Cited by 171Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementPancreatic function and diabetesDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Defects in Insulin Secretion and Action in Women With a History of Gestational Diabetes

Ryan, Edmond A, Imes, Sharleen Imes, Liu, Dating, McManus, Ruth, Finegood, Diane T, Polonsky, Kenneth S, Sturis, Jeppe·1995·Diabetes

Abstract

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is associated with defects in insulin secretion and insulin action, and women with a history of GDM carry a high risk for the development of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). Assessment of subjects with a history of GDM who are currently normoglycemic should help elucidate some of the underlying defects in insulin secretion or action in the evolution of NIDDM. We have studied 14 women with normal oral glucose tolerance who had a history of GDM. They were compared with a group of control subjects who were matched for both body mass index (BMI) and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR). All subjects underwent tests for the determination of oral glucose tolerance, ultradian oscillations in insulin secretion during a 28-h glucose infusion, insulin secretion in response to intravenous glucose, glucose disappearance after intravenous glucose (Kg), and insulin sensitivity (SI) as measured by the Bergman minimal model method. The BMI in the post-GDM women was similar to that in the control subjects (24.9 ± 1.2 vs. 25.4 ± 1.4 kg/m2, respectively), as was the WHR ratio (0.80 ± 0.01 vs. 0.76 ± 0.01, respectively). The post-GDM women were slightly older (35.2 ± 0.9 vs. 32.1 ± 1.4 years, P = 0.04). The fasting plasma glucose levels were significantly higher in the post-GDM group than in the control group (4.9 ± 0.1 vs. 4.4 ± 0.1 mmol/l, respectively, P < 0.001) and remained higher at each of the subsequent determinations during the oral glucose tolerance test, although none had a result indicative of either diabetes or impaired glucose tolerance. All measures of ultradian insulin secretory oscillations in post-GDM subjects were indistinguishable from those in the control subjects. The first-phase insulin release to intravenous glucose was lower in the post-GDM group. SI was also impaired in the post-GDM group compared with the control subjects (4.6 ± 0.5 vs. 6.8 ± 1.0·10−4·min−1· ³U−1·ml, respectively, P < 0.05). Kg was reduced in the post-GDM women compared with the control subjects (1.3 ± 0.1 vs. 2.7 ± 0.4%, P < 0.01). When the subjects were divided according to their BMI, lean post-GDM subjects (<24.2, n = 8) were more insulin resistant than the lean control subjects: SI 5.3 ± 0.6 vs. 8.8 ± 1 · 1·10−4 min −1· ³U−1·ml, P = 0.02, whereas obese post-GDM (>24.2 kg/m2, n = 6) and control subjects had a lower SI than the lean subjects, but they were not different from each other (3.6 ± 0.7 vs. 4.2 ± 1.2· 10−4· min−1 · ³U−1 · ml, respectively, P = 0.67). The acute insulin responses to glucose (0–10 min) within these groups showed that the lean post-GDM group had a significantly lower insulin response compared with control subjects (1,205 ± 179 vs. 2,404 ± 416 pmol· 1−1 min, respectively, P = 0.007), whereas the obese groups had similar responses (2,777 ± 1,112 vs. 3,114 ± 847 pmol ·1−·min, post-GDM vs. control subjects, P = 0.8). We have found defects in insulin secretion and action in post-GDM subjects who are at high risk for the development of NIDDM at a time that oral glucose tolerance is normal. These defects are present in the absence of obesity. Ultradian insulin secretory oscillations during constant glucose infusion are normal in these post-GDM subjects predisposed to NIDDM. We conclude that defects in both insulin secretion and insulin action are present before the development of hyperglycemia in women with a history of GDM.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diab.44.5.506

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Subjects at high risk of developing Type 2 diabetes, including first-degree relatives, women with a history of gestational diabetes or polycystic ovarian disease, older subjects, and subjects with impaired glucose tolerance, have diminished beta-cell function, manifest as a reduced first-phase insulin response to intravenous glucose relative to insulin sensitivity, even when many still have NGT.

    “Based on the concept of a feedback loop, it has become evident that subjects who are at high risk of developing Type 2 diabetes have diminished beta-cell function at a time when many of them still have NGT.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ryan, E. A., Imes, S. I., Liu, D., McManus, R., Finegood, D. T., Polonsky, K. S., & Sturis, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • University of Chicago (US)
Venue
Diabetes
Published
1995-05-01
Volume
44
Issue
5
Pages
506-512
ISSN
  • 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-327X
OpenAlex
W2113330645
Cited by
171
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 9
FWCI
8.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Canadian Diabetes Association
  • University of Alberta
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
gestational diabetes mellitus, insulin secretion, insulin action, insulin sensitivity, type 2 diabetes risk, first-phase insulin release, glucose disappearance rate, oral glucose tolerance, prediabetes, beta-cell function, insulin resistance, body mass index, waist-to-hip ratio, fasting blood glucose
MeSH terms
Insulin Secretion, Activity Cycles, Adult, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Insulin, Insulin Resistance, Obesity, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, Body Mass Index, Diabetes, Gestational

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review