Cited by 169Pancreatic function and diabetesDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Importance of Glucose Per Se to Intravenous Glucose Tolerance: Comparison of the Minimal-Model Prediction with Direct Measurements

Ader, Marilyn, Pacini, Giovanni, Yang, Yeon J, Bergman, Richard N·1985·Diabetes

Abstract

Glucose disappearance after an oral or intravenous challenge is a function of the effects of both endogenously secreted insulin and of glucose itself. We previously introduced the term "glucose effectiveness," or SG, defined as the ability of glucose per se to enhance its own disappearance independent of an increment in plasma insulin. The present investigation, performed in conscious dogs, was undertaken to quantify this glucose effect by minimal-model-based analysis of insulin and glucose dynamics after a frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test (FSIGT). The values from the standard FSIGT were then compared with direct measurements obtained from experiments in which the dynamic insulin response to glucose was suppressed with somatostatin (SRIF). In addition, we examined SG values from the modified FSIGT protocol, which involves both glucose and tolbutamide injections. Protocol l (N = 9): FSIGTs were performed and the glucose and insulin data were analyzed by computer. KG was 2.65 +/- 0.28 min-1, S1 was 4.09 +/- 0.34 X 10(4) min-1/(microU/ml), and SG was 0.033 +/- 0.004 min-1. Protocol II (N = 6): FSIGTs were performed on animals in which SRIF was infused (0.8 micrograms/min X kg) to obliterate the dynamic insulin response to glucose injection. Before the FSIGt, insulin and glucagon were infused intraportally to reattain basal glycemia. Without dynamic insulin, KG was reduced to 0.96 +/- 0.18 min-1 (P less than 0.0001). However, SG, estimated from the exponentia…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diab.34.11.1092

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The euglycaemic range of nondiabetic subjects does not reflect the relatively hyperglycaemic state that characterizes T1DM patients and can impact glucose tolerance.

    “Therefore, applying their results to T1DM women requires much caution, as the euglycaemic range of nondiabetic subjects does not reflect the real relatively hyperglycaemic state that characterizes T1DM patients and can impact glucose tolerance [33].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ader, M., Pacini, G., Yang, Y. J., & Bergman, R. N.
Affiliations
University of Southern California (US)
Venue
Diabetes
Published
1985-11-01
Volume
34
Issue
11
Pages
1092-1103
ISSN
  • 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-327X
OpenAlex
W2100795674
Cited by
169
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
5.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (5t32gm008017-05, 2r01am029867-04, 5r01am027619-05)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32-GM-08017)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
glucose effectiveness, glucose disappearance, intravenous glucose tolerance test, somatostatin, insulin suppression, glucose kinetics, minimal model analysis, tolbutamide, dogs, glucose metabolism, glucagon
MeSH terms
Animals, Blood Glucose, Dogs, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Glucagon, Glucose, Glucose Tolerance Test, Insulin, Male, Mathematics, Models, Biological, Somatostatin, Tolbutamide

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review