ECOLOGICAL TREATISE ON THE RUMEN FERMENTATION
Open accessAbstract
The biochemical features of bacterial population in the gauze filtrate fraction or other respective bacterial fractions gradually eluted from the digesta solids were examined for their activities towards cellulose, starch or succinate. The rumen contents of sheep fed hay and concentrates was squeezed through a layer of two sheets of gauze to obtain the digesta solids. The results obtained were as follows:1) The distribution of Veillonella alcalescens in each fraction was examined on the basis of succinate decarboxylation. Values of QCO2 of G and W1 fractions exceeded those of W2 and T fractions and the pattern of distribution of QCO2 in each fraction was quite similar with pattern of the viable count of this species.2) Gauze filtrate fraction was superior to the other fractions in the production of volatile fatty acid from cellulose or starch. Furthermore, T fraction showed considerable production of volatile fatty acids from starch, and in this respect exceeded W2 fraction although less in cell density.3) G fraction was least active in cellulolytic activity compared to the other fractions. The amylolytic activity of G fraction was greater than the other fractions, followed by T fraction with a slight differences. Moreover, G fraction was most active in the proteolytic activity compared to the other fractions.4) An attempt was made to adsorb the cells contained in G and T fractions on starch or cellulose. When the bacteria in G fraction were treated with starch, greater decrease in cell amount was observed than in T fraction. While, only a slight difference was indicated between both fractions at the treatment with cellulose. In the specific amylolytic activity of G fraction a significant decrease was well observed with the treatment with starch as compared with T fraction.The above results were discussed with relation to those of distribution of the rumen bacteria in each bacterial fraction as previously reported.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The biofilm phenotype enables effective hydrolysis of plant material within the rumen by concentrating digestive enzymes within the EPS in proximity to the substrate.
“The biofilm phenotype has many advantages, including the concentration of digestive enzymes within the EPS in proximity to the substrate, an arrangement that enables effective hydrolysis of plant material within the rumen (Minato et al., 1966; Wolin et al., 1997; Michalet-Doreau et al., 2001; Leng, 2014).”
From Addressing global ruminant agricultural challenges through understanding the rumen microbiome: past, present, and future (2018) · cites this paper as Minato et al., 1966
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Microdiffusion Analysis and Volumetric Error
(1948) · Nature · doi:10.1038/161583a0 · Cited by 2,182 · see citing works
Microdiffusion Analysis and Volumetric Error
Aldridge, W. N. (1951) · Occupational and Environmental Medicine · doi:10.1136/oem.8.3.187-a · Cited by 499 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- H. MINATO, A. ENDO, M. HIGUCHI, Y. OOTOMO and T. UEMURA: J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol., 12, 39 (1966).
- A. K. SIJPESTEIJN and S. R. ELSDEN: Biochem. J., 52, 41 (1952).
- M. SOMOGYI : J. Biol. Chem., 195, 20 (1952).
- FOLIN and V. CIOCALTEU: J. Biol. Chem., 73, 627 (1927).
- M. RoGosA: J. Bacteriol., 72, 533 (1956).
- M. P. BRYANT and L. A. BURKEY: J. Dairy Sci., 36, 218 (1953).
- M. HIGUCHI, C. FURUSAKA and T. UEMURA : J. Agr. Chem. Soc. Japan, 36, 455 (1962), in Japanese.
- F. KUMENO and M. KANDATSU: J. Arg. Chem. Soc. Japan, 33, 867 (1959), in Japanese.
- G. J. THOMAS: J. Agr. Sci., 54, 360 (1960).
- A. C. I. WARNER: J. Gen. Microbiol., 28, 119 (1962).
