Cited by 41Diabetes and associated disordersT-cell and B-cell ImmunologyImmunotherapy and Immune Responses

Slc11a1 Enhances the Autoimmune Diabetogenic T-Cell Response by Altering Processing and Presentation of Pancreatic Islet Antigens

Open access
Dai, Yang D., Marrero, Idania G., Gros, Philippe, Zaghouani, Habib, Wicker, Linda S., Sercarz, Eli E.·2009·Diabetes

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Efforts to map non-major histocompatibility complex (MHC) genes causing type 1 diabetes in NOD mice identified Slc11a1, formerly Nramp1, as the leading candidate gene in the Idd5.2 region. Slc11a1 is a membrane transporter of bivalent cations that is expressed in late endosomes and lysosomes of macrophages and dendritic cells (DCs). Because DCs are antigen-presenting cells (APCs) known to be critically involved in the immunopathogenic events leading to type 1 diabetes, we hypothesized that Slc11a1 alters the processing or presentation of islet-derived antigens to T-cells. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: NOD mice having wild-type (WT) or mutant Slc11a1 molecules and 129 mice having WT or null Slc11a1 alleles were examined for parameters associated with antigen presentation. RESULTS: We found that Slc11a1 enhanced the presentation of a diabetes-related T-cell determinant of GAD65, and its function contributed to the activation of a pathogenic T-cell clone, BDC2.5. An enhanced generation of interferon (IFN)-gamma-producing T-cells was also associated with functional Slc11a1. The alteration of immune responsiveness by Slc11a1 genotype did not correlate with altered MHC class II expression in DCs; however, functional Slc11a1 was associated with accelerated phagocytosis and phagosomal acidification in DCs. CONCLUSIONS: The association of variants encoding Slc11a1 with type 1 diabetes may reflect its function in processing and presentation of islet self-antigens in DCs. Thus, non-MHC genes could affect the MHC-restricted T-cell response through altered antigen processing and presentation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/db07-1608

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many effectors of microbial iron withdrawal have direct or indirect impact on acquired immunity, such as the function of lymphocyte subsets.

    “Furthermore, many effectors of microbial iron withdrawal have direct or indirect impact on acquired immunity such as the function of lymphocyte subsets (Dai et al., 2009;Hedges et al., 2013;Lee et al., 2020;Stober et al., 2007).”

    From Iron in infection and immunity (2020) · cites this paper as Dai et al., 2009

    The Discussion ('Proinflammatory activity of Slc11a1') reports that Slc11a1 promotes a Th1 T-cell response, supporting an effect on acquired immunity. The Discussion ('Enhanced intracellular vesicle fusion and/or acidification by Slc11a1') describes possible deprivation of divalent cations during intracellular infection, but does not establish iron withdrawal specifically. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dai, Y. D., Marrero, I. G., Gros, P., Zaghouani, H., Wicker, L. S., & Sercarz, E. E.
Affiliations
  • Torrey Pines Institute For Molecular Studies (US)
  • McGill University (CA)
  • University of Missouri (US)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Venue
Diabetes
Published
2009-01-01
Volume
58
Issue
1
Pages
156-164
ISSN
  • 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-327X
OpenAlex
W2163081237
Cited by
41
References
47
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Diabetes (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (061859/B/00/Z)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
Keywords
SLC11A1, NRAMP1, type 1 diabetes, autoimmune diabetes, dendritic cells, antigen processing and presentation, GAD65, interferon-gamma, phagosome acidification, phagocytosis, non-MHC genes, NOD mice, MHC class II
MeSH terms
Natural Resistance-associated Macrophage Protein 1, Animals, Histocompatibility Antigens Class II, Cells, Cultured, Dendritic Cells, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Flow Cytometry, Islets of Langerhans, Macrophages, Phagocytosis, T-Lymphocytes, Blotting, Western, Autoimmunity, Mice, Inbred NOD, Antigen Presentation, B7-1 Antigen, Mice, Knockout, Cation Transport Proteins, Cell Proliferation, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review