Long-term results of early cyclosporin therapy in juvenile IDDM
Abstract
In juvenile IDDM patients, immunosuppression with cyclosporin A allows partial beta-cell function recovery and transient remissions of insulin dependency. The effects of this therapeutic approach, however, have not been evaluated in the long-term, since no reported trial exceeded 1 year. Here we analyze 130 diabetic children followed at our institution during the first years of their disease. Cyclosporin was given to 83 of them at an initial dose of 7.2 ± 0.1 mg·kg−1·day−1, which was decreased stepwise then interrupted after 6–62 months, depending on the response to therapy. A total of 47 diabetic children, who served as control subjects in two trials, were pooled for comparison. Over 4 years, the cyclosporin-treated group kept plasma C-peptide ∼ twice as high as the control group (P < 0.02). It took 5.8 ± 0.6 years for C-peptide secretion stimulated by glucagon to become undetectable in the cyclosporin group versus 3.2 ± 0.6 years in the control group (P < 0.02). Average insulin dose remained lower by 0.2–0.4 U·kg−1·day−1 and glycated hemoglobin by ∼ 1% in cyclosporin-treated patients (P < 0.02), who also had less hypoglycemia than the diabetic control subjects (P < 0.05). After 4 years, differences between the groups became nonsignificant. We observed no significant secondary effects of cyclosporin. In conclusion, positive effects of low-dose cyclosporin in recently diagnosed clinical IDDM patients are prolonged beyond interruption of the drug. The magnitude and duration of the benefit, however, do not appear sufficient to justify this immunosuppressive treatment in clinical practice.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Ciclosporin did not produce lasting remission, although insulin needs fell while patients were on it.
“Although ciclosporin was unable to induce a durable disease remission, insulin requirements of patients decreased during active treatment, generating enthusiasm that immune modulation could treat type 1 diabetes.134–136”
From Type 1 diabetes (2018) · cites this paper as [135]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
DiMeglio, L. A., Evans-Molina, C., & Oram, R. A. (2018) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31320-5 · Cited by 1,561 · see citing works
- Authors
- Filippo, G. D., Carel, J.-C., Boitard, C., & Bougnères, P.-F.
- Affiliations
- Inserm (FR)
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Necker Hospital Paris, France
- Pediatric Endocrinology and U342 Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicate (INSERM), Saint Vincent de Paul Hospital, René Descartes University Paris, France
- Venue
- Diabetes
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 1996-01-01
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 101-104
- ISSN
- 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-327X
- OpenAlex
- W2011541175
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Diabetes (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Keywords
- cyclosporine, type 1 diabetes, immunosuppression, C-peptide, insulin dose reduction, HbA1c, hypoglycemia, long-term outcomes, children
- MeSH terms
- Autoantibodies, C-Peptide, Child, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Double-Blind Method, Drug Therapy, Combination, Follow-Up Studies, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Immunosuppressive Agents, Insulin, Islets of Langerhans, Longitudinal Studies, Prognosis, Cyclosporine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review