Cited by 261Diabetes and associated disordersDiabetes Management and ResearchPancreatic function and diabetes

Prevalence of detectable C-peptide according to age at diagnosis and duration of type 1 diabetes

Davis, Asa K., DuBose, Stephanie N., Haller, Michael J., Miller, Kellee M., DiMeglio, Linda A., Bethin, Kathleen E., Goland, Robin S., Greenberg, Ellen M. +6 more·2015·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: It is generally accepted that complete β-cell destruction eventually occurs in individuals with type 1 diabetes, which has implications for treatment approaches and insurance coverage. The frequency of residual insulin secretion in a large cohort of individuals at varying ages of diagnosis and type 1 diabetes duration is unknown. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The frequency of residual insulin secretion was determined by measurement of nonfasting serum C-peptide concentration in 919 individuals with type 1 diabetes according to prespecified groups based on age at diagnosis and duration of disease (from 3 to 81 years' duration). Stimulated C-peptide was measured in those with detectable nonfasting values and a group of those with undetectable values as control. RESULTS: The overall frequency of detectable nonfasting C-peptide was 29%, decreasing with time from diagnosis regardless of age at diagnosis. In all duration groups, the frequency of C-peptide was higher with diagnosis age >18 years compared with ≤18 years. Nineteen percent of those with undetectable nonfasting C-peptide were C-peptide positive upon stimulation testing. CONCLUSIONS: The American Diabetes Association’s definition of type 1 diabetes as “usually leading to absolute insulin deficiency” results in clinicians often considering the presence of residual insulin secretion as unexpected in this population. However, our data suggest that residual secretion is present in almost one out of three individuals 3 or more years from type 1 diabetes diagnosis. The frequency of residual C-peptide decreases with time from diagnosis regardless of age at diagnosis, yet at all durations of disease, diagnosis during adulthood is associated with greater frequency and higher values of C-peptide.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc14-1952

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When sensitive C-peptide measurements are performed, 30-80% of people with long-term type 1 diabetes are found to be insulin microsecretors.

    “When sensitive C-peptide measure ments are performed, 30–80% of people with long-term type 1 diabetes are found to be insulin microsecretors.64–67”

    From Type 1 diabetes (2018) · cites this paper as [64]

  • Adult-onset type 1 diabetes mellitus is associated with higher values of C-peptide than in childhood-onset type 1 diabetes mellitus.

    “Similarly, adult-onset T1DM is associated with higher values of C-peptide than in childhood-onset T1DM69, which might be difficult to distinguish from levels observed in T2DM.”

    From The epidemiology of type 1 diabetes mellitus in older adults (2025) · cites this paper as [69]

  • Some adults with type 1 diabetes maintain some insulin secretion for years after diagnosis and may not require insulin treatment at diagnosis.

    “Although profound insulin deficiency is the hallmark of type 1 diabetes, some adults with type 1 diabetes maintain some insulin secretion for years after diagnosis and may not require insulin treatment at diagnosis (5), leading to diagnostic uncertainty about the type of diabetes and its management.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davis, A. K., DuBose, S. N., Haller, M. J., Miller, K. M., DiMeglio, L. A., Bethin, K. E., Goland, R. S., Greenberg, E. M., Liljenquist, D. R., Ahmann, A. J., Marcovina, S. M., Peters, A. L., Beck, R. W., & Greenbaum, C. J.
Affiliations
  • Virginia Mason Medical Center (US)
  • Jaeb Center for Health Research (US)
  • University of Florida (US)
  • Indiana University School of Medicine (US)
  • University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Rocky Mountain Diabetes and Osteoporosis Center (US)
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
  • Northwest Lipid Metabolism and Diabetes Research Laboratories, Seattle, WA
  • University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
Davis, Asa K.
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2014-12-17
Volume
38
Issue
3
Pages
476-481
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W1982948566
Cited by
261
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 16
FWCI
11.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
Keywords
type 1 diabetes, C-peptide, residual insulin secretion, age at diagnosis, disease duration, beta cell destruction, insulin deficiency, diagnostic criteria
MeSH terms
Insulin Secretion, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, C-Peptide, Child, Child, Preschool, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, Humans, Insulin, Male, Middle Aged, Prevalence, Insulin-Secreting Cells, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review