- R. E. HUNGATE: Bacteriol. Proc., p. 41 (1962).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Huws, S. A., Creevey, C. J., Oyama, L. B., Mizrahi, I., Denman, S. E., Popova, M., Muñoz-Tamayo, R., Forano, E., Waters, S. M., Hess, M., et al. (2018) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.02161 · Cited by 487 · see citing works
Protein-Energy Interrelationships in Dairy Cows
Oldham, J. D. (1984) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(84)81410-1 · Cited by 316 · see citing works
Electron microscopy of bacteria involved in the digestion of plant cell walls
Cheng, K.-J., Stewart, C. S., Dinsdale, D. D., & Costerton, J. W. (1984) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/0377-8401(84)90002-6 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Michalet-Doreau, B., & OULD-BAH, M. Y. (1992) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/0377-8401(92)90112-j · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Koike, S., Yoshitani, S., Kobayashi, Y., & Tanaka, K. (2003) · FEMS Microbiology Letters · doi:10.1016/s0378-1097(03)00760-2 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
LEGAY-CARMIER, F., & Bauchart, D. (1989) · British Journal Of Nutrition · doi:10.1079/bjn19890158 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
McAllister, T. A., Hristov, A. N., Beauchemin, K. A., Rode, L. M., & Cheng, K.-J. (2001) · CABI Publishing eBooks · doi:10.1079/9780851993935.0273 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Adherent rumen bacteria — their role in the digestion of plant material, urea and epithelial cells
Cheng, K.-J., & Costerton, J. W. (1980) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-8067-2_11 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Koike, S., Pan, J., Kobayashi, Y., & Tanaka, K. (2003) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(03)73726-6 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Microbial Ecology and Activities in the Rumen: Part I
Hobson, P. N., Wallace, R. J., & Bryant, M. P. (1982) · CRC Critical Reviews in Microbiology · doi:10.3109/10408418209104490 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Kudo, H., Cheng, K.-J., & Costerton, J. W. (1987) · Canadian Journal of Microbiology · doi:10.1139/m87-045 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Cheng, K.-J., & McAllister, T. A. (1997) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-1453-7_12 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Clostridium thermocellum: Adhesion and sporulation while adhered to cellulose and hemicellulose
Wiegel, J., & Dykstra, M. J. (1984) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/bf00254647 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Silva, A. T., Wallace, R. J., & Ørskov, E. R. (1987) · British Journal Of Nutrition · doi:10.1079/bjn19870048 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Advances in microbial ecosystem concepts and their consequences for ruminant agriculture
Edwards, J. E., Huws, S. A., Kim, E. J., Lee, M. R. F., Kingston-Smith, A. H., & Scollan, N. D. (2008) · animal · doi:10.1017/s1751731108002164 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Huhtanen, P. J., & Khalili, H. (1992) · British Journal Of Nutrition · doi:10.1079/bjn19920028 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Who eats what? Unravelling microbial conversion of coal to methane
Vick, S. H. W., Gong, S., Sestak, S., Vergara, T., Pinetown, K. L., Li, Z., Greenfield, P. A., Tetu, S. G., Midgley, D. J., & Paulsen, I. T. (2019) · FEMS Microbiology Ecology · doi:10.1093/femsec/fiz093 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
The distribution of polysaccharide-degrading enzymes in the bovine rumen digesta ecosystem
Williams, A. G., & Strachan, N. H. (1984) · Current Microbiology · doi:10.1007/bf01627258 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Vick, S. H. W., Greenfield, P. A., Pinetown, K. L., Sherwood, N., Gong, S., Tetu, S. G., Midgley, D. J., & Paulsen, I. T. (2019) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2019.01.011 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Coleman, G. S. (1986) · The Journal of Agricultural Science · doi:10.1017/s0021859600061827 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Bala, P. A., MALIK, R., & SRINIVAS, B. (2009) · Animal Science Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1740-0929.2009.00634.x · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Granja-Salcedo, Y. T., Uscátegui, R. A. R., Sierra, E. G. M., Messana, J. D., Kishi, L. T., Dias, A. V. L., & Berchielli, T. T. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0176701 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Williams, A. G., Withers, S. E., & Strachan, N. H. (1989) · Journal of Applied Bacteriology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.1989.tb02449.x · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Yang, H. E., Zotti, C. A., McKinnon, J. J., & McAllister, T. A. (2018) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.00718 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Sun, Y., Mao, S., Yao, W., & Zhu, W. (2008) · animal · doi:10.1017/s1751731107001231 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Densities of Ruminal Protozoa of Sheep Established Under Different Dietary Conditions
Nakamura, K. T., & Kanegasaki, S. (1969) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(69)86538-0 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Inoculum for In Vitro Rumen Fermentation and Composition of Volatile Fatty Acids
Senshu, T., Nakamura, K., Sawa, A., Miura, H., & Matsumoto, T. (1980) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(80)82931-6 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Distribution of cellulose-binding proteins among the representative strainsof rumen bacteria.
