Cited by 180Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes and associated disordersDiabetes Management and Education

Prolonged Nocturnal Hypoglycemia Is Common During 12 Months of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Children and Adults With Type 1 Diabetes

Open access
Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Study Group·2010·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the amount of nocturnal hypoglycemia and evaluate factors associated with nocturnal hypoglycemia assessed with continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in adults and children with type 1 diabetes who participated in the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation CGM randomized clinical trial. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The analysis included 36,467 nights with ≥4 h of CGM glucose readings between 12 midnight and 6:00 a.m. from 176 subjects assigned to the CGM group of the trial. The percentage of nights in which hypoglycemia occurred (two consecutive CGM readings ≤60 mg/dl in 20 min) was computed for each subject. Associations with baseline characteristics and clinical factors were evaluated using a multivariate regression model. RESULTS: Hypoglycemic events occurred during 8.5% of nights, with the median percentage of nights with hypoglycemia per subject being 7.4% (interquartile range 3.7–12.1%). The duration of hypoglycemia was ≥2 h on 23% of nights with hypoglycemia. In a multivariate model, a higher incidence of nocturnal hypoglycemia was associated with 1) lower baseline A1C levels (P < 0.001) and 2) the occurrence of hypoglycemia on one or more nights during baseline blinded CGM (P < 0.001). The hypoglycemia frequency was not associated with age or with insulin modality (pump versus multiple daily injections). CONCLUSIONS: Nocturnal hypoglycemia is frequent and often prolonged in adults and children with type 1 diabetes. Patients with low A1C levels are at an increased risk for its occurrence. One week of blinded CGM can identify patients who are at greater risk for nocturnal hypoglycemia.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc09-2081

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a second study, continuous glucose monitoring lowered nocturnal hypoglycaemia in children (<18 years) with type 1 diabetes, compared with self-monitored blood glucose.

    “In a second study, continuous glucose monitoring lowered nocturnal hypoglycaemia in children (<18 years) with type 1 diabetes, compared with self-monitored blood glucose.92”

    From Type 1 diabetes (2014) · cites this paper as [92]

    The Research Design and Methods section includes children with type 1 diabetes, but this analysis uses only participants assigned to the CGM group. The Results report nocturnal hypoglycemia during CGM use; they do not compare it with self-monitored blood glucose or show that CGM lowered it in children. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. [3]Sovik O Thordarson H: Dead-in-bed syndrome in young diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 1999; 22(Suppl. 2): B40– B42 10097898
  2. [4]McMahon SK Ferreira LD Ratnam N Davey RJ Youngs LM Davis EA Fournier PA Jones TW: Glucose requirements to maintain euglycemia after moderate-intensity afternoon exercise in adolescents with type 1 diabetes are increased in a biphasic manner. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2007; 92: 963– 968 17118993
  3. [5]Diabetes Research in Children Network (DirecNet) Study Group. The effects of aerobic exercise on glucose and counterregulatory hormone concentrations in children with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2006; 29: 20– 25 16373890 PMC2396943
  4. [6]Diabetes Research in Children Network (DirecNet) Study Group. Impaired overnight counterregulatory hormone responses to spontaneous hypoglycemia in children with type 1 diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes 2007; 8: 199– 205 17659061 PMC1986771
  5. [7]Jones TW Porter P Sherwin RS Davis EA O'Leary P Frazer F Byrne G Stick S Tamborlane WV: Decreased epinephrine responses to hypoglycemia during sleep. N Engl J Med 1998; 338: 1657– 1662 9614256
  6. [8]Wilson D Chase HP Kollman C Xing D Caswell K Tansey M Fox L Weinzimer S Beck R Ruedy K Tamborlane W: Diabetes Research in Children Network (DirecNet) Study Group. Low-fat vs. high-fat bedtime snacks in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes 2008; 9: 320– 325 18768036 PMC2593894
  7. [9]Boland E Monsod T Delucia M Brandt CA Fernando S Tamborlane WV: Limitations of conventional methods of self-monitoring of blood glucose: lessons learned from 3 days of continuous glucose sensing in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2001; 24: 1858– 1862 11679447
  8. [10]Diabetes Research In Children Network (DirecNet) Study Group. Impact of exercise on overnight glycemic control in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus. J Pediatr 2005; 147: 528– 534 16227041 PMC2258153
  9. [11]Kaufman FR Austin J Neinstein A Jeng L Halvorson M Devoe DJ Pitukcheewanont P: Nocturnal hypoglycemia detected with the continuous glucose monitoring system in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes. J Pediatr 2002; 141: 625– 630 12410189
  10. [12]Wentholt IM Maran A Masurel N Heine RJ Hoekstra JB DeVries JH: Nocturnal hypoglycaemia in type 1 diabetic patients, assessed with continuous glucose monitoring: frequency, duration and associations. Diabet Med 2007; 24: 527– 532 17381503
  11. [13]Wiltshire EJ Newton K McTavish L: Unrecognised hypoglycaemia in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes using the continuous glucose monitoring system: prevalence and contributors. J Paediatr Child Health 2006; 42: 758– 763 17096709
  12. [14]Woodward A Weston P Casson IF Gill GV: Nocturnal hypoglycaemia in type 1 diabetes—frequency and predictive factors. QJM 2009; 102: 603– 607 19574471
  13. [15]Buckingham B Wilson DM Lecher T Hanas R Kaiserman K Cameron F: Duration of nocturnal hypoglycemia before seizures. Diabetes Care 2008; 31: 2110– 2112 18694975 PMC2571056
  14. [18]Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Study Group. Sustained benefit of continuous glucose monitoring on HbA1c, glucose profiles, and hypoglycemia in adults with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2009; 32: 2047– 2049 19675193 PMC2768224
  15. [19]JDRF CGM Study Group. JDRF randomized clinical trial to assess the efficacy of real-time continuous glucose monitoring in the management of type 1 diabetes: research design and methods. Diabetes Technol Ther 2008; 10: 310– 321 18828243
  16. [21]Wilson DM Beck RW Tamborlane WV Dontchev MJ Kollman C Chase P Fox LA Ruedy KJ Tsalikian E Weinzimer SA: DirecNet Study Group. The accuracy of the FreeStyle Navigator continuous glucose monitoring system in children with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2007; 30: 59– 64 17192334 PMC1764630

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Study Group
Affiliations
Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation (CA)
Corresponding author
Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Study Group
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2010-03-03
Volume
33
Issue
5
Pages
1004-1008
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2337375610
Cited by
180
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 17
FWCI
16.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K08DK082386)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
Keywords
nocturnal hypoglycemia, type 1 diabetes, continuous glucose monitoring, hypoglycemia duration, glycemic control, HbA1c, risk factors, children and adults, insulin pump therapy, multiple daily insulin injections
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Blood Glucose, Child, Circadian Rhythm, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Hypoglycemic Agents, Injections, Subcutaneous, Insulin, Insulin Infusion Systems, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Incidence, Multivariate Analysis, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review