Cited by 320Liver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentAlcohol Consumption and Health EffectsLiver Diseases and Immunity

Effect of metabolic traits on the risk of cirrhosis and hepatocellular cancer in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

Kanwal, Fasiha, Kramer, Jennifer R., Li, Liang, Dai, Jianliang, Natarajan, Yamini, Yu, Xian, Asch, Steven M., El‐Serag, Hashem B.·2020·Hepatology

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is now the most common liver condition. Predicting its progression could help clinicians manage and potentially prevent complications. We evaluated the independent and joint effects of metabolic traits on the risk of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) among patients with NAFLD. APPROACH AND RESULTS: We assembled a retrospective cohort of patients with NAFLD diagnosed at 130 facilities in the Veterans Administration between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2008, with follow-up through December 31, 2015. We performed competing risk-adjusted cause-specific Cox models to evaluate the effects of metabolic traits (diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, obesity) as additive or combined indicators on time to develop cirrhosis or HCC or a composite endpoint of both. Of the 271,906 patients, 22,794 developed cirrhosis, and 253 developed HCC during a mean of 9 years follow-up. At baseline, the mean body mass index was 31.6 (SD, 5.6), 28.7% had diabetes, 70.3% had hypertension, and 62.3% had dyslipidemia with substantial overlap among these traits. The risk of progression was the lowest in patients with only one or no metabolic trait. There was a stepwise increase in risk with each additional metabolic trait. Compared with patients with no metabolic trait, patients with both hypertension and dyslipidemia had 1.8-fold higher risk of progression to cirrhosis/HCC (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.59-2.06); the risk was 2.6-fold higher in patients with diabetes, obesity, dyslipidemia, and hypertension (HR = 2.6, 95% CI = 2.3-2.9). These associations were stronger for HCC. Diabetes had the strongest association with HCC in this cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Each additional metabolic trait increased the risk of cirrhosis and HCC in patients with NAFLD. Diabetes conferred the highest risk of progression to HCC. Patients with diabetes and coexisting hypertension and obesity may be important targets for secondary prevention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hep.31014

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kanwal, F., Kramer, J. R., Li, L., Dai, J., Natarajan, Y., Yu, X., Asch, S. M., & El‐Serag, H. B.
Affiliations
  • Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center (US)
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • VA Palo Alto Health Care System (US)
Corresponding author
Kanwal, Fasiha
Venue
Hepatology
Published
2020-02-26
Volume
71
Issue
3
Pages
808-819
ISSN
  • 0270-9139 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-3350
OpenAlex
W2988945504
Cited by
319
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 1
FWCI
23.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Hepatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Diseases and Immunity
Keywords
non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, liver cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, metabolic phenotypes, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, dyslipidemia, obesity, disease progression, veterans, secondary prevention
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Female, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, Humans, Hypertension, Liver Cirrhosis, Liver Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Retrospective Studies, Risk, Diabetes Complications, Dyslipidemias, Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review