Cited by 162Diabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and ManagementDiabetes Management and Research

Empagliflozin and Assessment of Lower-Limb Amputations in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME Trial

Inzucchi, Silvio E., Iliev, Hristo, Pfarr, Egon, Zinman, Bernard·2018·Diabetes Care

Abstract

Sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are oral glucose-lowering agents indicated for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. In the CANagliflozin cardioVascular Assessment Study (CANVAS) Program, the SGLT2 inhibitor canagliflozin was associated with an increased risk for lower-limb amputation (LLA) (including minor and major amputation) versus placebo (hazard ratio [HR] 1.97 [95% CI 1.41, 2.75]) in patients with type 2 diabetes and high cardiovascular risk (1). In the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial in patients with type 2 diabetes and established cardiovascular disease (2), the proportion of patients with LLA was similar between those treated with empagliflozin and placebo (3). We report further analyses of LLA in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial. Any hospital admission during the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial was to be reported as a serious adverse event. Investigators were asked to provide a detailed narrative with additional medical information for each serious adverse event. From the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial database, we identified LLA via a systematic search of serious adverse event narratives, from events reported as adverse events, and from those reported as a “medical procedure” under “concomitant therapy” in electronic case report forms or in investigator comments describing adverse events. All cases identified were medically reviewed to confirm an LLA event. Time to first LLA was analyzed using a …

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc17-1551

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The similar rates of amputation and fracture are consistent with trials of other SGLT2 inhibitors but differ from the CANVAS Program findings.

    “The similar rates of amputation and fracture that we observed with canagliflozin and placebo are reassuring and consistent with trials of other SGLT2 inhibitors 6,7,20 but differ from the CANVAS Program findings.5”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Inzucchi, S. E., Iliev, H., Pfarr, E., & Zinman, B.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • Boehringer Ingelheim (Germany) (DE)
  • Mount Sinai Hospital (CA)
Corresponding author
Inzucchi, Silvio E.
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2017-11-13
Volume
41
Issue
1
Pages
e4-e5
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2769721741
Cited by
162
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 2
FWCI
22.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
empagliflozin, lower limb amputation, SGLT2 inhibitors, type 2 diabetes, EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial, serious adverse events, cardiovascular disease, drug safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review