Mitsumori, M., & Minato, H. (1995) · The Journal of General and Applied Microbiology · doi:10.2323/jgam.41.297 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Self-citationInteractions between rumen bacteria and ciliate protozoa in their attachment to barley straw
Newbold, C. J., Griffin, P. W., & Wallace, R. J. (1989) · Letters in Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1472-765x.1989.tb00224.x · Cited by 13 · see citing works
The effect of pH and 1,4-dithiothreitol on the adhesion of rumen bacteria
Kopečný, J., Jurčuk, J. F., & Bartoš, S. (1983) · Folia Microbiologica · doi:10.1007/bf02877369 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Rumen Microbiology and Microbial Degradation of Feedstuffs
Paswan, V. K., Kumar, K., & Shehata, A. M. (2022) · Soil biology · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-97291-2_4 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Enzymes as Direct-Feed Additives for Ruminants
Rode, L. M., McAllister, T. A., Beauchemin, K. A., Morgavi, D. P., Nsereko, V., Yang, W. Z., Iwaasa, A. D., & Wang, Y. (2005) · Kluwer Academic Publishers eBooks · doi:10.1007/0-306-46887-5_17 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Chiquette, J., & Benchaar, C. (1998) · Canadian Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.4141/a97-043 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Thivend, P., Fonty, G., Jouany, J. P., Durand, M., & Gouët, P. (1985) · annales de biologie animale biochimie biophysique · doi:10.1051/rnd:19850601 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Marounek, M., & Barto, S. (1983) · Zeitschrift für Tierphysiologie Tierernährung und Futtermittelkunde · doi:10.1111/j.1439-0396.1983.tb00786.x · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Sung, H. G., Kim, M. J., Upadhaya, S. D., Ha, J. K., & Lee, S. S. (2013) · Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences · doi:10.5713/ajas.2013.13217 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
A new method to estimate microbial nitrogen escape from the rumen of the dairy cow
de Ondarza, M. B., & Sniffen, C. J. (2002) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/s0377-8401(02)00178-5 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Recent Topics in Rumen Microbiology with Particular Reference to Animal Production in Japan
ITABASHI, H. (2004) · Microbes and Environments · doi:10.1264/jsme2.19.270
Mokatse, B. (2015) · Unisa Institutional Repository (University of South Africa)
- Authors
- MINATO, H., ENDO, A., OOTOMO, Y., & UEMURA, T.
- Affiliations
- National Institute of Animal Health (JP)
- ORCID
- ENDO, AKIRA
- Venue
- The Journal of General and Applied Microbiology
- Publisher
- Microbiology Research Foundation
- Published
- 1966
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 53-69
- ISSN
- 0022-1260 (ISSN-L)
- 1349-8037
- OpenAlex
- W2018569540
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 1.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Journal of General and Applied Microbiology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
- Keywords
- rumen fermentation, rumen bacteria, Veillonella alcalescens, volatile fatty acid production, cellulolytic activity, amylolytic activity, proteolytic activity, starch adsorption, cellulose adsorption
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
