Publisher
- American Accounting Association
- Published
- 2010-05-01
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 149-171
- ISSN
- 0278-0380 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-7991
- OpenAlex
- W1972078990
- Cited by
- 473
- References
- 46
- FWCI
- 45.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development of a Scale to Measure Professional Skepticism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2308/aud.2010.29.1.149
- The paper
- Hurtt, R. K. (2010). Development of a Scale to Measure Professional Skepticism. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2010.29.1.149
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.