Cited by 11Diabetes Management and ResearchPancreatic function and diabetesDiabetes and associated disorders

The insulin-only bionic pancreas improves glycemic control in non-Hispanic White and minority adults and children with type 1 diabetes

Open access
Castellanos, Luz E., Russell, Steven J., Damiano, Edward R., Beck, Roy W., Shah, Viral N., Bailey, Ryan, Calhoun, Peter, Bird, Keisha +171 more·2023·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the performance of the iLet bionic pancreas (BP) in non-Hispanic White individuals (here referred to as “Whites”) and in Black, Hispanic, and other individuals (here collectively referred to as “Minorities”). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A multicenter, randomized controlled trial evaluated glycemic management with the BP versus standard of care (SC) in 161 adult and 165 pediatric participants with type 1 diabetes over 13 weeks. RESULTS: In Whites (n = 240), the mean baseline-adjusted difference in 13-week HbA1c between the BP and SC groups was −0.45% (95% CI −0.61 to −0.29 [−4.9 mmol/mol; −6.6 to −3.1]; P < 0.001), while this difference among Minorities (n = 84) was −0.53% (−0.83 to −0.24 [−6.0 mmol/mol; −9.2 to −2.8]; P < 0.001). In Whites, the mean baseline-adjusted difference in time in range between the BP and SC groups was 10% (95% CI 7–12; P < 0.001) and in Minorities was 14% (10–18; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The BP improves glycemic control in both Whites and Minorities and offers promise in decreasing health care disparities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc22-1478

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AID use in pivotal trials consistently improved A1C.

    “with consistent improvement in A1C, increase in TIR, especially overnight, as well as reduction of time spent in hypoglycemia (207-219).”

    From 7. Diabetes Technology: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [214]

  • Across pivotal trials, AID systems in people aged 2 years and older, including older adults, were superior to standard insulin delivery/manual mode or SAP/usual care.

    “all AID system pivotal trials that examined individuals 2 years old or older, including older adults, have consistently demonstrated superiority to either standard insulin delivery (or manual mode for the single-arm studies) or SAP and/or usual care (for the randomized trials)”

    From 7. Diabetes Technology: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [214]

  • AID use in pivotal trials consistently increased TIR, especially overnight.

    “with consistent improvement in A1C, increase in TIR, especially overnight, as well as reduction of time spent in hypoglycemia (207-219).”

    From 7. Diabetes Technology: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [214]

  • AID use in pivotal trials reduced time spent in hypoglycemia.

    “with consistent improvement in A1C, increase in TIR, especially overnight, as well as reduction of time spent in hypoglycemia (207-219).”

    From 7. Diabetes Technology: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [214]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. N Engl J Med 2017;376: 1419-1429

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Castellanos, L. E., Russell, S. J., Damiano, E. R., Beck, R. W., Shah, V. N., Bailey, R., Calhoun, P., Bird, K., Mauras, N., Bionic Pancreas Research Group, Wadwa, R. P., Forlenza, G., Slover, R., Messer, L., Cobry, E., Shah, V., Polsky, S., Jost, E., Berget, C., Towers, L., Lange, S., Escobar, E., Beatson, C., Walker, S., Karami, A., Boranian, E., Buckingham, B., Lal, R., Ekhlaspour, L., Hughes, M. S., Basina, M., Hsu, L., Hatipoglu, B., Zhou, K., Olansky, L., Surckla, A., Lomeli, L., Isaacs, D., Knapp, S., Debs, A., Tomaro, T., Blanchette, J., Russell, S., Sherwood, J., Castellanos, L., Hillard, M., Tuffaha, M., Putman, M., Sands, M., Balliro, C., Greaux, E., Steiner, B., Gaston, S., Bartholomew, R., Martin, K., Daniels, M., Bhangoo, A., Forghani, N., Kashmiri, H., Sutton, F., Speer, H., Erickson, M., Thompson, S., McDaniel, A., Raskin, P., Strowig, S., Jordan, L., White, P., Choudhary, A., Penn, J., Henson, M., Molina, Y., Nwosu, C., Kumar, V., Burris, A., Jernigan, K., Mann, B., Lynch, J., Jafri, R., Rayas, M., Escaname, E., Kerr, C., Favela-Prezas, R., Olivarri, S., Pettus, J., Boeder, S., May, T., Armstrong, A., Giovanetti, E., Hirsch, I., Trikudanathan, S., Sanborn, N., Averkiou, X., Goland, R., Williams, K., Leibel, N., Hyatt, J., Pollak, S., Robinson, E., Casciano, E., Alvarez, A., Zagoren, E., Johnson, J., Sharma, S., Buse, J., Kirkman, M. S., Bergamo, K., Klein, K., Dostou, J., Machineni, S., Young, L., Diner, J., Kass, A., Purrington, V., Fraser, R., Uehling, J., Kruger, D., Bhan, A., Jones, J. K., Cushman, T., Hunter, H., Corker, N., Mukhashen, S., Mauras, N., Benson, M., Bird, K., Englert, K., Permuy, J., Ponthieux, K., Tarko, A., Muir, A., Ham, J. N., Cossen, K., Felner, E., Antich, A., Sanchez, W., Anzai, M., Lucas, K., Simpson, C., McGill, J., Salam, M., Silverstein, J., Adamson, S., Cedeno, A., Clifton, M. J., Schweiger, T., Bell, T., Cogen, F., Meighan, S., Dauber, A., Castro, M., McCarthy, T., Boucher, K., Jenkins, H., Weissberg-Benchell, J., Ruedy, K., Beck, R., Borgman, S., Bradshaw, S., Miller, P., Li, Z., Calhoun, P., Marek, M., Pritchard, R., Dolzhenko, E., Damiano, E. R., El-Khatib, F. H., Gabrielson, D., Idzorek, J., Elstrom-Park, A., Arreaza-Rubin, G., Eggerman, T., Green, N., Belle, S. H., Castle, J., Green, J., Legault, L., Willi, S. M., & Wysham, C.
Affiliations
  • 1Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
  • 2Beta Bionics, Concord, MA
  • 4Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL
  • 5Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO
  • Jaeb Center for Health Research (US)
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2023-03-31
Volume
46
Issue
6
Pages
1185-1190
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W4362460280
Cited by
11
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4
FWCI
2.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (1UC4DK108612-01)
  • Beta Bionics, Inc
  • Novo Nordisk
  • Eli Lilly
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
Keywords
type 1 diabetes, bionic pancreas, glycemic control, HbA1c, time in range, racial and ethnic minorities, health care disparities, type 1 diabetes in children, adults with type 1 diabetes
MeSH terms
Glycemic Control, Adult, Artificial Organs, Bionics, Blood Glucose, Child, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Humans, Insulin, Minority Groups, Pancreas, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review