Cited by 35Healthcare Policy and ManagementDiabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Management and Research

Improving diabetes care: the model for health care reform

Open access
Kahn, Richard, Anderson, John E.·2009·Diabetes Care

Abstract

A s policy makers now debate the el-ements of health care reform, themedical management of diabetes is an excellent “case study ” and in nearly all ways epitomizes the problems the coun-try faces. The most obvious way in which diabetes epitomizes the need for health care reform is that chronic diseases, not acute infectious disorders, are the current and growing health-related financial drain on the country. Of the six leading causes of death in the U.S., four are chronic diseases (1). In 2005, 44 % of adult Americans had at least one chronic condition, and diabetes (without compli-cations), hypertension, and hyperlipid-emia were the three most prevalent,

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc09-0184

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Care models that consider cultural influences and personal, family, and community resources and adapt care to the individual's values and lifestyle are more likely to succeed.

    “Care models that take into account cultural influences, as well as personal, family, and community resources, and tailor care to the core values and lifestyle of the individual are more likely to be successful (2).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kahn, R., & Anderson, J. E.
Affiliations
  • American Diabetes Association (US)
  • The Frist Clinic, Nashville, Tennessee.
Corresponding author
Kahn, Richard
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2009-06-01
Volume
32
Issue
6
Pages
1115-1118
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2102968597
Cited by
35
References
39
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
5.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
health care reform, chronic disease management, health care costs, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, health policy
MeSH terms
Adult, Chronic Disease, Diabetes Mellitus, Humans, Quality Assurance, Health Care, United States, Health Behavior, Health Care Reform

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review