Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 195

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Posttranslational Modification of HLA-DQ Binding Islet Autoantigens in Type 1 Diabetes

Open access
van Lummel, Menno, Duinkerken, Gaby, van Veelen, Peter A., de Ru, Arnoud, Cordfunke, Robert, Zaldumbide, Arnaud, Gomez-Touriño, Iria, Arif, Sefina, Peakman, Mark, Drijfhout, Jan W., Roep, Bart O.·2014·Diabetes

Abstract

Posttranslational modification (PTM) of islet autoantigens can cause lack of central tolerance in type 1 diabetes (T1D). Tissue transglutaminase (tTG), involved in PTM of gluten antigens in celiac disease, creates negatively charged peptides favored by T1D-predisposing HLA-DQ molecules, offering an attractive candidate modifying islet autoantigens in T1D. The highly predisposing HLA-DQ8cis/trans molecules share preferences for negatively charged peptides, as well as distinct peptide-binding characteristics that distinguish their peptide-binding repertoire. We screened islet autoantigens with the tTG substrate motif for candidate-modified epitopes binding to HLA-DQ8cis/trans and identified 31 candidate islet epitopes. Deamidation was confirmed for 28 peptides (90%). Two of these epitopes preferentially bound to HLA-DQ8cis and six to HLA-DQ8trans upon deamidation, whereas all other peptides bound equally to HLA-DQ8cis/trans. HLA-DQ8cis–restricted T cells from a new-onset T1D patient could only be generated against a deamidated proinsulin peptide, but cross-reacted with native proinsulin peptide upon restimulation. The rate of T-cell autoreactivity in recent-onset T1D patients extended from 42% to native insulin to 68% adding responses to modified proinsulin, versus 20% and 37% respectively, in healthy donors. Most patients responded by interferon-γ, whereas most healthy donors produced interleukin-10 only. Thus, T-cell autoreactivity exists to modified islet epitopes that differs in quality and quantity between patients and healthy donors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/db12-1214

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 195

Metadata

Authors
van Lummel, M., Duinkerken, G., van Veelen, P. A., de Ru, A., Cordfunke, R., Zaldumbide, A., Gomez-Touriño, I., Arif, S., Peakman, M., Drijfhout, J. W., & Roep, B. O.
Venue
Diabetes
Published
2013-12-13
Volume
63
Issue
1
Pages
237-247
ISSN
  • 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-327X
OpenAlex
W2158735251
Cited by
195
References
2
FWCI
8.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Posttranslational Modification of HLA-DQ Binding Islet Autoantigens in Type 1 Diabetes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/db12-1214
The paper
van Lummel, M., Duinkerken, G., van Veelen, P. A., de Ru, A., Cordfunke, R., Zaldumbide, A., Gomez-Touriño, I., Arif, S., Peakman, M., Drijfhout, J. W., & Roep, B. O. (2014). Posttranslational Modification of HLA-DQ Binding Islet Autoantigens in Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes. https://doi.org/10.2337/db12-1214

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.