Cited by 61Liver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsChronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes

Metabolic syndrome traits increase the risk of major adverse liver outcomes in type 2 diabetes

Open access
Shang, Ying, Grip, Emilie Toresson, Modica, Angelo, Skröder, Helena, Ström, Oskar, Ntanios, Fady, Gudbjörnsdottir, Soffia, Hagström, Hannes·2024·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) increases the risk for major adverse liver outcomes (MALOs), including cirrhosis and its complications. Patients with T2D frequently have other traits of the metabolic syndrome (MetS). It remains uncertain whether there is a synergistic effect of accumulating MetS traits on future MALO risk. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients with T2D without a history of liver disease were identified from national registers in Sweden from 1998 to 2021. MetS traits included hypertension, low HDL level, hypertriglyceridemia, obesity, and albuminuria, in addition to T2D. MALO events were identified based on administrative coding from national registers until 31 October 2022. Data were analyzed using Cox regression models. RESULTS: In total, 230,992 patients were identified (median age 64 years; 58% male), of whom 3,215 (1.39%) developed MALOs over a median follow-up of 9.9 years. Compared with patients with one MetS trait (only T2D) at baseline, those with more than one MetS trait had a higher rate of MALOs (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.33, 95% CI 1.53-3.54). The rate of MALOs increased progressively with increasing numbers of MetS traits at baseline (aHR 1.28 per added trait, 95% CI 1.23-1.33). During follow-up, patients who acquired additional MetS traits had a progressively higher rate of MALOs. The MetS trait with the largest association with incident MALOs was hypertension (aHR 2.06, 95% CI 1.57-2.71). CONCLUSIONS: Having or acquiring additional traits of MetS increase the rate of progression to MALOs in patients with T2D. These results could be used to inform screening initiatives for liver disease.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc23-1937

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Having several cardiometabolic risk factors confers a greater risk of progressive liver damage and major adverse liver outcomes.

    “Conversely, having several cardiometabolic risk factors confers a greater risk of progressive liver damage and major adverse liver outcomes. 17,35”

    From EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). (2024) · cites this paper as [17]

    The Conclusions report that, among patients with type 2 diabetes, each additional metabolic syndrome trait was associated with a stepwise increase in major adverse liver outcomes. The claim omits that population restriction and refers to progressive liver damage more broadly than the outcomes reported; “confers” also implies a stronger causal conclusion than the study’s association. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In a Swedish cohort study, the cumulative incidence of major adverse liver outcomes over ten years in individuals with T2D increased with the number of components of the metabolic syndrome, but was still <2% in those presenting with all 5 components.

    “Still, in a Swedish cohort study, the cumulative incidence of major adverse liver outcomes over ten years in individuals with T2D increased with the number of components of the metabolic syndrome, but was still &lt; 2% in those presenting with all 5 components. 17”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shang, Y., Grip, E. T., Modica, A., Skröder, H., Ström, O., Ntanios, F., Gudbjörnsdottir, S., & Hagström, H.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • 3Pfizer AB, Stockholm, Sweden
  • Quantify Research (Sweden) (SE)
  • Pfizer (United States) (US)
  • 5Swedish National Diabetes Register
  • Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
Corresponding author
Shang, Ying
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2024-03-18
Volume
47
Issue
6
Pages
978-985
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W4392907512
Cited by
61
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 15
FWCI
18.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • The Swedish Research Council
  • Mag-TarmFonden, Swedish Gastroenterology Society
  • Pfizer
  • Karolinska Institutet
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, metabolic syndrome, major adverse liver outcomes, liver cirrhosis, hypertension, hypertriglyceridemia, low HDL cholesterol, obesity, albuminuria, liver disease screening, disease progression
MeSH terms
Aged, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Liver Diseases, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Sweden, Metabolic Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review