Cited by 1,848Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsPhysical Activity and HealthDiabetes Management and Education

The Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study (DPS)

Open access
Lindström, Jaana, Louheranta, Anne, Mannelin, Marjo, Rastas, Merja, Salminen, Virpi, Eriksson, Johan, Uusitupa, Matti, Tuomilehto, Jaakko +1 more·2003·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE—To describe the 1) lifestyle intervention used in the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study, 2) short- and long-term changes in diet and exercise behavior, and 3) effect of the intervention on glucose and lipid metabolism. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—There were 522 middle-aged, overweight subjects with impaired glucose tolerance who were randomized to either a usual care control group or an intensive lifestyle intervention group. The control group received general dietary and exercise advice at baseline and had an annual physician’s examination. The subjects in the intervention group received additional individualized dietary counseling from a nutritionist. They were also offered circuit-type resistance training sessions and advised to increase overall physical activity. The intervention was the most intensive during the first year, followed by a maintenance period. The intervention goals were to reduce body weight, reduce dietary and saturated fat, and increase physical activity and dietary fiber. RESULTS—The intervention group showed significantly greater improvement in each intervention goal. After 1 and 3 years, weight reductions were 4.5 and 3.5 kg in the intervention group and 1.0 and 0.9 kg in the control group, respectively. Measures of glycemia and lipemia improved more in the intervention group. CONCLUSIONS—The intensive lifestyle intervention produced long-term beneficial changes in diet, physical activity, and clinical and biochemical parameters and reduced diabetes risk. This type of intervention is a feasible option to prevent type 2 diabetes and should be implemented in the primary health care system.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diacare.26.12.3230

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study reported a decreased 3-year risk of diabetes by 58% in participants with prediabetes randomized to a lifestyle intervention promoting increased MVPA and healthy dietary changes.

    “Similarly, the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study (FDPS) also reported a decreased 3-year risk of diabetes by 58% in participants with prediabetes who were randomized to a lifestyle intervention promoting increased MVPA (≥150 min per week) and healthy dietary changes [ 91 , 94 ].”

    From Physical activity, cardiorespiratory fitness, and cardiovascular health: A clinical practice statement of the American Society for Preventive Cardiology Part II: Physical activity, cardiorespiratory fitness, minimum and goal intensities for exercise training, prescriptive methods, and special patient populations (2022) · cites this paper as [94]

    The introduction reports a 58% reduction in diabetes risk in the intensive lifestyle group, and the Methods describe randomizing overweight participants with impaired glucose tolerance to an intervention targeting diet and physical activity. The stated activity goal was at least 30 minutes of moderate-intensity activity per day, not the cited ≥150 minutes per week; the paper also reports diabetes incidence over the first three years. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The composite outcome, as defined by CDC 2021 standards, comprises elements each associated with reduced risk of progression to diabetes.

    “The composite outcome, as defined by the CDC in its 2021 standards,29 comprises elements that have each been associated with reduced risk of progression to diabetes.30-34”

    From An AI-Powered Lifestyle Intervention vs Human Coaching in the Diabetes Prevention Program: A Randomized Clinical Trial (2025) · cites this paper as [34]

    The Background for lifestyle intervention section lists weight loss, physical activity, lower dietary fat and saturated fat, and higher fiber as goals based on evidence about diabetes risk factors. The Results and Conclusions report reduced diabetes incidence with the combined intervention, but do not establish that each component of the citing paper’s composite outcome was individually associated with reduced progression risk. The CDC definition is attached to a different citation, not this source. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The strongest evidence for type 2 diabetes prevention comes from several studies, including the DPP.

    “The strongest evidence for type 2 diabetes prevention comes from several studies, including the DPP (26 -28).”
  • Regular physical activity improves cardiovascular risk factors and lowers risk of other chronic diseases.

    “Regular physical activity improves cardiovascular risk factors (BP, lipid profiles, and blood sugar) and lowers the risk of developing other chronic diseases, including type 2 diabetes, osteoporosis, obesity, depression, and cancer of the breast and colon.25”
  • Programs such as the Diabetes Prevention Program or similarly modeled intensive lifestyle intervention programs provide the strongest evidence for T2DM prevention.

    “Programs such as the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) or similarly modeled intensive lifestyle intervention programs provide the strongest evidence for T2DM prevention [102–104].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lindström, J., Louheranta, A., Mannelin, M., Rastas, M., Salminen, V., Eriksson, J., Uusitupa, M., Tuomilehto, J., & for the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study Group
Affiliations
  • Diabetes and Genetic Epidemiology Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Health Promotion, National Public Health Institute, Helsinki, Finland
  • University of Eastern Finland (FI)
  • Oulu Deaconess Institute (FI)
  • Social Insurance Institution (FI)
  • Institute of Nursing and Health Care, Tampere, Finland
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2003-12-01
Volume
26
Issue
12
Pages
3230-3236
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2095645712
Cited by
1,848
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 72 · 2020: 68 · 2019: 64 · 2018: 74 · 2017: 69 · 2016: 85 · 2015: 95 · 2014: 105 · 2013: 128 · 2012: 118
FWCI
43.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Juho Vainion Säätiö
  • Novo Nordisk
  • Diabetestutkimussäätiö
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
Keywords
Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study, type 2 diabetes prevention, lifestyle intervention, impaired glucose tolerance, overweight, weight loss, nutrition counseling, resistance training, physical activity, dietary fat, dietary fiber, glycemia, lipemia, primary care
MeSH terms
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diet, Dietary Fats, Educational Status, Employment, Finland, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Life Style, Middle Aged, Obesity, Patient Education as Topic, Physical Examination, Time Factors, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review