The DOI matches its Crossref record; 113 of the 116 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
13. Older Adults: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2022
Open accessAbstract
The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, a multidisciplinary expert committee (https://doi.org/10.2337/dc22-SPPC), are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations, please refer to the Standards of Care Introduction (https://doi.org/10.2337/dc22-SINT). Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Considering the older age of participants and comorbid conditions reported, the mean HbA1c, GMI, TIR, and TBR results (8.0%, 7.6%, 56%, and 1.0% at 6 months, respectively) demonstrate close adherence to established glycemic targets (23, 24, 38).”
From Observed Glycemic and Psychosocial Benefits in the Prospective Bigfoot Unity Real World Study: A 6-Month Analysis (2025) · cites this paper as [23]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Low and very low glucose events occurred at a low rate (mean of ∼1.3 and 0.2 events per person per week in the sixth month, respectively) and were in keeping with time below range meeting established standards (23, 24, 38).”
From Observed Glycemic and Psychosocial Benefits in the Prospective Bigfoot Unity Real World Study: A 6-Month Analysis (2025) · cites this paper as [23]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Other parameters such as the mean percent time of sensor use and mean coefficient of variation (84% and 31% at 6 months, respectively) are also within established guidelines (23, 24, 38).”
From Observed Glycemic and Psychosocial Benefits in the Prospective Bigfoot Unity Real World Study: A 6-Month Analysis (2025) · cites this paper as [23]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“The observed reduction in HbA1c did not compromise the population from meeting established hypoglycemia targets of < 4% and < 1% for percent time < 70 mg/dL (mean 1.0%) and < 54 mg/dL (mean 0.04%), respectively (22-24).”
From Observed Glycemic and Psychosocial Benefits in the Prospective Bigfoot Unity Real World Study: A 6-Month Analysis (2025) · cites this paper as [23]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 · Cited by 88,282
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment
Nasreddine, Z. S., Phillips, N. A., Bédirian, V., Charbonneau, S., Whitehead, V., Collin, I., Cummings, J. L., & Chertkow, H. (2005) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x · Cited by 25,553
Empagliflozin, Cardiovascular Outcomes, and Mortality in Type 2 Diabetes
Zinman, B., Wanner, C., Lachin, J. M., Fitchett, D., Bluhmki, E., Hantel, S., Mattheus, M., Devins, T., Johansen, O. E., Woerle, H. J., et al. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1504720 · Cited by 12,315
Effects of Intensive Glucose Lowering in Type 2 Diabetes
(2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0802743 · Cited by 7,888
Canagliflozin and Cardiovascular and Renal Events in Type 2 Diabetes
Neal, B., Perkovic, V., Mahaffey, K. W., de Zeeuw, D., Fulcher, G., Erondu, N., Shaw, W., Law, G., Desai, M., & Matthews, D. R. (2017) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1611925 · Cited by 7,830
The American Psychological Association
Langfeld, H. S. (1919) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.49.1254.51 · Cited by 7,453
Dapagliflozin and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes
Wiviott, S. D., Raz, I., Bonaca, M. P., Mosenzon, O., Kato, E. T., Cahn, A., Silverman, M. G., Zelniker, T. A., Kuder, J. F., Murphy, S. A., et al. (2019) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1812389 · Cited by 6,382
Glucose control and vascular complications in veterans with type 2 diabetes
Duckworth, W., Abraira, C., Moritz, T., Reda, D., Emanuele, N., Reaven, P. D., Zieve, F. J., Marks, J., Davis, S. N., Hayward, R., et al. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0808431 · Cited by 4,762
Davies, M. J., D’Alessio, D. A., Fradkin, J., Kernan, W. N., Mathieu, C., Mingrone, G., Rossing, P., Tsapas, A., Wexler, D. J., & Buse, J. B. (2018) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dci18-0033 · Cited by 3,518
Treatment of hypertension in patients 80 years of age or older
Beckett, N. S., Peters, R., Fletcher, A. E., Staessen, J. A., Liu, L., Dumitrascu, D., Stoyanovsky, V., Antikainen, R. L., Nikitin, Y., Anderson, C., et al. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0801369 · Cited by 3,092
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Laiteerapong, 2018, Diabetes in older adults
- Laiteerapong, 2012, Classification of older adults who have diabetes by comorbid conditions, United States, 2005-2006, Prev Chronic Dis, 9, E100
- Ghezzi, 2013, Disease-modifying drugs in Alzheimer’s disease, Drug Des Devel Ther, 7, 1471
- Tomlin, 2016, The influence of cognition on self-management of type 2 diabetes in older people, Psychol Res Behav Manag, 9, 7
- Sinclair, 2013, IDF Global Guideline For Managing Older People With Type 2 Diabetes
- Zhang, 2018, Change in insurance status and cost-related medication non-adherence among older U.S. adults with diabetes from 2010 to 2014, J Health Med Econ, 4, 7
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Virani, S. S., Newby, L. K., Arnold, S. V., Bittner, V., Brewer, L. C., Demeter, S. H., Dixon, D. L., Fearon, W. F., Hess, B., Johnson, H. M., et al. (2023) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000001168 · Cited by 1,598
Virani, S. S., Newby, L. K., Arnold, S. V., Bittner, V., Brewer, L. C., Demeter, S. H., Dixon, D. L., Fearon, W. F., Hess, B., Johnson, H. M., et al. (2023) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2023.04.003 · Cited by 596
Type 2 diabetes and cognitive dysfunction–towards effective management of both comorbidities
Srikanth, V., Sinclair, A. J., Hill-Briggs, F., Moran, C., & Biessels, G. J. (2020) · The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(20)30118-2 · Cited by 465
Mone, P., Varzideh, F., Jankauskas, S. S., Pansini, A., Lombardi, A., Frullone, S., & Santulli, G. (2022) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/hypertensionaha.122.19586 · Cited by 231
Hanlon, P., Fauré, I., Corcoran, N., Butterly, E. W., Lewsey, J., McAllister, D., & Mair, F. S. (2020) · The Lancet Healthy Longevity · doi:10.1016/s2666-7568(20)30014-3 · Cited by 203
Metadata
- Authors
- American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee
- Corresponding author
- American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 2021-12-16
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- Supplement_1
- Pages
- S195-S207
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8935395
- OpenAlex
- W4200063208
- Cited by
- 381
- References
- 116
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 68 · 2023: 115 · 2022: 86 · 2021: 26
- FWCI
- 11.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (K24AG069080, R01AG060756, R01AG063391)
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK092949)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Keywords
- diabetes in older adults, clinical guidelines, treatment goals, quality of care, level of evidence
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Diabetes Mellitus, Endocrinology, Humans, Reference Standards, Societies, Medical, Standard of Care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
