Cited by 10Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies

Genetic evidence strongly supports managing weight and blood pressure in addition to glycemic control in preventing vascular complications in people with type 2 diabetes

Open access
Ahmed, Altayeb, Amin, Hasnat, Drenos, Fotios, Sattar, Naveed, Yaghootkar, Hanieh·2023·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the causal association of type 2 diabetes and its components with risk of vascular complications independent of shared risk factors obesity and hypertension and to identify the main driver of this risk. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted Mendelian randomization (MR) using independent genetic variants previously associated with type 2 diabetes, fasting glucose, HbA1c, fasting insulin, BMI, and systolic blood pressure as instrumental variables. We obtained summary-level data for 18 vascular diseases (15 for type 2 diabetes) from FinnGen and publicly available genome-wide association studies as our outcomes. We conducted univariable and multivariable MR, in addition to sensitivity tests to detect and minimize pleiotropic effects. RESULTS: Univariable MR analysis showed that type 2 diabetes was associated with 9 of 15 outcomes; BMI and systolic blood pressure were associated with 13 and 15 of 18 vascular outcomes, respectively; and fasting insulin was associated with 4 and fasting glucose with 2. No robust association was found for HbA1c instruments. With adjustment for correlated traits in the multivariable test, BMI and systolic blood pressure, consistent causal effects were maintained, while five associations with type 2 diabetes (chronic kidney disease, ischemic heart disease, heart failure, subarachnoid hemorrhage, and intracerebral hemorrhage) were attenuated to null. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings add strong evidence to support the importance of BMI and systolic blood pressure in the development of vascular complications in people with type 2 diabetes. Such findings strongly support the need for better weight and blood pressure management in type 2 diabetes, independent of glucose lowering, to limit important complications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc23-0855

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Additional evidence confirms that obesity is a contributing factor for type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and thrombotic episodes, as well as conditions linked to inflammation such as heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

    “Additional evi dence confirms that obesity is a contributing factor for type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and thrombotic ep isodes, as well as conditions linked to inflammation such as heart failure with preserved ejection frac tion. 2-7”

    From Comprehensive Long-Term Changes in Cardiovascular Risk Biomarkers With Tirzepatide (2026) · cites this paper as [3]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) identifies excess adiposity as an upstream factor in type 2 diabetes, and the vascular-complications results link higher BMI to several outcomes. The paper also discusses heart failure and pulmonary embolism, but the passages do not establish obesity as a cause of hypertension or thrombotic episodes generally, and they do not address inflammation or heart failure with preserved ejection fraction specifically. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ahmed, A., Amin, H., Drenos, F., Sattar, N., & Yaghootkar, H.
Affiliations
  • Brunel University of London (GB)
  • University of Glasgow (GB)
  • University of Lincoln (GB)
Corresponding author
Yaghootkar, Hanieh
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2023-08-09
Volume
46
Issue
10
Pages
1783-1791
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W4385690655
Cited by
10
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 8
FWCI
1.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lincoln Repository (University of Lincoln) (acceptedVersion)
  • Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • British Heart Foundation (RE/18/6/34217)
  • Diabetes UK (17/0005594)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, vascular complications, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, weight management, blood pressure control, glycemic control, fasting insulin, fasting blood glucose, HbA1c, chronic kidney disease, ischemic heart disease, heart failure, subarachnoid hemorrhage, intracerebral hemorrhage, causal relationship, pleiotropy
MeSH terms
Glycemic Control, Blood Glucose, Blood Pressure, Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Insulin, Risk Factors, Body Mass Index, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Genome-Wide Association Study, Mendelian Randomization Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review