Cited by 68Electronic Health Records SystemsDiabetes Management and ResearchMedical Coding and Health Information

Novel Use and Utility of Integrated Electronic Health Records to Assess Rates of Prediabetes Recognition and Treatment: Brief Report From an Integrated Electronic Health Records Pilot Study

Open access
Schmittdiel, Julie A., Adams, Sara R., Segal, Jodi, Griffin, Marie R., Roumie, Christianne L., Ohnsorg, Kris, Grant, Richard W., O’Connor, Patrick J.·2014·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study uses novel methods to examine the frequency of diagnosis and treatment of prediabetes in real-world clinical settings using electronic health record (EHR) data. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We identified a cohort of 358,120 adults with incident prediabetes (fasting plasma glucose [FPG] 100–125 mg/dL or glycated hemoglobin 5.7–6.4% [39–46 mmol/mol]) between 2006 and 2010 and examined rates of diagnosis and treatment in the 6 months after identification. RESULTS: In the 6 months after identification of prediabetes, 18% of patients had their blood glucose levels retested; 13% received a physician diagnosis of prediabetes/hyperglycemia; 31.0% had prediabetes, diabetes, or lifestyle documented in the clinical notes; and <0.1% initiated metformin. Among patients with FPG 120–125 mg/dL, 31% were retested; metformin initiation remained <1%. CONCLUSIONS: Documented rates of follow-up and treatment for prediabetes are low. EHR data may be a valuable tool to improve identification and treatment of prediabetes in the U.S.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc13-1223

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This practice of low metformin prescribing has changed very little in real-world settings up to 2018.

    “Our study shows this practice has changed very little in realworld settings up to 2018. 12,16”

    From Metformin Prescription Rates for Patients with Prediabetes (2022) · cites this paper as [12]

    The Results report that fewer than 1% of patients initiated metformin, supporting the earlier low-prescribing rate used for comparison. The Methods place the cohort in 2006–2010; this paper does not establish that prescribing changed very little through 2018. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Previous studies examining metformin prescriptions have also found low prescribing rates.

    “Previous studies examining metformin prescriptions have also found low prescribing rates.”

    From Metformin Prescription Rates for Patients with Prediabetes (2022) · cites this paper as [12]

  • Diabetes incidence can be reduced through effective preventive interventions, such as participation in intensive lifestyle change programs or pharmacotherapy such as metformin.

    “Studies have shown diabetes incidence can be reduced through effective preventive interventions, such as participation in intensive lifestyle change programs (LCP) like the National Diabetes Prevention Program (National DPP) lifestyle change program, or with pharmacotherapy such as metformin. 7 -12”

    From Metformin Prescription Rates for Patients with Prediabetes (2022) · cites this paper as [12]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. [1]Cowie CC Rust KF Byrd-Holt DD Prevalence of diabetes and impaired fasting glucose in adults in the U.S. population: National Health And Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2002. Diabetes Care 2006; 29: 1263– 1268 16732006
  2. [4]Pan XR, Li GW, Hu YH, et al. Effects of diet and exercise in preventing NIDDM in people with impaired glucose tolerance. The Da Qing IGT and Diabetes Study. Diabetes Care 1997;20:537–544 9096977
  3. [5]Hoerger TJ Hicks KA Sorensen SW Cost-effectiveness of screening for pre-diabetes among overweight and obese U.S. adults. Diabetes Care 2007; 30: 2874– 2879 17698614
  4. [6]Herman WH Edelstein SL Ratner RE Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of diabetes prevention among adherent participants. Am J Manag Care 2013; 19: 194– 202 23544761 PMC3985133
  5. [8]Karve A Hayward RA Prevalence, diagnosis, and treatment of impaired fasting glucose and impaired glucose tolerance in nondiabetic U.S. adults. Diabetes Care 2010; 33: 2355– 2359 20724649 PMC2963494
  6. [9]Jha AK Meaningful use of electronic health records: the road ahead. JAMA 2010; 304: 1709– 1710 20959581
  7. [10]American Diabetes Association Standards of medical care in diabetes—2006. Diabetes Care 2006; 29(Suppl. 1): S4– S42 16373931
  8. [11]American Diabetes Association Standards of medical care in diabetes—2013. Diabetes Care 2013; 36(Suppl. 1): S11– S66 23264422 PMC3537269
  9. [12]Fradkin JE, Roberts BT, Rodgers GP. What's preventing us from preventing type 2 diabetes? N Engl J Med 2012;367:1177–1179 23013070
  10. [15]Garrido T Kumar S Lekas J e-Measures: insight into the challenges and opportunities of automating publicly reported quality measures. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 5 August 2013 [Epub ahead of print] 23831833 PMC3912717

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schmittdiel, J. A., Adams, S. R., Segal, J., Griffin, M. R., Roumie, C. L., Ohnsorg, K., Grant, R. W., & O’Connor, P. J.
Affiliations
  • Kaiser Permanente (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • HealthPartners (US)
Corresponding author
Schmittdiel, Julie A.
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2014-01-11
Volume
37
Issue
2
Pages
565-568
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2047761929
Cited by
68
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
7.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK092986, P30DK092924)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
Keywords
prediabetes, prediabetes diagnosis, fasting blood glucose, HbA1c, follow-up testing, electronic health records, clinical notes, diabetes prevention
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Blood Glucose, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Prediabetic State, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review