Cited by 53Pancreatic function and diabetesDiabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes and associated disorders

Insulin and Amylin Release Are Both Diminished in First-Degree Relatives of Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes

Open access
Knowles, Negar G., Landchild, Melinda A., Fujimoto, Wilfred Y., Kahn, Steven E.·2002·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE—To determine whether first-degree relatives of individuals with type 2 diabetes, who are at high risk of subsequently developing hyperglycemia, manifest alterations in β-cell function including an alteration in the co-release of insulin and amylin. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—In 30 first-degree relatives and 24 matched subjects with no family history of diabetes, β-cell function was measured as the intravenous glucose-induced acute insulin response (AIRg) and acute amylin response (AARg). The insulin sensitivity index (SI) was quantified and used to account for the role of insulin sensitivity to modulate β-cell function (SI × β-cell function). RESULTS—Fasting plasma glucose (5.3 ± 0.1 vs. 5.1 ± 0.1 mmol/l; means ± SEM), immunoreactive insulin (IRI) (68 ± 7 vs. 57 ± 6 pmol/l) and amylin-like immunoreactivity (ALI) (5.5 ± 0.6 vs. 4.7 ± 0.7 pmol/l) were similar in relatives and control subjects, respectively. Relatives were insulin resistant compared with control subjects (SI: 4.86 ± 0.63 vs. 7.20 ± 0.78 × 10−5 min−1 · pmol−1 · l−1, P = 0.01), but their AIRg (392 ± 59 vs. 386 ± 50 pmol/l) and AARg (5.9 ± 0.9 vs. 6.1 ± 0.8 pmol/l) did not differ. When β-cell function was determined relative to insulin sensitivity, in the first-degree relatives, both AIRg (SI × AIRg: 1.60 ± 0.23 vs. 2.44 ± 0.31 × 10−2 min−1, P < 0.05) and AARg (SI × AARg: 2.39 ± 0.35 vs. 4.06 ± 0.56 × 10−4 min−1, P < 0.05) were reduced. The molar proportion of ALI to IRI was not altered in high-risk subjects (1.75 ± 0.16 vs. 1.71 ± 0.15%). CONCLUSIONS—First-degree relatives of subjects with type 2 diabetes have diminished β-cell function at a time when they are not hyperglycemic, and this reduction affects insulin and amylin responses proportionally. Thus, an altered amylin-to-insulin ratio is not likely to identify individuals at high risk of developing type 2 diabetes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diacare.25.2.292

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The majority of subjects who have two first-degree relatives with Type 2 diabetes have percentile scores below the 50th percentile for the relationship between insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion.

    “Using this approach, the majority of subjects who have two first-degree relatives with Type 2 diabetes have percentile scores that place them below the mean (50 th percentile) for the relationship between insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion, which is in keeping with their high risk status [106] (Fig. 4).”
  • The same parallelism between insulin and IAPP is present in humans in response to glucose and arginine over a broad range of glucose concentrations, with IAPP release being reduced in Type 2 diabetes.

    “This same parallelism is present in humans in response to both glucose [106, 118] and arginine over a broad range of glucose concentrations [119] with IAPP release being reduced in Type 2 diabetes [84, 85, 86, 87].”
  • In older subjects and first-degree relatives of subjects with Type 2 diabetes, the IAPP response to glucose injection is reduced.

    “We have confirmed this hypothesis in assessments of older subjects and first-degree relatives of subjects with Type 2 diabetes in whom a reduced IAPP response to glucose injection has been shown [106, 118].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Knowles, N. G., Landchild, M. A., Fujimoto, W. Y., & Kahn, S. E.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2002-02-01
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
292-297
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2150981747
Cited by
51
References
49
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • American Diabetes Association
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
  • American Federation for Aging Research
  • Amylin Pharmaceuticals
  • Office of Research and Development
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK050703, K24DK002654, DK50703, DK 02654, DK-17047, P30DK017047)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, first-degree relatives, amylin, insulin, beta-cell function, insulin sensitivity, acute insulin response, insulin resistance, glucose tolerance, family history of diabetes, pancreatic islets, islet transplantation
MeSH terms
Adult, Amyloid, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Family, Fasting, Female, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Insulin, Islets of Langerhans, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Biomarkers, Linear Models, Islet Amyloid Polypeptide

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review