Cited by 43Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and Education

Closed-loop insulin therapy for people with type 2 diabetes treated with an insulin pump: a 12-week multicenter, open-label randomized, controlled, crossover trial

Open access
Borel, Anne-Laure, Lablanche, Sandrine, Waterlot, Christine, Joffray, Eloïse, Barra, Céline, Arnol, Nathalie, Amougay, Hafid, Benhamou, Pierre-Yves·2024·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) combined with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) achieves better glycemic control than multi-injection therapy in people with type 2 diabetes. The effectiveness of closed-loop therapy needs to be further evaluated in this population. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The study objective was to measure the impact of a hybrid closed-loop device (DBLG1) compared with CSII + CGM on glycemic control in people with type 2 diabetes previously treated with CSII. The randomized, controlled, crossover, two-period, open-label, and multicenter study was conducted from August 2022 to July 2023 in 17 individuals (9 to receive 6 weeks of CSII + CGM first and 8 to receive 6 weeks of closed-loop therapy first). The primary end point was the percentage time in range (TIR: 70–180 mg/dL). Secondary outcomes were other CGM-glucose metrics, physical activity, and sleep objectively measured using 1-week actimetry. RESULTS: Data were analyzed using a modified intention-to-treat approach. Mean age was 63 (SD 9) years and 35% were women. Mean HbA1c at inclusion was 7.9% (SD 0.9). TIR increased to 76.0% (interquartile range 69.0–84.0) during the closed-loop condition vs. 61.0% (interquartile range 55.0–70.0) during the CSII + CGM condition; mean difference was 15.0 percentage points (interquartile range 8.0–22.0; P < 0.001). Analyses of secondary end points showed a decrease in time above range, in glucose management indicator, in glucose variability, and an increase in daily insulin dose. Actimetric sleep analysis showed an improvement in sleep fragmentation during closed-loop treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Closed-loop therapy improved glycemic control more than did CSII + CGM in people with type 2 diabetes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc24-0623

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In that crossover trial, total daily insulin dose increased while on AID.

    “Of note, an increase in total daily insulin dose was noted in the subjects while on the AID system (249), whereas other studies have shown either nonsignificant trends for a lower total daily dose of insulin in the AID group (250) or a reduction of total daily insulin in the AID group previously using MDI (251).”

    From 7. Diabetes Technology: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [249]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [3]Fosse-Edorh SPC, Saboni L, Mandereau-Bruno L,. Études Entred: un dispositif pour améliorer la connaissance de l’état de santé des personnes présentant un diabète en France – Premiers résultats de la troisième édition conduite en métropole en 2019. Bull Epidémiol Hebd 2022; 22: 383– 392

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Borel, A.-L., Lablanche, S., Waterlot, C., Joffray, E., Barra, C., Arnol, N., Amougay, H., & Benhamou, P.-Y.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier Métropole Savoie (FR)
  • IC@dom SASU (France) (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier Annecy Genevois (FR)
Corresponding author
Borel, Anne-Laure
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2024-08-06
Volume
47
Issue
10
Pages
1778-1786
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W4401362608
Cited by
43
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 2
FWCI
14.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
Keywords
artificial pancreas, type 2 diabetes, continuous glucose monitoring, insulin pump therapy, glycemic control, time in range, insulin pump, sleep fragmentation, glycemic variability, glucose management indicator
MeSH terms
Aged, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Insulin Infusion Systems, Male, Middle Aged, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Cross-Over Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review